SUREPALLI NANDA
B. Mallikarjuna Rao – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I.
2. This writ petition is filed to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned Memo No. 33518/Ser.II/A2/2012, Home Department, dated 24-05-2016 and its consequential Proceedings C.No. 33/A6-1/2008-2016, D.O.No. 1545/2016, dated 24-06-2016 issued by the 1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, contrary to the Fundamental Rules and also subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution and consequently hold that the suspension period of the applicant from 05-12-2007 to 07-03-2010 is to be treated as on duty for all the purposes with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances, seniority and promotion etc.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
a) The petitioner was appointed as A.R. Police Constable with effect from 02-02-1992 and was later converted to Civil Police Constable during the year 2014 and since then continuing in the said post.
b) When the petitioner was working as AR Police Constable in Nalgonda, he was placed under suspension vide Proc. C.No. 3594/A6/2007, D.O.No. 2587/2007 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.