SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.LAKSHMAN
SSPDL Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : N SASIKALA
For the Respondent: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

ORDER :

K. Lakshman, J.

Heard Mrs. N. Sasikala, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr. B. Mahender Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.4. The petitioner filed a Memo vide USR No. dated not pressing this writ petition against respondent No.3.

2. CASE OF THE PETITIONER

i) The petitioner had undertaken a project to develop low-cost housing for the benefit of employees of BHEL. The Housing Units were sold to respondent No.4, which in turn, allocated them to the employees of BHEL by taking all necessary permissions including layout approval from HMDA.

ii) In the sanctioned layout plan, dated 03.07.2014 and layout permit dated 21.06.2022, it has categorically mentioned that no road exists. The area in question is specifically designated for ‘future expansion’.

iii) It is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs. 1.02 guntas in Survey No.191/36, situated at Kollur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, on the strength of a registered sale deed bearing document No.3482 of 2017, dated 03.03.2018 executed by M/s. SSPDL Properties Limited, its sister concern. Thus, it has been in cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top