SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1851

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Sameel Deen – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Jagan Nath ,Respondent Advocate: AG

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 21.3.2024 and order of sentence dated 27.3.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., (learned Trial Court), vide which the appellant (accused before learned Trial Court) was convicted of the commission of an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years, pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for one year. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan against the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307, 324 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It was asserted that the informant/victim Rani Begum (PW1) is the wife of the accused. Three children were born to her. They were married and settled. The informant and accused were residing together in the house. She was watc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top