Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M.MOHIUDDIN
G.Srinu @ Sreenivasulu @ Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accidental death of the deceased while travelling. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding negligence and liability. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. assessment of evidence supporting the deceased's status as a bona fide passenger. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. clarification of the application of strict liability under section 124-a. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. procedural lapses do not negate the substantive claims or evidence. (Para 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. discussion on liability and compensation under the railways act. (Para 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. conclusion and order directing compensation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J.
The present appeal is filed by the appellants/applicants being aggrieved by the judgment dated 02.01.2019 passed in O.A.II(U).No.442 of 2014, on the file of Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench, Secunderabad (hereinafter referred as ‘the Tribunal’) whereunder, the application filed by the appellants under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 seeking compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- with interest from the Respondent-Railways, was dismissed by the Tribunal.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred as they were arraye
The court established that a bona fide passenger is entitled to compensation under the Railways Act for an accidental death classified as an 'untoward incident', affirming strict liability principles....
Mere absence of ticket does not negate bonafide passenger status; affidavit suffices to discharge burden. Falling from running train is untoward incident under no-fault liability, entitling dependent....
The absence of a journey ticket does not negate a claim for compensation under the Railways Act; once prima facie evidence of being a bona fide passenger is established, the burden shifts to the Rail....
Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 imposes strict liability on Railways for deaths from untoward incidents, with no requirement for proving negligence or production of a ticket to establish bona ....
Passengers can establish bona fide status without a ticket if oral and circumstantial evidence supports travel claims; accidental falls from trains qualify as untoward incidents under the Railways Ac....
The absence of a ticket does not negate the presumption of a passenger's status, and the Railway is liable for compensation under section 124-A for untoward incidents.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for the death of a bona fide passenger resulting from an untoward incident, irrespective of negligence, provided the incident falls within ....
The court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident constituted an ‘untoward incident’ under the Railways Act, thus entitling the claimants to compensation.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for deaths from untoward incidents unless exceptions under Section 124A apply; negligence is irrelevant to claim validity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
