Back
UJJAL BHUYAN, C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
Prof. A. Vinayak Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Ujjal Bhuyan, J.
Heard Mr. S.Satyam Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner; Mr. B.S.Prasad, learned Advocate General for the State of Telangana representing respondent Nos.1 and 2; Mr. Ram Gopal Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Public Service Commission, respondent No.3; Mr. B.Timoty, learned counsel for respondent No.4; Mr. P.Somasekhar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5; Mr. Srinivasa Rao Maddiraju, learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7; Mr. Venkat Reddy Kodumuri, learned counsel for respondent No.8; and Mr. A.Sudershan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for respondent No.9.
2. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as a public interest litigation (PIL) to declare the appointment of respondents No.4 to 9 as members of Telangana State Public Service Commission vide G.O.Ms.No.108 dated 19.05.2021 issued by the General Administration (Services-A) Department, Government of Telangana as arbitrary and illegal, being violative of Regulations 3(2)(a) and (b) of Telangana State Public Service Commission Regulations, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Regulations’) and thereafter to set aside such appointments.
The court found that the chairman and members of the Haryana Public Service Commission misbehaved by failing to maintain integrity, refusing to cooperate with investigations, and engaging in arbitrar....
"Doctrine of Pleasure" has its genesis under common law - A public servant could be dismissed from service by Crown at its pleasure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment made under Article 316(1) is complete and removal requires adherence to Article 317. The court held that the recall of the app....
Public interest litigations in service matters should not be entertained, and the provision of review is not to scrutinize the correctness of the decision rendered but to correct any error visible on....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for judicial dominance in the Selection Committee and the need to maintain the judicial primacy over the appointment process for th....
(1) Constitutionality of Rules stipulating minimum qualifying marks in viva voce test as a part of selection criteria for appointment to District Judiciary in the States of Bihar and Gujarat respecti....
The court holds that it cannot interfere with the selection made by the Selection Committee unless there is arbitrariness or statutory aberration. The court emphasizes the importance of maintaining t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
