2022 Supreme(Telangana) 360
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Bheemrao Jaligma and Others – Petitioners
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 2648, 3755, 4235, 4248, 4256, 4257, 4855, 5107, 5577, 5666, 6194, 7420, 8722 of 2021, 23785, 24837, 25292, 25303, 25360, 33025 of 2022
Decided On : 08-11-2022
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Pratusha Bopanna, Vardhineni Krishna Mohan, B. Nalin Kumar.
For the Respondents: K. Lakshmi Narasimha, Kalpana Ekbote.
Point of Law: Doctrine of reasonableness cannot be invoked to amend/alter/modify terms of contract to favour one party.
Headnote:
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 12, 14 - Wealth Act, 1957 - Section 34AB, 23 - Equality before Law - Empowers all High Courts of India to issue the writ - State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India - Registration of valuers - Whether inclusion of a stipulation mandating submission of a letter of indemnity to seek empanelment as a valuer with Respondent offends Article 14 of Constitution of India - It is trite law that in contractual matters involving the State or its instrumentality, there is a duty on the State or such instrumentality to act reasonably and fairly.
Findings of the Court:
Court are of opinion that it cannot be said that objective of including an indemnity clause in its terms of empanelment is arbitrary or unreasonable and without any purpose whatsoever - Looking to nature and purpose of this contractual stipulation, it would be within Order passed discretion of SBI in matters of contract to insist on its inclusion as it wants to uniformly hold valuers to a higher and more exacting standard - SBI is entitled to seek inclusion of indemnity clause in terms of empanelment and terms of contract with valuer - Court also find that SBI is entitled to add such terms to its Agreements with valuers in larger public interest given nature of decisions that SBI will make based on such valuations given by valuers.
Result: Petitions dismissed.
ORDER :
1. The lis involved in the present batch of writ petitions is similar and therefore, the same were heard together and are decided vide the following common order.
2. Heard Ms. Pratusha Bopanna, learned counsel representing Sri Vardhineni Krishna Mohan, Sri B. Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for petitioners, Dr. K. Lakshmi Narasimha and Smt. Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsels appearing for respondent Banks. Perused the record.
3. The Petitioners in the writ petitions are registered valuers who challenge the clauses/correspondences which impose a mandatory condition for valuers seeking empanelment to execute a Letter of Indemnity in favour of the Respondent Banks on the ground that the same is arbitrary, unconscionable, illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
4. The impugned clauses/correspondences require registered valuers seeking empanelment with the Respondent Banks to execute the following letter of indemnity:
(i) Letter of indemnity of Punjab National Bank.
LETTER OF INDEMNITY BY ENGINEERS/VALUERS
To
Name of the Bank,
..............................
Dear Sirs
In consideration of Name of the Bank (hereinafter called the ‘Bank’ which expression shall include its successors and assigns) empanelling me/us on that panel of approved Engineers and Valuers for the purpose of assessing the market value of the properties proposed to be taken as securities for the credit limits granted or to be granted by the Bank to its various borrowers, I/We jointly and severally, extend this letter of indemnity.
Whereas, by the letter of empanelment dated...............the bank has empanelled me/us on their panel of approved Engineers and Valuers for the purpose of assessing the market value of the properties proposed to be taken as securities for the credit limits granted/to be granted by the Bank. I/We jointly and severally agree as follows:
I/We declare that I/We have not been blacklisted/disqualified as per Section 34AB of Wealth Tax Act and would keep the Bank informed about disqualifications, if any, I have not suppressed any material facts from the Bank.
I/We shall duly and faithfully perform and discharge all the duties in the works entrusted by the Bank and in relation to the purposes of empanelment fairly without any favour and discrimination and I/We hereby undertake and agree to indemnify you, your successors and assigns at all times and from time to time and against all loss, damage and all actions. suits, proceedings, expenses, costs, charges and demands arising out of any act, lapses, defaults, negligence, errors, mistakes committed by me/us in performance of my/our professional obligations and I/We also hereby undertake and agree to pay to you on demand sums of money, costs, charges and expenses incurred in respect thereof and also to pay you interest on all such moneys at your ruling rate. We further agree that amount demanded by the Bank shall be conclusive against us.
Yours Faithfully,
Signature
(Name and Official Seal of the Approved Valuer):
(ii) Letter of indemnity of Central bank of India.
To
Central Bank of India
...................................
Dear Sirs,
In consideration of Name of the Bank (hereinafter called the ‘Bank’ which expression shall include its successors and assigns) empanelling me/us on that panel of approved Engineers and Valuers for the purpose of assessing the market value of the properties proposed to be taken as securities for the credit limits granted or to be granted by the Bank to its various borrowers, I/We jointly and severally, extend this letter of indemnity.
Whereas, by the letter of empanelment dated...............the bank has empanelled me/us on their panel of approved Engineers and Valuers for the purpose of assessing the market value of the properties proposed to be taken as securities for the credit limits granted/to be granted by the Bank. I/We jointly and severally agree as follows:
I/We shall duly and faithfully perform and discharge all the duties in the works entrusted b