Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R.SAKTHIVEL, JJ
T.K.Karupannasamy – Appellant
Versus
Masilamani (died) by LRs. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of joint family business and property disputes. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' claim on the properties and denial of joint family ownership. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments and positions from appellants regarding the validity of claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 4. analysis of evidence surrounding property ownership. (Para 12 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. scrutiny of the wills and evidence of mental capacity of signatories. (Para 27 , 30 , 32) |
| 6. conclusions on the validity of wills and execution of documents. (Para 36 , 38) |
| 7. final decree regarding share allocations and dismissal of appeals. (Para 41 , 42) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.952 of 2004 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore has filed A.S.No.656 of 2016 against the rejection of reliefs in respect of item nos.10 and 11 of the suit schedule properties and also for rendition of accounts. The 10th defendant before the trial court has filed A.S.No.638 of 2016 seeking to set aside the preliminary decree granted to the plaintiffs. Defendants 1, 2, 8, 9, 12 to 14 have also filed an appeal in A.S.No.675 of 2016 challenging the judgment and decree of the tri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
