Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
K.V Sabu – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Joint Director, Central Range) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge regarding supersession order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument on the requirement of consultation before supersession. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. definition and function of a financing bank. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. consultation requirement and its implications. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. the democratic nature of circle co-operative union. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. safeguards against arbitrary supersession. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. procedural violations leading to the annulment of supersession. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. judgment restoring managing committee, procedural focus. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
2. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Fisheries Department (Ernakulam) (respondent No.1) issued an order under Section 66 of the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act (for short “the Act”) directing an inspection into the functioning of the Society. The office bearers of the Society cooperated with the inspection and participated in the inquiry.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that before issuing an order superseding the Managing Committee of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
