Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, K.Govindarajan Thilakavadi, JJ
P.Thanigaimalai – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar Central Administrative Tribunal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common orders and procedural matters. (Para 1) |
| 2. basis on which the petitioners sought financial upgradation. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. contentions and denials regarding petitions' eligibility. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondent's stance and relevant laws on qualification. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's evaluation of the tribunal's decision. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 11 , 12) |
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.)
1.1. WMP No.26994 of 2023 seeking to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition, stands ordered on payment of separate Court fee.
1.2. WMP No.33763 of 2025 seeking to dispense with the production of certified copy of the order in O.A.No.310/01736 of 2016 dated 03.01.2023 issued by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, stands ordered.
2. The petitioners in both these writ petitions have sought for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the order passed in O.A.No.1726 of 2016 dated 03.01.2023 as illegal, incompetent and contrary to law with a consequential direction to the respondents to grant the petitioners with the 2nd
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
