IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, J.
M/s. Devashree Ispat Private Limited - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana rep.by its Principal Secretary, Energy Dept., Hyderabad & others - Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 7130, 7148, 7168, 7183, 7185, 7189, 7192, 7202, 7207, 7208, 7236, 7237, 7240, 7310, 7313, 7363, 7376, 7462, 7465, 7466, 7478, 7480, 7531, 7540, 7550, 7552, 7682, 7724, 7778, 7811, 8001, 8011, 8019, 8025, 8116, 8146, 8307, 8521, 8621, 8648, 8712, 8725, 8742, 8881, 8891, 8897, 8914, 8923, 8959, 9108, 9204, 9216, 9230, 9232, 9233, 9424, 9443, 9458, 9531, 9582, 9599, 9671, 9702, 9899, 11413,13885 of 2020
Decided On : 18-01-2021
A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code) Regulation, 2004 - Section - 2(c) and 3 (4) - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 43, 62, 108 and 181 - Epidemic Disease Act, 1897 - Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 18 - Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Section - 72 Section - Contract Act, 1872 - Agreement to do impossible act - Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening - COVID - 19, PANDEMIC - Industrial activity/commercial activity - Non-working charges - Minimum Demand Charges - Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening - Twin Part Tariff System - Levy of maximum demand charges – Challenged - Petitions are Companies/Partnership Firms/Proprietary concerns - They are Manufacturing Units/Commercial Establishments. All the petitioners have obtained High Tension (HT) Service Connections from respondents’ authorities with a contracted maximum demand.
Finding of the court: TSSPDCL without appreciating said aspects, levying maximum demand charges and without considering requests of consumers that they have to collect maximum demand charges on pro-rata basis i.e., working and non-working days (closure days) - Said approach of the TSSPDCL is unsustainable – Notification has declared COVID-19 pandemic as a ‘force majeure’- Due to COVID-19 pandemic, Central Government and State Governments have issued various orders from time to time declaring lockdown of various activities including industrial activity under the provisions of Act, 2005 - On account of said mandatory orders, according to petitioners, they have closed down their industrial operations - Said lockdown restrictions were extended from time to time by both Central and State Governments - Action of TSSPDCL in levying and demanding minimum charges, both on maximum demand and energy during closure period on account of COVID-19 restrictions from petitioners - HT Consumers as illegal.
Result: Writ Petitions are allowed
ORDER :
Out of the above Writ Petitions, Writ Petition Nos.7130, 7148, 7168, 7183, 7189, 7192, 7202, 7207, 7208, 7310, 7313, 7363, 7376, , 7462, 7466, 7478, 7531, 7540, 7724, 7811, 8001, 8011, 8019, 8116, 8712, 8725, 8742, 8881, 8891, 8897, 8923, 9204, 9232, 9424, 9443, 9458, 9531, 9599, 9671, 9702, 9899, 11413 and 13885 of 2020 relate to challenging the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not collecting maximum demand charges for the month of April, 2020 on pro-rata basis viz., working and nonworking periods (closure days) as highly illegal and arbitrary.
2. Whereas, Writ Petition Nos.7185, 7236, 7237, 7240, 7465, 7480, 7550, 7552, 7682, 7778, 8025, 8146, 8307, 8521, 8621, 8648, 8914, 8959, 9108, 9216, 9230, 9233 and 9582 of 2020 relate to challenging the action of respondents in levying and demanding the amount under various head as wholly illegal and arbitrary.
3. CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONERS (MAXIMUM):
(ii) The Telangana State Electricity Regulation Commission (TSERC) has approved the general terms and conditions of the licenses w.e.f. 01.01.2006;
(iii) Due to COVID-19, pandemic, both the Central and the State Governments have issued various orders from time to time declaring the lockdown of various activities including industrial activity/commercial activity under the provisions of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (for short ‘Act, 2005’). On account of the said mandatory orders, according to the petitioners, they have closed down their industrial operations and commercial activities w.e.f. 23.03.2020. The said lockdown restrictions were extended from time to time by both the Central and State Governments.
(iv) Due to the said lockdown restrictions imposed by the Central and State Governments on account of COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioners herein could not operate its industrial activities/commercial activities. There are penal provisions in the proceedings issued by the State and Central Governments and, therefore, the petitioners were compelled to close down its industrial activities and Units.
(v) All the petitioners being subjected to Twin Part Tariff System (TPTS) i.e., maximum demand charges and energy charges.
(vi) For the consumption month of April, 2020, the meter reading was taken by the Officials of the respondents’ authorities on 17.03.2020. But, 23.03.2020, on which date, the Central and State Governments have passed orders commencing the lockdown. During the said period, the recorded maximum demand was less than the contracted maximum demand.
(vii) Clause - 2.2.2.35 of the General Terms and Conditions of Supply (GTCS), deals with “Maximum Demand” which is as under:
“twice the maximum number of kilo volt - ampere hours (KVAH) delivered at the point of supply to the consumer during any consecutive 30 minutes during the month in respect of consumer having contracted demand of less than 4000 kVA. However, for the consumer having contracted demand of 4000 kVA and above the maximum demand means four times the maximum number of KVAH delivered at the point of supply to the consumer during any consecutive 15 minutes during the month.”
(viii) The meter provided by respondent No.2 in the petitioners’ Industrial Unites/Commercial Establishments records both maximum demand and energy used by the petitioners. The maximum demand is that it is four times the maximum number of KVAH at the point of supply to the consumer during any consecutive 15 minutes during the month in respect of the said consumer. Once it records a higher demand, the meter gets stuck up
Alopi Parshad & Sons Ltd v. Union of India
Bihar State Electricity Board v. Allied Refractories (Pvt.) Ltd.
Bihar State v. Dhanawat Rice & Oil Mills
Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Govindbhai Gordhanbhai Patel v. Gulam Abbas Mulla Allibhai
Grindwell Norton Ltd v. A.P.S.E. Board, Hyderabad
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission v. Reliance Energy Ltd
Northern India Iron and Steel Company v. State of Haryana
Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adarsh Textiles
Prestige Lights v. State Bank of India
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Renu v. District and Sessions Judge, TIS Hazri
Satyabrata Ghose vs. Mugneeram Bangur and Company
Smt. Sushila Devi v. Hari Singh
Waryam Steel Castings Private Limited v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (2017) 8 SCC 190
All shops, commercial establishments, offices, factories, workshops, godowns etc. shall close their operations. However, production and manufacturing units which require continuous process such as ph....
The court upheld the Electricity Board's right to charge a minimum demand despite circumstances limiting actual consumption, affirming the principles of reasonableness and fairness under statutory ob....
A consumer is obligated to pay minimum monthly charges regardless of electrical supply interruptions unless the contractual agreement explicitly allows for a reduction.
The Electricity Board must adhere to statutory notice requirements before disconnection and cannot recover charges post-disconnection without such compliance.
Electricity Supply Agreement – Contract cannot be amended unilaterally – Unilateral addition or alteration of a contract can never be foisted upon an unwilling party, nor can a party to agreement be ....
Point of Law : Issues involving disputed questions of fact, not amenable to adjudication under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is not open to the Court - just as it was not open to the e....
(1) Recovery of dues – Limitation period of two (2) years prescribed for recovery of dues under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003 would apply to liabilities arising under 2003 Act, and not prior to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.