SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 652

C. V. BHASKAR REDDY
Ambramma – Appellant
Versus
Sidramappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED
For the Respondent: M.V. PRATAP KUMAR

ORDER:

This revision is directed against the orders dated 27.07.2023 passed in I.A.No.74 of 2023 in O.S.No.213 of 2021 by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narayanpet. The petitioners herein have filed an application vide I.A.No.74 of 2023 under Order I Rule 10 of CPC seeking to implead them as party defendants in O.S.No.213 of 2021 instituted by the respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiff Nos.1 and 2, for declaration and perpetual injunction.

2. The brief facts of the case that are necessary for disposal of the present revision are stated as under:

3. The case of the petitioners/proposed defendants 3 and 4 is that their father Sri Sidramappa was shown as protected tenant over the land in Sy.Nos.302 to 308 situated at Alampally village of Krishna Mandal, Narayanpet District. The said Sidramappa has got three wives i.e. Smt. Eramma, Gangamma and Kanjanamma. The Eramma and Gangamma died issueless. The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the children of Kanjanamma and Sidramappa. The plaintiff No.1 is son of Chenbasappa and plaintiff No.2 is his wife. The defendant No.1 in the subject suit is the own sister of plaintiff No.1 and defendant No.2 is the husband of the defendant No.1. The subject su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top