K. SARATH
Syed Badruddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary Agriculture and Co-operation Department – Respondent
ORDER :
(K. Sarath, J.) :
This writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by the respondent No.3 vide Proceeding R.C.No.1413/2016-WS dated 20.06.2024 in disqualifying the petitioner from the post of Chairman of the respondent No.5-Society in terms of provision of Section 32(3) of the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act,1964 and devolving the powers of the Chairman on Vice-Chairman of the Society until conduct of election to the post of Chairman of the Society as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel for Sri Girija Shankar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation and Sri J. Ashvini Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.6.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.5-Society functioning has been governed by the provisions of the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act’) read with Bye- Laws of the respondent No.5-Society. The affairs of the said Society have been managed by the Board of Directors consisting of 12 Directors, who were elected among the Members of the Society. Out of the 12 elected Directors, one Director has to
Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and others
The failure to conduct mandatory meetings as per Section 32(3) of the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 results in automatic disqualification from the post of Chairman.
Disqualification of directors under Section 61 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act is automatic, but the Registrar must judiciously consider circumstances when determining the duration of disqualif....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict adherence to the statutory provisions for convening the Annual General Body Meeting (AGBM) of cooperative societies, as mandated by the ....
Provisions of Section 76(B(2) would stand somewhat on different footing. This Court when is taking a view that action could be initiated under subsection (2) only after passing order of removal, issu....
Sub-Rule (8) of Rule 60 was not attracted in such a case as the meeting was required to be postponed due to disturbance and secondly, the date of the postponed meeting was to be decided by the member....
The authority to appoint a Supervisor under Section 29-G of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act is valid, and resolutions passed by a majority of Directors cannot be annulled based solely on all....
The Registrar must consider the reasonability of the excuse offered by the affected party before imposing disqualification or penalty under Section 75 (5) of the Act, 1960.
The appointment of an Administrator for a cooperative society cannot extend beyond one year without elections, infringing on statutory governance mandates.
The court established that the timely conduct of elections for office bearers in cooperative societies is a legal obligation, not subject to arbitrary delays.
The court affirmed the validity of the Committee's elections under the Societies Registration Act, emphasizing adherence to bye-laws and authority established through prior judicial rulings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.