Yashika Shah VS Registrar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Yashika Shah – Appellant
Versus
Registrar – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Shri Abhinav Dhanodkar, Advocate

ORDER

Heard.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:-

“In view of the facts & grounds mentioned- above in Para 5 Para 6 respectively, the petitioners’ pray that this petition be allowed in the nature of mandamus or any direction may kindly be issued and following relief may be granted to the petitioner as under :

i) That, this Hon’ble Court is requested to quash the order/office note dated 13.11.2024 passed by respondent. -

ii) That, the other relief which is just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be, granted doing justice including cost.”

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that both of them have tried to file an application under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, however the same has been refused to be accepted by the Naib Nazir of the Family Court, endorsing that they have not yet completed one year of marriage. Thus, counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the application filed by the petitioners was not even allowed to be placed before the concerned Judge of the Family Court for its proper disposal in accordance with law, which has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document