Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J
Chimanlal Suresh Kumar Textiles Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court emphasizes mandatory requirements (Para 12) |
| 3. petitioner must present executed documents (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed (Para 26) |
ORDER :
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
Questioning the action of the respondent No.3, Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad, in refusing to receive the documents presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.3.00 gts., under Sy.Nos.725/1 Part, situated at Shamshabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject property’) without assigning any reasons, petitioner filed the present writ petition.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of the subject property having purchased the same from one Sri Vinay Kumar and another vide a registered sale deed bearing Document No.2341 of 2006 dated 18.12.2005. It is submitted that originally one late Sri G.Sayanna was the Pattedar and possessor of the subject lands including other lands and his name was recorded since the year 1954 in all concerned revenue records like Adangal/
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
The Registering Officer must verify original documents for property registration to prevent fraud, and parties claiming rights must establish their claims before a competent court.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
