Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
RONIZA AB RASHID – Appellant
Versus
MR DIY (KUCHAI) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. claimant's arguments for document production (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's observations on claimant's inquiry (Para 11 , 18) |
| 4. company's objections to the application (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's reasoning and decision on the application (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. ratio decidendi regarding document relevance (Para 29) |
[1] This is a reference from the Director General for Industrial Relations to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 [Act 177] in respect of the dismissal of RONIZA BINTI AB RASHID ("the Claimant") by MR DIY (KUCHAI) SDN BHD ("the Company") on 3 September 2021.
[2] On 25 May 2023, the Claimant filed a Notice of Application ("the Claimant's Application") ["Enclosure 27a"] for an Order under r 21B of the Industrial Court Rules 1967 as regards the following:
(a) the Company to produce and serve a copy of the following documents:
(i) the Company's Code of Conduct;
(ii) the Company's Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy;
(iii) the Company's Gifts and Entertainment Policy;
(iv) the Company's Retail Management Depar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
