Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
MUHAMMAD EIZAT HAZMI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges and factual background of the accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. court's findings and sentencing. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. prosecution's case and evidence presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. defendant's arguments against conviction. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. legal principles regarding dangerous driving. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. court's evaluation of evidence and testimonies. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 7. final conclusion and affirmation of conviction. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
Introduction
[1] The Appellant/Accused was charged under the provisions of s 41(1) of the Road Transport Act of 1987 ( RTA ), owing to the tragic occurrence of an accident that resulted in the loss of nine lives. These charges were registered under (3) different case numbers and were tried together before a Magistrate. After an exhaustive trial involving 21 witnesses, which included after the defence being called, the learned Magistrate, having carefully considered the evidence, found the Appellant guilty of the alleged offense of caus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
