UJJAL BHUYAN, SUREPALLI NANDA
Kavvampally Budamma – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Surepalli Nanda, J.]
1. Heard Mr. S.Satyam Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Parsa Ananth Nageshwara Rao, learned Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for the Respondents.
2. This Writ Appeal has been preferred assailing the legality and validity of the Order dt. 15-02-2007 passed by the Learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.No.2903/2007 filed by the Appellants herein.
3. Appellants herein in the present Writ Appeal had filed W.P.No.2903 of 2007 seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing the impugned order bearing No.B/1580/2006-7, dt. 23-09-2006 seeking to resume the land in Sy.No.439/31 admeasuring Ac.1.08gts.situated at Chintakunta Village, Karimnagar as arbitrary, illegal and to set aside the same.
4. Order impugned in W.P.No.2903/2007 reads as under :
In the ref.1st cited, an extent of Ac.1.08 gts., of land in Sy.No.439/31, situated at Chintakunta Village, Karimnagar Mandal, was assigned to one Sri Kavvampally Durgaiah, S/o. Sailoo, R/o. Chintakunta Village for the purpose of agriculture, subject to certain conditions. In the ref. 2nd cited, a show cause notice was issued to Kavvampally Bhood
Venkatamma v. City Improvement of Trust Board, Mysore
Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Friends Co operative. Housing Society Limited
Tukaram Kanna Joshi v. M.I.D.C.)
Bidi Supply Co. v. Union of India
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Hindustan Times v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.