IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J.
Nagaram Anjaiah and Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 16935, 17710, 17764 of 2024
Decided On : 19-08-2024
Discontinuation - Law Officers - G.O. Ms. No. 187, Instruction No. 9 - The court upheld the government's authority to terminate Law Officers' services under the provisions of G.O. Ms. No. 187, emphasizing the contractual nature of their appointments and the absence of a vested right to continue.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, appointed as Law Officers for a three-year term, were discontinued en masse by a government order, leading to claims of arbitrary action and violation of constitutional rights.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the government acted within its rights to terminate the Law Officers' services as per the applicable instructions, and that the petitioners did not possess a legally enforceable right to continue in their positions.
Issues: Whether the en masse discontinuation of Law Officers by the government was arbitrary and violative of their rights under the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the relationship between the Law Officers and the government was contractual, allowing for termination without cause, and that the government had the discretion to appoint its counsel.
Result: The writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the government's decision to discontinue the Law Officers.
ORDER :
1. Since the issue in all these writ petitions is same, they are being disposed of, at the admission stage itself, by this common order with the consent of both sides.
2.1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions were appointed as Government Pleaders and Special Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, Additional Government Pleaders (hereinafter referred to as ‘Law Officers’) in various Courts of the District Judiciary during the years 2021 to 2023 for a period of three (3) years on payment of monthly honorarium. By the impugned G.O. Rt. No. 354, Law Department, dated 26.06.2024, the Government has discontinued services of the Law Officers herein and others whose names are shown in the list annexed thereto.
2.2. It was stated in G.O. Rt. No. 354 that as per proviso to Instruction No. 9 of the Telangana Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Instructions 2000 issued in G.O. Ms. No. 187, Law Department, dated 06.12.2000, the Law Officers are entitled to one month honorarium in lieu of notice. Accordingly, the concerned District Collectors were requested to pay one month honorarium to the Law Officers and make necessary incharge arrangements by placing eligible Advocates as incharge of the post for a period of six (6) months or till regular appointments are made by the Government whichever is earlier. The District Collectors were also directed to furnish panels consisting of five (5) Advocates in each panel forthwith for making regular appointment of new Law Officers. In pursuance of G.O. Rt. No. 354 on petitioners and others being discontinued, consequential individual orders have been issued appointing new Law Officers on temporary basis to various Courts in the District Judiciary.
2.3. The case of the petitioners is that they are appointed on a tenure post; they cannot be discontinued en masse without giving opportunity of hearing; there is no reason to discontinue their services except for change of Government; they have legitimate expectation to continue till the expiry of their tenure; the impugned Government Order is patently arbitrary, mala fide and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution as the services of the Law Officers are discontinued for extraneous consideration for the only reason of change of Government.
3.1. The case of the respondents is that the Government has discontinued services of 55 Law Officers viz., Government Pleaders, Additional Government Pleaders, Special Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders and Special Counsel working in the Courts subordinate to the High Court for the State of Telangana who are under first or second term in the entire State in exercise of the powers conferred by Instruction No. 9 in G.O. Ms. No. 187, in public interest and for effective implementation of the policy of the Government. The concerned District Collectors were requested to make necessary arrangements immediately by placing eligible Advocates as incharge of the post for a period of six (6) months or till regular appointments are made by the Government, whichever is earlier. Consequently, incharge arrangements have been made.
3.2. It is submitted that the Law Officers do not have any ‘legally enforceable right’ or ‘vested right’ for their appointment / continuation. There is no violation of statutory or Constitutional right. The terms of appointment and conditions of services of the Law Officers are purely guided by the executive instructions under G.O. Ms. No. 187. The order of appointment of the Law Officers clearly stipulates that they are appointed ‘for a term of three years from the date of assumption of charge of the post or till termination of their services whichever is earlier.’ The Law Officers who have accepted such appointment cannot claim any legitimate expectation to continue.
3.3. It is submitted that the discretion of the State Government in engagement of its Law Officers for effective adjudication, administration of justice and defending the
Government of Andhra Pradesh v. Smt. Pushpendar Kaur
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Law Department v. Battarusetti Chenna Kesawarao
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P. 1991 (1) SCC 212 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 742
The court established that Law Officers serve under a contractual relationship with the government, which has the discretion to terminate their services without cause.
Engagement of Advocates as Law Officers is a professional arrangement, not subject to Writ Jurisdiction under Articles 14 and 16, affirming the Government's discretion to appoint and terminate withou....
The government holds discretion to terminate appointments of Public Prosecutors without inquiry or specific reasons, provided procedural mandates of applicable instructions are adhered to, maintainin....
The District Government Counsel do not hold civil posts or employee status under Article 311; their engagement is contractual, terminable at will without notice, and does not attract constitutional p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.