SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Sri Ramakrishna Sarada School Of Nursing Sri Ramakrishna Ashrama Charitable Hospital – Appellant 
Versus 
State Of Kerala Represented By The Principal Secretary To The Government – Respondent 
WA NO. 66 OF 2026
Decided on : 27-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADVS. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM SR. COUNSEL SRI.K.SHAJ SMT.BEENA N.KARTHA
SRI.ARUN CHAND SHRI.BHARAT VIJAY P. SHRI.KEVIN JAMES SHRI.AKASH JOSHI SMT.MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON SMT.GOPIKA GOPAL SMT.ARCHANA P.P. SHRI.REN SHIBU SMT.SHEHROON PATEL A.K.
SHRI.ISSAC MELVIN B.O. SHRI.ALVIN JOSEPH
For the Respondent: SMT. NISHA BOSE, SR. GP SRI. S. GANESH, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH
SCIENCES (KUHS) SRI. VIVEK MENON, SC, KERALA NURSES AND MIDWIVES COUNCIL DR. ABRAHAM P. MEACHINKARA, SC, SMT. SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN, SC,

Institutions upgraded from General Nursing and Midwifery (GNM) courses to B.Sc. Nursing cannot simultaneously operate GNM courses due to regulatory compliance requirements.

Headnote:(A) Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Section 5(i) - Indian Nursing Act, 1947 - Writ appeal challenging the dismissal of a petition for starting a GNM course after having shifted to B.Sc. Nursing. The Indian Nursing Council issued directives for phasing out GNM, later reversed, but applicant was rejected due to existing regulations. (Paras 3, 5, 10, 12, 14)

(B) Regulatory Compliance - Institutions upgraded from GNM to B.Sc. Nursing cannot re-establish GNM courses under current guidelines; compliance mandatory for new course inception. (Paras 6, 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appellant has been offering a GNM course but sought to start anew after being upgraded to B.Sc. Nursing, conflicting with existing regulations barring GNM readmission.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge dismissed the petition noting reliance upon statutory conditions and non-violation of GNM closure regulations.

Issues: The key concern was whether institutions upgraded to B.Sc. Nursing can start GNM courses thereafter.

Ratio Decidendi: Institutional transformation under regulatory approval restricts simultaneous GNM course offerings; non-compliance with conditions laid out in NOC was pivotal for dismissal.

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ appeal challenging previous judgment. (Para 1)
2. factual background of nursing course approvals. (Para 2)
3. appellant's contentions against denial of suitability certificate. (Para 3)
4. arguments regarding upgrading nursing courses and regulations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. writ appeal dismissed, affirming initial judgment. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

Muralee Krishna S., J.

1. The petitioner in W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025 filed this writ appeal under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 17.12.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025 and W.P.(C)No.40066 of 2025 filed by another college of nursing were dismissed.

2. Going by the averments in W.P.(C)No.33806 of 2025, the appellant has been offering the General Nursing and Midwifery (‘GNM’ for short) Course for several years. On 28.02.2019, the 3rd respondent, Indian Nursing Council (‘INC’ for short), issued Ext.P1 notification in tune with the National Health Policy, 2017, that there should be a single entry level for nursing, resolving that the existing GNM Course shall be phased out by the year 2020-2021 and shall be converted into College of Nursing. The said notification was issued to ensure the quality of nursing education; the implementation framework seeks to merge GNM schools with B.Sc. Nursing and have a single entry-level qualification as B.Sc. Nursing for nurses by redesigning the B.Sc. curriculum as practical based and by phasing away the GNM course. By Ext.P3 letter dated 19.09.2019, the 3rd respondent requested the State Government/State Nursing Council to ensure that no new GNM School of Nursing shall be approved from the academic year 2019- 20 and no inspection of GNM School of Nursing shall be conducted for the purpose of renewal/restart/enhancement of seats etc. The appellant then sent a letter dated 02.12.2019 to the 3rd respondent requesting reconsideration of discontinuing GNM course, as the course helps many poor girl candidates studying under the appellant institution to lead a good life. To that request, the 3rd respondent sent Ext.P4 reply dated 24.12.2019 stating that the decision to discontinue the GNM course is final and that offering B.Sc. Nursing is the only alternative as it is part of the National Health Policy. In the meantime, in the year 2020, the entire country underwent the COVID-19 pandemic, and there was a shortfall of medical professionals and nurses. Therefore, the National Health Policy underwent severe changes, and the decision to discontinue the GNM course was rolled back, and the permissions were granted by all States to start GNM courses.

2.1 The appellant further pleads that the parent hospital of the appellant filed Ext.P5 application dated 20.07.2024 before the 1st respondent, State of Kerala, seeking No Objection Certificate (NOC) to commence a GNM course. Thereafter, the 1st respondent conducted necessary inspections in the appellant institution and, upon being satisfied with the infrastructure and manpower, by Ext.P6 order dated 16.10.2014 granted No Objection Certificate to commence the GNM course with an intake of 40 seats. Ext.P6 NOC stipulates several conditions, the first among them is that the appellant institution shall have the standards, which are prescribed by the 3rd respondent INC as per their Regulations published from time to time. The second condition is that the appellant shall comply with the guidelines, orders and regulations which are issued by the 1st respondent, State of Kerala and the 2nd respondent, the Kerala Nurses and Midwives Council, from time to time. The third condition is that the appellant shall obtain an approval from the 2nd respondent and suitability certificate from the 3rd respondent, and a letter of permission from the 1st respondent before admitting students.

2.2 The appellant states that after receiving Ext.P6 NOC, the appellant submitted Ext.P7 application dated 17.10.2024 before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top