SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 647

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUJOY PAUL, RENUKA YARA
Bigleap Technologies And Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri Karan Talwar, Sri M.V.J.K.Kumar, Sri M.Uma Shankar, Sri M. Naga Deepak, Sri A.V.A.Siva Kartikeya, Sri Raja Shekar Rao Salvaji, Sri P. Venkata Prasad, learned counsel appearing for Sri Md.Shabaz, Sri Mohd.Mukhairuddin, Sri P. Karthik Ramana, Sri S.Suri Babu, Smt. S.Rama Lakshmi, Sri Singam Srinivasa Rao, Sri Kailash Nath P.S.S., Sri Srinarayan Toshniwal, Sri K.P.Amarnath Reddy and Sri Md.Asrar, Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for, Ms.Yammanuru Siri Reddy, Sri V.Veeresham, Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, Sri M.Uma Shankar, learned counsel, appearing for Sri Puppala Bharat Nandan
For the Respondent: Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax assisted by, Sri T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader., Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Sri B.Mukherjee, learned counsel represeintng, Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India., Sri C. Vishwanath, learned counsel

ORDER :

Sujoy Paul, ACJ

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the show-cause notices and final orders which admittedly do not contain physical or digital signatures of the Proper Officer, although the impugned show-cause notices and final orders were placed on the portal.

Contention of the Petitioners:-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners commenced their arguments by placing reliance on the judgment of coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s. Silver Oak Villas LLP v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), [2024 (4) TMI 367-THC]. It is submitted that the view taken in the said judgment was consistently followed in several matters. Therefore, in absence of any physical or digital signature on the impugned show-cause notices and orders, the same cannot sustain judicial scrutiny.

Contention of the Respondents:-

3. Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, at the outset, fairly admitted that the impugned show- cause notices and orders do not contain physical or digital signatures. However, absence of signature will not cause any dent to the said show-cause notices or orders, if the scheme of The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top