SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1622

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
T. MADHAVI DEVI, J.
Boya Mareppa - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Telangana - Respondent
Writ Petition No.20758 of 2025
Decided On : 25-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P Chakravarthy
For the Respondent: GP For Panchayat Raj Rural Dev

Officials are mandated to remove encroachments from public roads as per statutory requirements, ensuring protection and identification of public cart tracks.

Headnote:(A) Telangana Panchayat Raj Act - Section 92 - A.P. (Telangana) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F - Writ of Mandamus - Petition for declaring inaction of officials on encroachment of a public cart track as illegal - The petitioner sought restoration of a 33 feet road encroached by unofficial respondents despite several representations made to the officials - The petitioner claimed lawful ownership and peaceful possession of agricultural land abutting the cart track. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Public roads - Definition and related obligations of officials under the relevant statutes - The court reiterated the duty of the officials to take action against encroachment on public roads and emphasized the need for identifying and demarcating public cart tracks. (Paras 3-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, owner of agricultural land in the village, claimed an encroachment on a cart track by unofficial respondents, preventing him from using his land, despite numerous representations to officials seeking intervention. Survey reports conflicted with the petitioner’s claims.

Findings of Court:
The court found the petitioner’s ownership not in dispute, recognized the existence of the cart track on the village map, and directed official respondents to survey and protect the cart track.

Issues: Whether the officials are bound to protect the encroached cart track based on village map evidence and the adequacy of measures taken to address encroachments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the statutory provisions impose a duty on officials to remove encroachments from public roads and to act upon representations by aggrieved parties.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to officials for prompt action.

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus for encroachment protection. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counter affidavits contest existence of cart track. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. court's mandamus for demarcation of cart track. (Para 4 , 7 , 8)
4. writ petition disposed, no costs. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

T. MADHAVI DEVI, J.

In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not taking any steps against the unofficial respondents for encroachment of 33 feet of cart track which is in existence since time immemorial in between Survey Nos.457/E and 24 situated in Mittadoddi Village, Gattu Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District despite the petitioner’s representations dt.23.09.2024, 18.10.2024, 21.10.2024, 27.01.2025 and 04.03.2025, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the official respondents to act upon the representations of the petitioner and to take steps to restore the 33 feet cart track and to pass such other order or orders.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition are that the petitioner claims to be the absolute and lawful owner and pattedar of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1.37 guntas in Survey No.457/E having purchased the same from one Uppari Venkateswarlu vide registered sale deed bearing Document No.4704/2008 dt.12.08.2008. The pattadar pass book number of the petitioner is T02040110814 bearing Khata No.1450. It is stated that the schedule of the property shows that on the East it is bounded by Mittadoddi Chagadonne road and on the West it is bounded by land of one Eramma, mother of Veerender and on the North it is bounded by R&B Road and on the South it is bounded by land of one Timma Reddy and ever since the date of purchase, the petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. It is stated that after purchasing the land, the name of the petitioner was also mutated in revenue records and pattadar and title deed passbook was issued. It is stated that the unofficial respondents, on 09.10.2024, highhandedly started interfering and encroaching upon the boundary line between R&B Government road and the petitioner’s agricultural land and were not allowing the petitioner to plough his land in Survey No.457/E by dumping mud and laying shabad stones and trying to erect huts and buddies illegally by using men and muscle power. He claimed that the said land belongs to him. The petitioner therefore filed representations dt.23.09.2024, 18.10.2024, 21.10.2024, 27.01.2025 and 04.03.2025 to the official respondents about the encroachment and also the attitude of the unofficial respondents. It is submitted that survey was conducted on 26.10.2024 and 18.01.2025 by the Mandal Surveyor, Ghattu Mandal and boundaries were fixed. However, the unofficial respondents were again encroaching the 33 feet road. It is submitted that even as per the village map, 33 feet is shown as cart track, but the official respondents, in spite of the representations, have not taken any steps for the protection of the 33 feet cart track and prevention of encroachment. It is alleged that the unofficial respondents have thus occupied 33 feet cart track in between Survey Nos.457/E and 24 and thereby causing trouble and hardship to the petitioner and his family members and therefore, the petitioner is constrained to file this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the official respondents to take action against the unofficial respondents and to restore the 33 feet cart track road. Along with the Writ Petition, the petitioner has filed copies of the representations filed by him and also copies of the documents, title deeds and other documents to demonstrate his title over his property. The petitioner has also filed the village map and also the google map to demonstrate that there existed a cart track between Survey Nos.457/E and 24.

3. Respondent No.5, Tahsildar, has filed a counter affidavit confirming that as per the village map, there is a pathway shown in between Survey Nos.45

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top