ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Bank of Baroda – Appellant
Versus
U. N. Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Matter comes up on an application submitted by the respondents under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for vacation of exparte stay order dated 02.06.2023.
2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the arguments have been heard finally and this writ petition is decided by this order.
3. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 23.05.2023 by which the misc. application No. 81/2018 submitted by the respondents has been allowed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (for short, ‘the DRT’) and the earlier orders dated 28.01.2016 and 30.03.2016 have been modified by granting the respondents a period of twelve months to complete the repayment of the remaining amount as per the OTS/settlement.
4. Counsel for the petitioner-Bank submits that when the default was committed by the respondents, proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the SARFAESI Act, 2002’) were initiated against the respondents borrowers. In the meantime, a One Time Settlement (OTS) was arrived at between the parties and in terms of the aforesaid OTS/settlement, the S
Punjab National Bank vs. O.C. Krishnan and Ors.
K. Sreedhar vs. Raus Constructions Pvt. Ltd., and Ors.
Ajanta LLP vs. Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
PHR Invent Educational Society vs. UCO Bank and Ors
State Bank of India vs. S.N. Goyal
Bijnor Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. Meenal Agarwal and Ors.
Alternative remedy is not an absolute bar on maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, where DRT has exceeded in exercising its jurisdiction.
The court established that compliance with statutory provisions is essential in possession proceedings under the Securitisation Act, and alternative remedies must be exhausted before seeking judicial....
Powers of High Court under Article 226 cannot be invoked in matter of recovery of dues under Act, unless there is any statutory violation resulting in prejudice to party or where such proceedings or ....
The District Magistrate can correct typographical errors in orders under the SARFAESI Act without that being a review; appeals must be filed under Section 18 if available.
Point of law: Loans by financial institutions are granted from public money generated at the taxpayer’s expense. Such loan does not become the property of the person taking the loan, but retains its ....
The jurisdiction of the civil court is excluded in matters related to the classification of loan accounts as NPA under the SARFAESI Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.