IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUJOY PAUL, RENUKA YARA
Vangala Vishnu Priya – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutionality of reservation rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for including bsf under reservation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. counterarguments concerning classification of forces. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. examination of the legality of classification. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. justification of the challenged rules. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
ORDER :
Sujoy Paul, ACJ
In these petitions, the petitioners, dependents of Border Security Force (‘BSF’) Personnel, have called in question the constitutionality of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh/Telangana Unaided Non-minority Professional Institutions (Regulations of Admissions into Under Graduate Medical and Dental Professional Courses) Rules, 2007, (‘Rules of 2007’) and the Telangana Medical and Dental Colleges Admission, (Admission into MBBS & BDS Courses) Rules, 2017 (‘Rules of 2017’), which confine the reservation of 1% seats for children of ex-servicemen and service personnel of three wings of Armed Forces viz., Army, Navy and Air Force and who domiciled in the Telangana State based on the permanent address/home-town d
Budhan Choudhry v. State of Bihar
Amandeep Singh Saran v. State of Chattisgarh
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas
State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh
The classification between Armed Forces and Central Armed Police Forces for admission reservations is constitutional, as it is based on reasonable differentiation and does not violate equal protectio....
Eligibility criteria for recruitment can be challenged only under circumstances showing arbitrariness or unreasonableness, with legislative discretion in defining categories being respected unless ma....
The court affirmed that the SOP for WDP admissions was valid and did not violate equality principles, as it adhered to established guidelines.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the term 'Defence Personnel' in the context of admission criteria for Sainik School, emphasizing the specific eligibility req....
Reservation for Ex-Servicemen is a special reservation under Article 16(1) and is a horizontal reservation, constituting a reservation within reservation. The intent of horizontal reservation is to i....
The court upheld the University’s reservation policy for Armed Forces personnel, affirming that inclusion of Para-Military and Police Personnel is consistent with directives from both the Ministry of....
The court upheld the constitutional validity of category-wise horizontal reservation for ex-servicemen, affirming it does not violate merit principles or representation objectives.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the impact of subsequent government orders on the applicability of historical reservation policies, specifically G.O.Ms.No.1142 dated 30.06.1979....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.