Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.LAKSHMAN
Bukka Prakash Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership and construction permits (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court's procedural observations (Para 5 , 7 , 17 , 19) |
| 3. natural justice and dispute resolution (Para 8 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. verification and timelines under tg-bpass act (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 16) |
| 5. adherence to the tg-bpass act timelines and provisions. (Para 14) |
| 6. dismissal of writ petition with liberty to appeal (Para 21) |
ORDER :
K. Lakshman, J.
Heard Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M. Krishna, learned standing counsel appearing for 2nd respondent. Perused the record.
2. Petitioners herein are claiming that they are absolute owners and possessors of Plot Nos.39 to 49, total admeasuring 1814 square yards vide Sale deed bearing document No.7430 of 2012 dated 31.12.2012 and Plot Nos.50 to 53 i.e., total extent 748 square yards vide Sale Deed No.7431 of 2012 dated 31.12.2012 and Plot bearing Nos.54 to 61 i.e., total extent 1080 square yards vide Sale deed No.7432 of 2012. They have also obtained 25 building permit orders from 2nd respondent, the details of the same are specifically mentioned in impugned speaking order dated 15.02.2025. All are dated 10.07.2023. Th
Natural justice must be upheld in administrative proceedings, and disputes of ownership should be resolved before competent authorities, with the speaking order being appealable.
Judicial review cannot adjudicate property title claims while assessing administrative actions; these should be properly contested in court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
