SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M. NAGAPRASANNA
Ravi Kumar C. – Appellant
Versus
Central Adoption Resource Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Sri Sameer Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents: Sri H. Shanthi Bhushan, DSGI

ORDER

The petitioners/husband and wife are before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners through electronic mail and redress the grievance. The grievance is concerning cross-border adoption of a child.

2. Sans details, facts in brief germane are as follows:-

The petitioners are husband and wife; citizens of India. Presently they are in Nairobi, Kenya. The husband is working as Vice-President, Africa in Intellect Design Arena Limited, Nairobi. The wife is a software Engineer working in Kenya. The petitioners between 2011 and 2018 were residents of Uganda and later shifted to Kenya from 2019 and even today they hold Indian passport as they have not renounced Indian citizenship. During the time they were staying in Uganda, the petitioners became desirous of adopting a child and in such pursuit of adoption, after following all due procedures took steps with the prevailing law in Uganda to get a child which matched them. The child who was taken in adoption on 12-08-2014 is Master Kris Bright Kumar. The petitioners then filed an application before the jurisdiction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top