IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Nidigonda Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“to declare that the action of the respondent registration authorities in not entertaining and registering the sale deed which may he presented by the petitioner in respect of the flat bearing of Flat No.B-103, in First Floor bearing Municipal No 9-12/13/103, (PTI No.1197018379) name of the Project Daffodils Block No.B of Aakruthi Townshiop with built up area of 2300 Sft including common area and car parking area 100Sft along with proportionate undivided share of land admeasuring 81 Sq.Yds or 67.71 Sq Mtrs Out of total admeasuring 23304 Sq.Yds or 19482 Sq Mtrs constructed in Survey Nos.149 and 150 Situated at Boduppal Village under Boduppal Municipal Corporation Medipally Mandal MedchalMalkajgiri District S R O Uppal on the ground that the said property is part of the waqf gazette notification dated 09.02.1989 at Sl No.2746 is arbitrary and illegal since the said gazette notification was set aside by this court in 2002 3 ALT 439 B Gowra Reddy Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh and the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in 1 A No 1 of 2024 in W P No 19600 of 2024 dated 31 07 2024 and in W P No 27974 of 2024 dated 14 10 2024 an
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
The Registering Officer must verify original documents for property registration to prevent fraud, and parties claiming rights must establish their claims before a competent court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.