IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, K. LAKSHMAN, JJ.
G. Ramachandra Rao and Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 36489, 37131, 41996 of 2017, 5776, 6094, 6474, 9959, 14748, 16994, 35119, 35667, 35986 of 2018
Decided On : 22-11-2019
Constitution of India, 1950 - Website of the Irrigation Department - Screening Committee - Challenged zonal seniority - Petitioners claim to be appointed to posts of Assistant Executive Engineer in Irrigation and CAD Department presently Water Resources Department combined State of A.P. on selection by the A.P. Public Service Commission to different zones pursuant to Notifications issued during different years - provisional seniority list of AEEs working in different units/zones was issued by Circular Memo No. RC/ENC/and was put up on website of Irrigation Department -
Finding of the Court:
State of Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Irrigation and CAD Department, Hyderabad and the State of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Water Resources - Department shall prepare seniority lists for all cadres Zone wise in respect of Zones falling within their respective territories and affect promotions to posts of Dy.EEs Zone wise and thereafter to the Statewide posts of EEs, SEs, CEs and Engineer-in-Chiefs - For a period of two months from today within which exercise is to be completed by the State of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary - Water Resources - Department and its Engineer-in-Chief (AW), Water Resources Department, State of A.P. Vijayawada and State of Rep. by it’s Special Chief Secretary, Irrigation and CAD Department, Hyderabad, status quo as on date shall be maintained in all respects -
Result: Ordered Accordingly
ORDER :
1. The main issue in these cases is whether posts and promotions in each Zone as per the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975 (for short ‘the Presidential Order, 1975’ issued under Article 371-D of the Constitution of India) are “water-tight compartments” and if so, whether the said principle has been violated by the State of Andhra Pradesh or the State of Telangana.
2. In this batch of Writ Petitions (i) the principles involved in the preparation of Seniority List in the cadre of Deputy Executive Engineer (for short Dy.EE) applied by the Engineer-in-Chief, Administrative Wing, Water Resources Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, (ii) the Seniority Lists issued by him on different dates during July to November, 2017 and (iii) also consequential promotions effected, based on the said seniority lists, to the cadres of Executive Engineers (EEs), Superintending Engineers (SEs), Chief Engineers (CEs) and Engineer-in Chief (ENC) in both the State of A.P. and the State of Telangana, are in question.
(A) Brief facts relating to the petitioners and prior history leading to the filing of these cases:
3. The petitioners claim to be appointed to the posts of Assistant Executive Engineer (for short ‘AEE’) in Irrigation and CAD Department (presently Water Resources Department) in the erstwhile combined State of A.P. on selection by the A.P. Public Service Commission to different zones pursuant to Notifications issued during different years which are as under:
| S. No. | Name | Notification | DOA | Unit | |
| 1 | A. Trinadham | 1990 | 2.4.1993 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 5776/2018 |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 2 | Md. Amzad Hussain | 1987 | 9.5.1989 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 6094/2018 |
| Zone-V | |||||
| 3 | B. Gopala Krishna Rao | 1990 | 22.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 4 | Saragadam Jagadeeshwar Rao | 1990 | 13.4.1993 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 6474/2018 |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 5 | G. Srinivasa Rao | 1990 | 7.4.1993 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 9959/2018 |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 6 | G. Ramachandra Rao | 1990 | 15.4.1992 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 37131/2017 |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 7 | K. Ramana | 1990 | 2.4.1993 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 8 | M. Bhaskara Rao | 1990 | 17.5.1992 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 9 | B. Srihari | 1990 | 8.4.1993 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 10 | Sambangi Sugunakara Rao | 1987 | 3.5.1989 | Zone-VI | W.P. No. 41996/2017 |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 11 | Peela Appala Naidu | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-VI | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 12 | Ponnada Sudhakara Rao | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 13 | Reddy Venkata Satyanarayana | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 14 | Dola Tirumala Rao | 1987 | 3.5.1989 | Zone-IV | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 15 | Dulam Rama Gopal | 1987 | 3.5.1989 | Zone-V | |
| Zone-I | |||||
| 16 | B.Venkateswarulu | 1985 | 20.1.1986 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 35119/2018 |
| 17 | S. Narasimha Rao | 1985 | 16.1.1986 | Zone-V | |
| 18 | B. Shanker | 1987 | 29.4.1989 | Zone-V | |
| 19 | K. Shyamsunder | 1985 | 27.1.1986 | Zone-V | |
| 20 | V. Ajay Kumar | 1987 | 1.3.1989 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 35667/2018 |
| 21 | K.S.S. Chandrasekhar | 1987 | 1.4.1989 | Zone-V | |
| 22 | T. Srinivasa Rao Gupta | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 14748/2018 |
| 23 | A. Amarender Reddy | 1990 | 20.3.1993 | Zone-V | |
| 24 | V. Srinivas | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| 25 | N. Venkateswarlu | 1985 | 1.2.1986 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 16994/2018 |
| 26 | N. Sreedhar | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| 27 | Mohd. Azmal Khan | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | W.P. No. 35986/2018 |
| 28 | Mittapalli Ramesh | 1990 | 1.4.1992 | Zone-V | |
| 29 | D. Srinivasulu |
| 1995 | Zone-I | W.P. No. 36489/2017 |
| 30 | B. Yesubabu | Zone-II | |||
| 31 | B. Rambabu | Zone-I | |||
(a) The zonal seniority lists in the cadres of (i) AEEs, (ii) Dy.EEs and (iii) State-wide integrated seniority list of Dy.EEs:
4. The provisional seniority list of AEEs working in different units/zones was issued by Circular Memo No. RC/ENC/A3/24018/2012-1 da
Balram Gupta vs. Union of India
D. Vishnu Murthy and Others vs. Government of A.P. 2016 (13) SCC 111
Government of A.P. and Others vs. A. Suryanarayana and Others
Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. P. Vema Reddy
G. Raja Babu vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Malcom Lawrence Cecil D'souza vs. Union of India
Rabindranath Bose and Others vs. Union of India and Others
S. Prakasha Rao vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Union of India and Another vs. Hemraj Singh Chauhan and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.