SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Telangana) 25

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
Kottala Ashok – Appellant
Versus
Maisa Bheemavva @ Bheema Bhai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : C.HARI PREETH
For the Respondent: A. JAGAN

ORDER :

Renuka Yara, J.

Heard M/s. C. Hari Preeth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A. Jagan, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Perused the entire record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioner/respondent No.2/defendant No.2 aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Nirmal (‘trial Court’) in I.A.No.277 of 2023 in O.S.No.86 of 2021, dated 04.01.2024, wherein a petition filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Section 151 of CPC seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to demarcate the entire land in Sy.No.147/2 situated at Koutla (K) Shivar Village of Nirmal Rural and Mandal and to fix the boundaries and measure the suit land as per registered sale deed and also demarcate Ac.0-08 guntas of land in said survey number by fixing boundaries, has been allowed appointing an Advocate Commissioner to fix the boundaries as per registered sale deeds of both the parties with respect to their land in Sy.No.147 of Koutla (K) Shivar Village of Nirmal Rural and Mandal.

3. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No.1 herein is plaintiff and she filed a suit against the petitioner herein and respondent No.2 herein seeki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top