Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
G. Krsihna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
C. Suryakantham – Respondent
ORDER:
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J.
Since the issue involved in these Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the same Original Suit No.11 of 2015, between the same parties, they are being heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.
2. The C.R.P.Nos.559, 575 and 590 of 2018 are filed against the Orders dated 03.11.2017 in I.A.Nos.68, 80 and 57 of 2015 respectively in O.S.No.11 of 2015 passed by the learned V Additional District Judge (FTC), Warangal at Jangaon.
3. Heard Mr.R.K.Chitta, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs. Inspite of service of notice none appeared for the respondents, as such respondents are set ex-parte. Perused the record.
4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners herein filed O.S.No.11 of 2015 on the file of V Additional District Judge (FTC), Warangal at Jangaon, seeking recovery of possession of the suit property. It is stated that I.A.No.68 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent No.20, I.A.No.80 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent Nos.23 to 27 and I.A.No.57 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent Nos.20 to 23 respectively in O.S.No.11 of 2015 to avoid multiplicity of litigation and not to create th
Purchasers of the suit property pendente lite are necessary parties and must be impleaded for just adjudication, affirming the principle to prevent multiplicity of litigation.
Impleadment of a third party must be necessary for effective and complete adjudication of the suit issues, and should not enlarge the scope of the suit or divert the issue from biparti to tri party.
The court emphasized that necessary parties must be included in a suit to ensure complete adjudication, correcting the trial court's error in dismissing the petitioner's application for impleadment.
Implead of party - Suit for permanent injunction against the Government and when admittedly the property belongs to the Government the presence of the petitioner who claims to have purchased the said....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
