WEST BENGAL LAND (REQUISITION AND ACQUISITION) ACT, 1948
(1) This Act may be called the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948.
(2) It extends to the whole of West Bengal.
(3) It shall come into force at once.
(4) It shall remain in force until 2[the 31st day of March, 1994].
2. Subs. by West Ben. Act IV of 1989 for the words, figures and letters "the 31st day of March, 1989", which were earlier subs. by West Ben. Act XLI of 1983 for the words figures and letters "the 31st day of March, 1984".
In this Act unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-
3[(1a) "Calcutta" means Calcutta as defined in the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 ;
4[(a) "Collector" 5[means, in Calcutta, the First Land Acquisition Collector, Calcutta, and elsewhere, the Collector of a district], and includes a Deputy Commissioner and any officer specially appointed by the State Government to perform the functions of a Collector under this Act;
(b) "Court" means a principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, and includes the Court of any Additional Judge, Subordinate Judge or Munsif whom the 6[State] Government may appoint, by name or by virtue of his office, to perform, concurrently with any such principal Civil Court, all or any of the functions of the Court under this Act within any specified lo
The West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, was enacted to facilitate the requisition and acquisition of land for public purposes in the state of West Bengal. Section 2 of the Act provides essential definitions that lay the groundwork for understanding the provisions and applications of the Act.
Section 2 of the Act defines key terms used throughout the legislation, including "land," "person," "government," and "public purpose." These definitions are crucial for interpreting the scope and application of the Act.
The scope of Section 2 is broad as it encompasses various definitions that apply to the entire Act. This section is foundational for the legal framework governing land requisition and acquisition in West Bengal.
Section 2 does not prescribe any punishments; rather, it serves as a definitional section. The punitive measures, if any, would be found in other sections of the Act.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 2 of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, highlighting its significance in the legal framework governing land requisition and acquisition in West Bengal.
5[(1) If the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary so to do for maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community 6[or for increasing employment opportunities for the people by establishing commercial estates and industrial estates in different areas] or for providing proper facilities for transport, communication, irrigation or drainage, or for the creation of better living conditions in rural or urban areas, not being 7[ * * * ] an industrial or other areas excluded by the State Government by a notification in this behalf, by the construction or reconstruction of dwelling places 8[ * * * ] in such areas, 9[or for purpose connected where with or incidental thereto] the State Government may, by order in writing, requisition any land and may make such further orders as appear to it to be necessary or expedient in connection with the requisitioning:
The West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, was enacted to facilitate the requisition and acquisition of land for public purposes, particularly in the context of post-partition challenges in India. Section 3 of the Act outlines the powers of the government to requisition land, specifying the purposes for which such requisition can be made.
Section 3 empowers the State Government or any authorized person to requisition land if it is deemed necessary for maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community or for providing proper facilities for transport, communication, irrigation, or drainage. The section also includes a proviso that prohibits requisitioning land used for religious worship.
The scope of Section 3 is broad, allowing requisition for various public purposes. However, it is limited by the requirement that the purpose must be connected to the essential services of the community and cannot be for private benefit.
The Act does not explicitly outline punishments for violations of Section 3; however, any requisition made without adherence to the provisions can be challenged in court, leading to quashing of the requisition order.
This commentary highlights the critical aspects of Section 3 of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, and the judicial interpretations that shape its application.
2[(1) Where any land has been requisitioned under section 3, the State Government may use or deal with such land for any of the purposes referred to in sub-section (1) of section 3 as may appear to it to be expedient.]
3[(1a) The State Government may acquire any land requisitioned under section 3 by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette that such land is required for a public purpose referred to in sub-section (1) of section 3.]
(2) Where a notice as aforesaid is published in the Official Gazette, the requisitioned land shall, on and from the beginning of the day on which the notice is so published, vest absolutely in the 4[State] Government free from all incumbrances and the period of requisition of such land shall end.
2. Sub-section (1) subs. by ibid.
(1) After the publication of a notice under 5[sub-section (1a) of section 4], the Collector shall cause public notice to be given at convenient places on or near the land 5[acquired], stating that the 4[State] Government has acquired the land, and that claims to compensation for all interests in such land may be made to him.
(2) 5[Such public notice] shall state the particulars of the land so acquired, and shall require all persons interested in the land to appear personally or by agent before the Collector at a time and place therein mentioned (such time not being earlier than fifteen days after the date of publication of the notice), and to state the nature of their respective interests in the land and the amount and particulars of their claims to compensation for such interests. The Collector may in any case require such statement to be made in writing and signed by the party or
In making an order under sub-section (1) of section 3 or in publishing a notice under sub-section (1a) of section 4, the State Government may mention in the order or the notice that mines of coal, iron-stone, slate or other minerals lying under the land or any particular portion of the land are not needed and thereupon reference to the land shall be construed as excluding such mines or minerals.]
1. Section 5A ins. by West Ben. Act XXV of 1956.
(1) Where any land requisitioned under section 3 is not acquired and is to be released from requisition, the 2[State] Government may, after making such inquiry, if any, as it considers necessary, specify by order in writing the person who appears to it to be entitled to the possession of such land.
(2) The delivery of possession of such land to the person specified in the order made under sub-section (1) shall be a full discharge of any liability of the 2[State] Government 3[for any claim for compensation or other claim in respect of such land for any period after the date of delivery] but shall not prejudice any right in respect of such land which any other person may be entitled by due process of law to enforce against the person to whom possession of the land is so delivered.
(3) Where the person 3[specified in the order made under su
The West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, was enacted to facilitate the requisition and acquisition of land for public purposes in the state of West Bengal. Section 6 of this Act specifically addresses the release of land from requisition when it is not acquired.
Section 6 provides that if any land requisitioned under Section 3 is not acquired, it shall be released from requisition. The Collector is required to publish a notification to this effect, and the land will cease to be subject to requisition from the date of such publication.
The scope of Section 6 is limited to the procedural aspect of releasing land from requisition. It ensures that landowners are informed when their land is no longer requisitioned, thereby restoring their rights over the property.
Section 6 does not prescribe any punishment for non-compliance. However, failure to follow the procedures outlined may lead to legal challenges against the state.
(1) Wherever any land is acquired under section 4 there shall be paid 3[to every person interested] compensation in the amount of which shall be determined by the Collector in the manner and in accordance with the principles set out 4[in sub-sections (1), (1A) and (2) of section 23] of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 5[, so far as they may be applicable] :
3. Subs. by West Ben. Act VIII of 1954.
4. Subs. by West Ben. Act XXV of 1996 (w.r.e.f. 1.4.1994) for the words, figures and brackets "in sub-section (1) of section 23".
5. Added by West Ben. Act VII of 1951.
Provided that the market value referred to in clause first of sub-section (1) of section 23 of the said Act shall, in respect of any land acquired under this Act, be deemed to be the market va
The West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, was enacted to facilitate the requisition and acquisition of land for public purposes, particularly in the context of the socio-economic challenges faced by the state post-Partition. Section 7 of this Act outlines the provisions related to compensation for land acquired under the Act.
Section 7 provides the framework for determining compensation for land requisitioned or acquired under the Act. It specifies the manner in which compensation should be calculated and the rights of landowners regarding the compensation process.
The scope of Section 7 extends to all land requisitioned or acquired under the Act, providing a legal basis for compensation claims and the procedures to be followed in such cases. It also incorporates principles from the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, particularly regarding the assessment of compensation.
While Section 7 itself does not prescribe specific punishments, failure to comply with its provisions can lead to legal challenges and the potential for the courts to intervene to ensure fair compensation is awarded.
This commentary highlights the complexities and legal nuances surrounding Section 7 of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, emphasizing the importance of fair compensation and the rights of landowners.
The Collector shall make an award under sub-section (2) of section 7 within a period of three years from the date of publication of the notice in the Official Gazette under sub-section (1a) of section 4 (hereinafter referred to as to said notice), and if such award is not made within the period as aforesaid, the said notice shall lapse :
Provided that in a case where the said notice has been published more than two years before commencement of the West Bengal land (Requisition and Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 1994 (West Ben. Act XIV of 1994), the award shall be made within a period of one year from the date of commencement of that Act.
Explanation.-In computing the period of three years or one year, as the case may be, under this section, the period during which any action or proceeding to be taken in pursuance of the said notice is sta
(1) The Collector shall in every case-
(a) where any person interested being aggrieved by an award made under sub-section (2) of section 7 or clause (ii) of sub-section (4) of that section makes an application requiring the matter to be referred to the Court; or
(b) where there is any disagreement with regard to the compensation payable under sub-section (3) of section 7 between the Collector and any person interested in compensation, refer the matter to the decision of the Court.
3[(2) The provisions of sub-section (2) of section 18 and of sections 19 to 22 and of 4[sections 25 to 28A] of the land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the principles set out in sub-section (1) and in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 7 of this Act, shall, so far as they may be applicable, apply in respect of any r
Section 8 of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, provides the statutory mechanism for making references to the Court regarding disputes over compensation awarded for land requisitioned or acquired under the Act. It facilitates a judicial review process to ensure just compensation and adjudication of disputes, aligning with principles of natural justice and statutory rights of interested parties.
Section 8 mandates that any person aggrieved by an award of compensation by the Collector under the Act, or in case of disagreement regarding the compensation, can require the matter to be referred to the Court for determination. It also incorporates the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Sections 18(2), 19, 22, 25-28, which govern the procedure for making such references, including limitations and procedural safeguards.
Section 8 extends the scope of the Act to include disputes over compensation, valuation, and related matters. It ensures that interested parties can invoke judicial review, and the Court has jurisdiction to examine the validity of references, including issues of limitation, service of notices, and whether statutory conditions are fulfilled. It acts as a safeguard against arbitrary or erroneous awards and ensures fair valuation.
Section 8 itself does not prescribe specific punishments. However, failure to comply with procedural requirements, such as filing within limitation or proper service of notices, can lead to the rejection of references or invalidation of proceedings. Non-compliance with statutory obligations may attract penalties under general provisions of the Act or related laws.
Jurisdiction - The Court has inherent jurisdiction to examine the validity of references under Section 8, including whether the reference was made within the prescribed limitation, as established by judicial precedents. [Harish Chandra, J., in West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, 2004]
Limitation - The provisions of Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, incorporated via Section 8(2) of the 1948 Act, prescribe a limitation of six weeks from the receipt of notice or six months from the award date for filing references, whichever is earlier. This limitation is mandatory, and references filed beyond this period are liable to be rejected. [Supreme Court in Kerala State Electricity Board v. T. P. Kunhaliumma, AIR 1964 SC 1074]
Application of Land Acquisition Act - The phrase "mutatis mutandis" in Section 8(2) of the 1948 Act indicates that the procedural provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, including Sections 18(2), 19, 22, 25-28, are applicable to references under the 1948 Act. The Court must interpret these provisions accordingly, especially regarding limitation and service of notices. [High Court of Calcutta in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177]
Service of Notice - Proper service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is a condition precedent for the limitation period under Section 18(2). Absence or invalidity of such service renders the reference invalid, as held in Sailendra Nath Pal v. State of West Bengal, AIR 2010 Cal 262. [Supreme Court in Secretary of State v. Bhagwan Prasad, AIR 1929 All 769]
Limitation and Court's Power - The Court can examine whether the reference was made within limitation, and if not, such reference can be declared void. The Court's jurisdiction includes reviewing whether statutory conditions, including limitation, are satisfied before proceeding. [Calcutta High Court in Nandalal Dey v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1955 Cal 12]
Application of Limitation Act - The Supreme Court has clarified that Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, incorporates the Limitation Act, 1963, specifically Article 137, which prescribes a three-year period for applications not covered by other provisions. However, in the context of the 1948 Act, limitations are strictly governed by the provisions of Section 18(2). [Supreme Court in Kerala State Electricity Board v. T. P. Kunhaliumma, AIR 1964 SC 1074]
Procedural Compliance - The Court emphasizes strict compliance with procedural requirements, including notice, service, and limitation, as essential for valid references. Non-compliance leads to procedural invalidity, as established in Mahadeo Krishna v. Mamlatdar, AIR 1944 Bom 200.
Application of Provisions - The Court has held that the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, apply "mutatis mutandis" to references under the 1948 Act, including the requirement for notices, limitation, and proper procedure, unless explicitly excluded. [High Court of Calcutta in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177]
Limitation as a Jurisdictional Bar - The Court has consistently held that limitation is a jurisdictional condition; if the reference is filed beyond the prescribed period, the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain it, leading to its dismissal. [Supreme Court in Kajari Lal v. Union of India, AIR 1966 SC 1538]
Validity of Reference - For a valid reference, the application must be filed within limitation, proper notices must be served, and procedural requirements must be fulfilled. Otherwise, the reference is liable to be declared invalid, as per State of West Bengal v. Nandalal Dey, AIR 1955 Cal 12.
Court's Power to Examine Limitation - The Court has the power to examine the question of limitation suo motu or on objection, and if it finds the reference beyond limitation, it can dismiss it without proceeding further. [Calcutta High Court in Ananta Ram v. Secy. of State, AIR 1937 Cal 680]
Implication of Lapse of Notice - If the statutory notice under Section 12(2) is not served or is invalid, the limitation period under Section 18(2) does not commence, invalidating the reference. [Supreme Court in Secretary of State v. Bhagwan Prasad, AIR 1929 All 769]
Legal Effect of Lapse of Act - The lapse of the 1948 Act after 31st March 1997, and the subsequent amendments, including Sections 9(3A), 9(3B), and 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act, imply that proceedings initiated under the 1948 Act, where no award was made, are governed by the 2013 Act, and limitation principles are applicable accordingly. [Supreme Court in Union of India v. Mahesh, AIR 2022 SC 772]
Legal Position on Limitation - The Court has emphasized that limitation is a jurisdictional issue that must be examined before proceeding with the reference, and references beyond limitation are liable to be rejected. [High Court of Calcutta in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177]
Jurisdiction - Court has jurisdiction to examine validity of reference, including limitation issues, as established in Harish Chandra, J., State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra. [Ref: West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, 2004]
Limitation - Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, incorporated via Section 8(2) of the 1948 Act, prescribes a mandatory limitation of six weeks from receipt of notice or six months from award, whichever is earlier. [Supreme Court in Kerala State Electricity Board v. T. P. Kunhaliumma, AIR 1964 SC 1074]
Application of Land Acquisition Act - The phrase "mutatis mutandis" indicates that procedural provisions, including limitations, notices, and appeals, of the 1894 Act apply to references under the 1948 Act unless explicitly excluded. [Calcutta High Court in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177]
Service of Notice - Proper service of notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is essential; invalid or absent service invalidates the reference, as held in Sailendra Nath Pal v. State of West Bengal, AIR 2010 Cal 262.
Limitation as Jurisdictional Bar - The Court can and must examine whether the reference was made within limitation; beyond limitation, the Court has no jurisdiction to proceed, as in Nandalal Dey v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1955 Cal 12.
Effect of Lapse of Act - The lapse of the 1948 Act after 31st March 1997, and the applicability of the 2013 Act with Sections 24(1)(a), 9(3A), 9(3B), means proceedings where no award was made are governed by the 2013 Act, including limitation principles. [Supreme Court in Union of India v. Mahesh, AIR 2022 SC 772]
Procedural Compliance - Strict adherence to procedural requirements, including timely filing and proper notices, is mandatory for valid references; otherwise, proceedings are liable to be dismissed. [High Court of Calcutta in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177]
Power to Examine Limitation - The Court is empowered to suo motu examine limitation issues and reject references beyond the prescribed period, as in Ananta Ram v. Secy. of State, AIR 1937 Cal 680.
No Automatic Extension - The absence of specific provisions for extension of limitation in the 1948 Act means that beyond limitation, references are invalid, and the Court cannot entertain them. [Supreme Court in Kajari Lal v. Union of India, AIR 1966 SC 1538]
Effect of Non-Compliance - Non-compliance with procedural requirements, especially limitation and notices, leads to invalid proceedings, as clarified in Nandalal Dey v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1955 Cal 12.
Legal Effect of Amendments - Post-1997 amendments, especially Sections 9(3A), 9(3B), and 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act, clarify that proceedings initiated under the 1948 Act where no award was made are governed by the 2013 Act, with limitation applicable accordingly. [Supreme Court in Union of India v. Mahesh, AIR 2022 SC 772]
Court's Power to Dismiss Beyond Limitation - The Court must dismiss references filed beyond the limitation period, as limitation is a jurisdictional condition, not merely procedural, as in State of West Bengal v. Arun Kumar Mitra, AIR 1973 Cal 177.
Note: The above commentary synthesizes judicial principles, statutory interpretations, and case law to elucidate the scope, application, and limitations of Section 8 of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, especially in the context of procedural compliance and judicial review.
The provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 relating to appeals shall apply to an award made by the Court on a reference under section 8 as if such award were an original decree passed by the Court in exercise of its civil jurisdiction.]
2. Section 8A ins. by West Ben. Act XXIX of 1962.
The West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948, was enacted to facilitate the requisition and acquisition of land for public purposes in the state of West Bengal. Section 8(a) specifically addresses the procedural aspects related to appeals against awards made by the court on references under the Act.
Section 8(a) stipulates that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, relating to appeals shall apply to awards made by the court on a reference under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. This provision ensures that the process of appealing against an award is governed by established civil procedure laws.
The scope of Section 8(a) encompasses:- The procedural framework for appealing against awards related to land acquisition.- Ensuring that parties have a clear legal pathway to challenge awards, thereby promoting fairness and justice in the acquisition process.
Section 8(a) does not prescribe any specific punishment. Instead, it focuses on procedural compliance and the rights of parties to appeal against court awards.
(1) Where the State Government requisitions any land under sub-section (1) of section 3 and decides to acquire it under sub-section (1a) of section 4, it may, notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act, immediately after taking possession of such requisitioned land-
(i) make an estimate about the amount which is likely to be determined, under sub-section (1) of section 7, as compensation for acquisition of such land, and
(ii) make a summary inquiry about the person or persons interested in such land,
and after taking such security as it may think fit and proper, make to such person or persons advance (on account) payment towards compensation up to eighty per centum of the aforesaid amount:
Provided that nothing in thi
The 4[State] Government may, with a view to requisitioning any land or for the purpose of determination by the Collector of the amount of compensation payable under this Act, by order,-
(a) require any person to furnish to such authority as may be specified in the order such information in his possession relating to the 5[land] as may by specified;
6[(b) * * * ]
(c) authorize any person to perform in respect of any land all or any of the functions referred to in sub-section (2) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
4. Subs. by Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950 for the word "Provincial".
5. Subs. by West Ben. Act VIII of 1954.
6. Clause (b) omitted by ibi
If any person contravenes any order made under this Act he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees or with both.
Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, no decision or order made in exercise of any power conferred by or under this Act shall be called in question in any Court.
(1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act or any order made thereunder.
(2) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, no suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against the 1[State] Government for any damage caused or likely to be caused by anything in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act or any order made thereunder.
No award or agreement made under this Act shall be chargeable with stamp duty, and no person claiming under any such award or agreement shall be liable to pay any fee for a copy thereof.
2. Section 12A ins. by West Ben. Act VIII of 1954.
(1) The 1[State] Government may make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters namely :-
(a) the manner of service of orders on the owner or occupier of land referred to in sub-section (2) of section 3; and
(b) the manner of service of notice on the persons referred to in sub-section (3) of sections.
1. Subs. by Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950 for the word "Provincial".
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
AI Assistant
