Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR
Banumathy – Appellant
Versus
R.Lakshmi Kutty (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition lawsuit details and relationships among parties. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. disputed legitimacy of plaintiffs based on marriage status. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. implications of void marriage on inheritance rights. (Para 14 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. final ruling on the share distribution of plaintiffs. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
S. Sounthar, J.
The unsuccessful defendants 7 and 9 are the appellants herein.
2. The 1st respondent, his deceased mother-R.Lakshmi Kutty and respondents 2 and 3 have filed a suit for partition against the appellants and other respondents. Pending suit, R.Lakshmi Kutty died and the respondents 1 to 3 were recorded as her legal representatives. The suit was decreed by the Trial Court by granting 10/36 share in favour of the 1st respondent/2nd plaintiff, 1/36 share in favour of 3rd respondent. The suit was dismissed in respect of 2nd respondent. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the appellants have come before this Court.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the suit.
4. As per the plaint averment, the deceased 1st plaintiff-R.Lakshmi Kutty was the second wife of deceased 1st defendant-Narayanan Nambiar.
Children born to a void marriage are entitled to property shares under the Hindu Marriage Act, despite the marriage's invalidity.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a child born out of a void marriage is not entitled to claim partition of the joint family properties during the lifetime of the parent but ma....
Daughters have equal rights as coparceners in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, affecting share distribution in partition cases.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Registered partition deeds take precedence over claims of oral partition, limiting the rights of heirs under the amended Hindu Succession Act to those alive or affected at the time of partition.
Daughters have equal rights and shares in ancestral joint family properties under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
