Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Voora Jagadishwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
Writ Petition No. 31927 of 2024
1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“…declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in non-entertaining the registration process and documentation on the plot of the Petitioner to an extent of 267 Sq.Yards in Plot No.125 in Survey Nos.68, 79 and 80 which is situated at Nadergul Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under the Nadergul Grampanchayath, Ranga Reddy District is illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to entertain the registration on the plot of the Petitioner to an extent of 267 Sq Yards in Plot No.125 in Survey Nos.68, 79 and 80 which is situated at Nadergul Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (subject property).”
2. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner claims to be owner, possessor and enjoyer of open plot (referred as subject property) acquired by way of registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.9793 of 1985 dated 02.08.1985.The said document was registered before the Sub-Registrar Office, Champapet, i.e., re
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration procedure mandated under the Registration Act was followed by the 2nd respondent, and the court emphasized the importance of ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
