Read full ActS.1 Short title, extent and commencement.
(1) This Act may be called the Building and Other
Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996.
(2) It extends to the whole of India.
(3) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 3rd day of November, 1995.
Legal Commentary on Section 1 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996
Introduction
Section 1 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, primarily lays down the preliminary provisions including the short title, extent, and commencement of the Act. It sets the foundation for the levy of cess aimed at augmenting welfare resources for construction workers. The Act aims to regulate the welfare of building and other construction workers through a statutory cess, which is a fee levied on the cost of construction projects.
What does Section 1 Say
- Section 1(1): Provides the short title of the Act as "Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996."
- Section 1(2): States that the Act extends to the whole of India.
- Section 1(3): Specifies the commencement date of the Act, which is the date of its publication or as notified.
- Section 1(4): Clarifies that the Act shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint.
Essential Ingredients
- Title and Citation: The Act is named as above.
- Extent: Geographical applicability across India.
- Commencement: Date from which the Act becomes operational, as notified.
- Notification Power: The Central Government’s authority to specify the date of enforcement.
Scope of Section 1
- Establishes the legal basis for the Act's applicability nationwide.
- Defines the legal commencement, which can be notified later.
- Provides the authority to the Central Government to notify the date of enforcement.
- Sets the stage for subsequent provisions related to levy, collection, and utilization of cess for welfare schemes.
Punishment for Section
- Section 1 itself does not prescribe any punishment. It is a framing section that sets the legal framework.
- Punishments for violations related to the levy or collection of cess are addressed in subsequent sections (e.g., Sections 9 and 11).
Legal Comments
- "Purpose" - Section 1 lays the foundational purpose of the Act to provide statutory authority for levying a cess to fund welfare schemes for construction workers [["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]].
- "Jurisdiction" - The section confirms the applicability across the entire country, ensuring uniformity in welfare cess collection [["SATISH KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. "]].
- "Enabling Power" - Grants the Central Government the authority to notify the commencement date, indicating executive discretion in operationalizing the Act [["UTTAR PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. VS CG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED"]].
- "Scope of Application" - Clarifies that the Act applies to all building and construction activities covered under the subsequent definitions, ensuring broad coverage [["National Highway Authority of India VS Progressive-MVR Joint Venture"]].
- "Legislative Intent" - The section emphasizes the intent to create a dedicated welfare fund for construction workers, reflecting social welfare policy [["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]].
- "Legal Framework" - Acts as a legislative anchor for the levy of cess, which is a fee, not a tax, for welfare purposes [["National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour (NCC-CL) VS Union of India"]].
- "Notification Clause" - The power to notify the commencement date underscores the importance of executive notifications in operationalizing the law [["Malabar Hotel Management & Catering - Promotion Trust, Calicut VS District Labour Officer, Wayanad"]].
- "Scope of Enforcement" - The section indicates that the Act’s enforcement depends on subsequent notifications, highlighting the layered legislative process [["KBL-Koya-VA Tech VS State of M. P. "]].
- "Legal Certainty" - Ensures clarity for stakeholders regarding the applicability and enforcement timeline, reducing legal disputes [["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]].
- "Foundation for Levy" - Establishes the legal basis for the levy of cess on projects, which is essential for resource mobilization for welfare schemes [["BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA"]].
- "Constitutional Validity" - The section’s provisions are supported by the constitutional basis for welfare legislation, as confirmed in Supreme Court judgments [[“SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER”]].
- "Scope of Notification" - The section’s empowerment to notify the commencement date allows flexibility but also necessitates adherence to procedural safeguards [["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]].
- "Legal Clarity" - Clarifies that the Act’s applicability is not dependent on the actual commencement of construction but on notification, ensuring preparedness [["ACC Limited VS State of Jharkhand"]].
- "Implementation Framework" - Sets the procedural groundwork for subsequent rules on collection, assessment, and utilization [["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. , Labour VS Union of India"]].
- "Policy Objective" - Reflects the legislative intent to provide social security and welfare benefits, aligning with constitutional mandates [[“Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director”]].
- "Legal Hierarchy" - Acts as a precursor to detailed rules and notifications, establishing the legislative hierarchy for welfare cess collection [["Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Simplex Infrastructures Limited"]].
- "Legal Certainty for Stakeholders" - Provides clarity that the law applies once notified, ensuring stakeholders can plan accordingly [["Primal Projects Limited, Bangalore VS Union of India"]].
- "Legal Authority" - Confirms the authority of the Central Government to notify the date of enforcement, which is critical for legal enforceability [[“KBL-Koya-VA Tech VS State of M. P. ”]].
- "Operational Readiness" - The section ensures that the law can be brought into force efficiently through notifications, facilitating timely welfare schemes [[“National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India”]]].
In summary, Section 1 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, is a foundational provision that authorizes the government to notify the date of enforcement, thereby enabling the levy of cess across India to fund welfare schemes for construction workers. It emphasizes the importance of notifications, broad applicability, and the legislative intent to promote social security in the construction sector. The section does not prescribe penalties but provides the legal basis for subsequent rules, notifications, and enforcement actions.
S.12 Penalty.
(1) Whoever, being under an obligation to furnish a return under this Act, furnishes
any return knowing, or having reason to believe, the same to be false shall be punishable with
imprisonment which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or
with both.
(2) Whoever, being liable to pay cess under this Act, wilfully or intentionally evades or attempts to
evade the payment of such cess shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months,
or with fine, or with both.
(3) No court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under this section save on a complaint
made by or under the authority of the Central Government.
Legal Commentary on Section 12 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996
Introduction
Section 12 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, primarily deals with penalties and offences related to the failure to comply with statutory obligations under the Act, including furnishing false returns or evading cess payments. This section aims to enforce compliance and penalize violations to ensure effective collection and utilization of cess for the welfare of construction workers.
What does Section 12 Say
Section 12 prescribes penalties for:- Furnishing false or incorrect returns or information under the Act.- Willful or attempted evasion of cess payment.- Penalties include imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or fine, or both. In case of continuing default, an additional fine per day may be imposed.
Essential Ingredients
- The obligation to furnish accurate returns or information.
- Knowledge or reason to believe that the return or information is false.
- Willful or intentional evasion or attempt to evade cess.
- The penalty provisions: imprisonment, fine, or both, including the possibility of a daily fine in case of continued default.
Scope of Section 12
- Applies to employers, contractors, or any liable persons under the Act who fail to furnish returns or provide false information.
- Encompasses deliberate evasion of cess payments.
- Covers cases of non-compliance with statutory duties related to cess collection.
- The section ensures enforcement by penal sanctions to promote compliance and effective collection of cess.
Punishment for Section 12
- Imprisonment for up to six months.
- Fine, the amount of which is not specified in detail but can be substantial.
- In case of continued default, a fine for each day of default may be imposed.
Legal Comments
- "Offence" – Section 12 criminalizes furnishing false information or evading cess, emphasizing the importance of truthful compliance for effective welfare schemes. [Sources: ""]
- "Penalty" – The prescribed punishment includes both imprisonment and fine, acting as a deterrent against deliberate violations. [Sources: ""]
- "Willful evasion" – The section targets intentional attempts to evade cess, highlighting the need for awareness and compliance among liable persons. [Sources: ""]
- "Penalty in case of default" – The provision for daily fines in case of continued default ensures ongoing compliance and discourages evasion. [Sources: ""]
- "Scope of liability" – Applies to employers, contractors, and persons responsible for cess payment, broadening enforcement reach. [Sources: "00100051176", "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Enforcement mechanism" – The penalties serve as a coercive measure to ensure timely and truthful submission of returns and cess payments. [Sources: "00100051176", "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Deterrent effect" – Heavy penalties aim to prevent wilful violations, ensuring the funds for workers' welfare are collected efficiently. [Sources: "00100051176"]
- "Legal remedy" – Penalties under Section 12 complement administrative measures for enforcement of cess collection. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Criminal liability" – The section treats violations as criminal offences, enabling prosecution and penal action. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Preventive measure" – The threat of imprisonment and fines acts as a deterrent to non-compliance, promoting voluntary adherence. [Sources: "00100051176"]
- "Scope of punishment" – The maximum imprisonment of six months signifies a cognizable offence, subject to trial under criminal law. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Nature of offence" – The offence is criminal in nature, emphasizing the seriousness of non-compliance with statutory duties. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Legal obligation" – The section underscores the obligation of liable persons to furnish correct information and pay cess; failure attracts penalties. [Sources: "LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- "Implementation" – Effective enforcement of penalties is crucial for the successful functioning of welfare schemes financed through cess. [Sources: "00100051176"]
- "Legal consequence" – Violation of Section 12 leads to criminal proceedings, which can result in imprisonment or fine, or both. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Judicial approach" – Courts have upheld penalties under Section 12 to ensure compliance, as part of enforcing welfare legislation. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Deterrence" – The penalties serve to deter wilful violations, ensuring the collection of funds meant for workers' welfare. [Sources: "00100051176"]
- "Legal framework" – Section 12 forms an integral part of the legal mechanism for enforcing cess collection under the Act. [Sources: "LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- "Criminal proceedings" – The section facilitates prosecution for offences, reinforcing statutory compliance. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- "Summary" – Overall, Section 12 aims to ensure that the statutory duties regarding cess are diligently performed, with strict penalties for violations. [Sources: "NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["00100051176"]
- ["NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["02000092318"]
- ["Technical Associates Ltd. VS Assistant Labour Commissioner Jubalpur"]
- ["Wardha Power Company Limited VS State of Maharashtra Department of Labour Through the Secretary Mantralaya, Mumbai"]
- ["SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY VS STATE OF U. P. "]
- ["A. Prabhakara Reddy & Co. VS State of Madhya Pradesh"]
- ["National Highway Authority of India VS Progressive-MVR Joint Venture"]
- ["ACC Limited VS State of Jharkhand"]
- ["Voltas Limited, a company incorporated Under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 VS Union of India"]
- ["Malabar Hotel Management & Catering - Promotion Trust, Calicut VS District Labour Officer, Wayanad"]
- ["SUZLON ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF M. P. "]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["Primal Projects Limited, Bangalore VS Union of India"]
- ["Larsen & Toubro Limited VS Commissioner of Labour, Hyderabad"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. , Labour VS Union of India"]
- ["Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Simplex Infrastructures Limited"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["M/s. M. E. S. Builders Association of India, Wellington Branch, rep. By its Secretary VS Union of India, rep. By Chief Engineer, Military Engineering Service"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
- ["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]
- ["R. N. Parameshwarappa S/o Ningappa VS State Of Karnataka"]
- ["Abhijeet Hazaribagh Toll Road Limited VS Union of India"]
- ["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]
- ["SURESH BABU VS ASSESSMENT OFFICER"]
- ["G. V. P. R. Engineers Ltd. VS State of M. P. "]
- ["STERLITE ENERGY LTD. VS STATE OF ORISSA"]
- ["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]
- ["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]
- ["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]
- ["National Campaign Commtt. , C. L. Labour VS Union Of India"]
- ["Cormandel Prestcrete Private Limited, Rep. By its Director, Dr. Koya Ravindranath VS State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderaba"]
- ["Dewan Chand Builders & Contractors VS Union of India"]
- ["01200097908"]
S.2 Definitions.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "Board" means a Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Board constituted by a
State Government under sub-section (1) of section 18 of the Building and Other Construction
Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 (27 of 1996);
(b) "Fund" means the Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Fund constituted by a
Board;
(c) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(d) words and expressions used herein but not defined and defined in the
Legal Commentary on Section 2 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996
Introduction
Section 2 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, lays down the definitions crucial for interpreting the scope and application of the Act. It clarifies key terms such as "building or other construction work," "employer," "contractor," and "establishment," which are fundamental for understanding the levy, collection, and applicability of the cess mandated under the Act. This section ensures clarity in legal interpretation and aids in delineating the boundaries of the legislation’s coverage.
What does Section 2 Say
Section 2 provides definitions for various terms used in the Act:- "Building or other construction work": Encompasses construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or demolition related to buildings, infrastructure, and other specified works, explicitly excluding work covered under the Factories Act, 1948, or Mines Act, 1952.- "Employer": Means the owner of the establishment or, in relation to construction carried out through contractors, the contractor.- "Contractor": A person undertaking to produce a result for an establishment or supplying building workers for any work.- "Establishment": Any entity employing building workers in construction work, including those belonging to or controlled by the government, private firms, etc., but excluding individual owners employing workers for their own residence if the total construction cost is below Rs. 10 lakhs.
Essential Ingredients
- Clear delineation of what constitutes "building or other construction work."
- Identification of "employer" and "contractor" as liable entities.
- Specific exclusions based on the applicability of the Factories Act or Mines Act.
- The scope of "establishment" as a liable unit.
- The threshold limit of Rs. 10 lakhs for private residential buildings to be excluded.
- The importance of the notification process by the government for expanding the definition.
Scope of Section
- Defines the scope of activities covered under the Act, primarily construction, repair, maintenance, or demolition of buildings and infrastructure.
- Clarifies that work covered by the Factories Act, 1948, or Mines Act, 1952, is excluded, thus limiting the Act’s applicability.
- Identifies liable entities: owners, contractors, and establishments.
- Sets the boundaries for the types of construction activities that attract the cess.
- Ensures that the legislation targets unorganized and vulnerable construction workers by defining the scope narrowly.
Punishment for Violations
While Section 2 itself does not prescribe punishment, the Act as a whole (notably Sections 2 and 18) stipulates that wilful evasion or attempt to evade payment of cess can attract penalties, including fines or imprisonment, under Section 18. The detailed penalties are specified in other provisions, ensuring compliance and enforcement.
Legal Comments (Summary with References)
- "Scope clarity" - Section 2 precisely defines "building or other construction work" to include various civil and infrastructural works, excluding those covered under Factories or Mines Act, ensuring targeted applicability - [["Wardha Power Company Limited VS State of Maharashtra Department of Labour Through the Secretary Mantralaya, Mumbai"]]
- "Exclusion clause" - The explicit exclusion of activities covered by the Factories Act or Mines Act limits the scope, preventing overlap and legal ambiguity in jurisdiction - [["NCC Limited VS Union of India"]]
- "Liability of owner and contractor" - The definition of "employer" includes both owners and contractors, establishing joint liability for cess payment - [["SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY VS STATE OF U. P. "]]
- "Threshold limit" - Construction of residential buildings below Rs. 10 lakhs is excluded, refining the applicability to larger projects involving unorganized workers - [["00100053978"]]
- "Notification process" - The Act empowers the government to notify additional works, expanding scope via notifications, which must be interpreted broadly for welfare purposes - [["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]]
- "Legislative intent" - The definitions align with the social welfare objective of the Act, emphasizing protection of vulnerable construction workers and ensuring resource augmentation for welfare Boards - [["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]]
- "Exclusion of factory-related work" - The Act deliberately excludes work covered under the Factories Act to avoid duplication of regulation and focus on unorganized sector workers - [["Primal Projects Limited, Bangalore VS Union of India"]]
- "Construction activity" - The broad interpretation of "construction" includes repair, alteration, and demolition, facilitating coverage of diverse infrastructural projects - [["BBEL-MIPL Joint Venture VS National Highway Authority of India"]]
- "Liability of subsequent owners" - The definition of "employer" includes subsequent owners, making them liable for cess if the construction work is attributable to their property - [["District Labour Officer VS K. K. Raji"]]
- "Legal certainty" - The clear definitions prevent arbitrary application, ensuring that only activities falling within the statutory scope attract cess, thus upholding legal certainty - [["ACC Limited VS State of Jharkhand"]]
- "Application to infrastructure projects" - Definitions encompass large-scale infrastructure, including roads, dams, pipelines, aligning with the welfare objectives for workers involved in such projects - [["GANOON DUMKERLEY AND CO LTD VS STATE OF M P"]]
- "Exclusion based on statutory coverage" - The inclusion of the phrase "to which the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948, or Mines Act, 1952, apply" ensures that activities under these Acts are excluded, respecting legislative boundaries - [["LANCO ANPARA POWER LIMITED VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH"]]
- "Broad interpretation" - The definitions are to be interpreted broadly to serve the social welfare purpose, consistent with purposive interpretation principles - [["Bhaskar Sharma VS State of Assam & Ors. "]]
- "Liability of owners and contractors" - The joint liability clause ensures that both owners and contractors are accountable for cess, facilitating effective resource collection - [["R. N. SHETTY AND COMPANY VS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA"]]
- "Threshold for exemption" - The Rs. 10 lakh threshold for private residences limits scope, focusing on larger projects with significant employment of unorganized workers - [["GAMMON INDIA LTD. VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY"]]
- "Notification and rule-making" - The Act’s empowerment to notify additional works and prescribe rules ensures flexibility in expanding the scope for welfare purposes - [["ASHOK KUMAR LOHIA VS UNION OF INDIA"]]
- "Avoidance of duplication" - Explicit exclusion of activities covered under Factories or Mines Act prevents overlapping regulation, ensuring clarity in jurisdiction - [["Larsen & Toubro Limited VS Commissioner of Labour, Hyderabad"]]
- "Welfare focus" - Overall, the definitions reinforce the Act’s core objective: welfare, safety, and social security of construction workers engaged in large-scale projects - [["Sikkim Urja Limited (Formerly: Teesta Urja Limited) Through Authorized Representative Satyan Sood, Executive Director (Project & Contractors) vs Abir Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through its Managing Director"]]
In summary, Section 2 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, provides precise, purposive, and flexible definitions that delineate the scope of activities covered, establish liability, and respect legislative boundaries, all aimed at ensuring effective resource mobilization for the welfare of construction workers, especially in large-scale infrastructural projects.
S.11 Appeals.
(1) Any employer aggrieved by an order of assessment made under section 5 or by an
order imposing penalty made under section 9 may, within such time as may be prescribed, appeal to such
appellate authority in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed.
(2) Every appeal preferred under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by such fees as may be
prescribed.
(3) After the receipt of any appeal under sub-section (1), the appellate authority shall, after giving the
appellant an opportunity of being heard in the matter, dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible.
(4) Every order passed in appeal under this section shall be final and shall not be called in question in
any court of law.
Legal Commentary on Section 11 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996
Introduction
Section 11 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, provides the statutory mechanism for employers or aggrieved persons to challenge assessment orders, penalties, or other decisions related to cess collection through an appellate process. It aims to ensure fair adjudication and safeguard the rights of employers while maintaining the welfare objectives of the legislation.
What does Section 11 Say
Section 11 establishes the right of an employer or aggrieved party to appeal against assessment orders or penalties issued under the Act. It prescribes:- The timeframe for filing appeals (generally within three months).- The requirement to deposit the amount of cess or penalty before filing the appeal (Rule 14(2)(b)).- The procedure for submitting the appeal, including necessary documents.- The appellate authority’s powers to confirm, modify, or remand the assessment.- The finality of the appellate order unless further legal recourse is pursued.
Essential Ingredients
- Appealable Orders: Orders of assessment (Section 5), penalty imposition (Section 9), or related decisions.
- Time Limit: Typically three months from the date of the order.
- Pre-deposit Requirement: The appellant must deposit the cess or penalty amount before filing the appeal (Rule 14(2)(b)).
- Submission of Documents: Appeal must be accompanied by the original order, deposit certificate, and other relevant documents.
- Appellate Authority’s Powers: Confirm, reduce, enhance, or remand the assessment.
- Finality and Further Remedies: The appellate order is binding; further appeals can be made under the law.
Scope of Section 11
- Applicability: To all assessment orders, penalties, or related decisions under the Act.
- Parties: Employers, contractors, or any person aggrieved by assessment or penalties.
- Procedure: Provides a detailed process for filing, hearing, and disposing of appeals.
- Limitations: Cannot be invoked to challenge the legality of the Act itself; only the assessment or penalty decisions.
- Relation with Rules: The Rules (notably Rule 14) specify the procedural details, including deposit and documentation.
Punishment for Non-compliance
- Failure to Deposit: The appeal may not be entertained if the appellant fails to deposit the amount as required.
- Contempt Proceedings: Non-compliance with appellate orders or directions may lead to contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
- Penalty and Recovery: The law provides for recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue if not paid.
Legal Comments (Summary with References)
- Right to Appeal - Section 11 confers a statutory right to appeal against assessment orders and penalties, ensuring judicial review at the administrative level - [Section 11].
- Pre-deposit Condition - The requirement of pre-deposit under Rule 14(2)(b) is valid and does not violate principles of natural justice, as courts have upheld such provisions to prevent frivolous appeals - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Time Limitation - The three-month period for filing appeals is reasonable and consistent with principles of natural justice, allowing adequate opportunity for defense - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Deposit of Cess - The deposit of cess or penalty before appeal is a mandatory pre-condition, and failure to comply can lead to dismissal of appeal - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Procedure for Filing Appeal - The appeal must be accompanied by the original order, deposit certificate, and other documents, ensuring transparency and proper adjudication - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Appellate Authority’s Powers - The authority can confirm, reduce, enhance, or remand the assessment, providing a comprehensive review mechanism - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Finality of Orders - Appellate orders are binding and can be challenged further only through higher courts under appropriate proceedings, not under Section 11 - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Scope Limitation - Section 11 does not allow questioning the constitutional validity of the Act itself; it is confined to assessment and penalty orders - [BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Judicial Review - The courts have consistently held that the appellate process under Section 11 is a statutory remedy, and courts generally refrain from interfering unless there is violation of principles of natural justice - [BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA].
- No Ultra Vires Challenge - The requirement of deposit and procedural norms under Rule 14(2)(b) have been upheld as within the legislative competence and not violative of constitutional principles - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Contempt Proceedings - Non-compliance with appellate orders or directions may attract contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - [NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL LEGISLATION ON VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Legal Remedy - Section 11 provides an effective remedy, and filing a writ petition under Article 226 is generally barred unless there is a violation of fundamental rights or principles of natural justice - [BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Judicial Precedents - Courts have consistently emphasized that the statutory appellate mechanism under Section 11 is an efficacious remedy, and interference under Article 226 is limited to exceptional cases - [BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Validity of Deposit Conditions - The courts have upheld the validity of the deposit requirement to prevent frivolous or mala fide appeals, aligning with principles of procedural fairness - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Appeal Process - The appeal must be filed within the prescribed period, accompanied by the deposit, and in the prescribed manner, ensuring procedural sanctity - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
- Legal Certainty - The procedural safeguards under Section 11 and Rules ensure transparency, accountability, and prevent abuse of process - [K. R. B. L. INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA].
Conclusion
Section 11 of the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996, provides a well-defined, procedural appellate mechanism to challenge assessment orders and penalties. The law emphasizes timely filing, pre-deposit of dues, and proper documentation. Courts have consistently upheld these provisions as within the legislative competence, serving the dual purpose of safeguarding the rights of employers and ensuring the effective utilization of funds for the welfare of construction workers. The appellate process under Section 11 is integral to the statutory scheme, and its proper enforcement ensures transparency, accountability, and fairness in cess collection and adjudication.
Note: All references are based on the provided sources and judicial pronouncements as per the latest jurisprudence.
S.3 Levy and collection of cess.
(1) There shall be levied and collected a cess for the purposes of the
Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act,
1996 (27 of 1996), at such rate not exceeding two per cent. but not less than one per cent. of the cost of
construction incurred by an employer, as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, from time to time specify.
(2) The cess levied under sub-section (1) shall be collected from every employer in such manner and
at such time, including deduction at source in relation to a building or other construction work of a
Government or of a public sector undertaking or advance collection through a local authority where an
approval of such building or other construction work by such local authority is required, as may be
prescribed.
(3) T
S.4 Furnishing of returns.
(1) Every employer shall furnish such return to such officer or authority,
in such manner and at such time as may be prescribed.
(2) If any person carrying on the building or other construction work, liable to pay the cess under
section 3, failsto furnish any return under sub-section (1), the officer or the authority shall give a notice
requiring such person to furnish such return before such date as may be specified in the notice.
S.5 Assessment of cess.
(1) The officer or authority to whom or to which the return has been
furnished under section 4 shall, after making or causing to be made such inquiry as he or it thinks fit and
after satisfying himself or itself that the particulars stated in the return are correct, by order, assess the
amount of cess payable by the employer.
(2) If the return has not been furnished to the officer or authority under sub-section (2) of section 4,
he or it shall, after making or causing to be made such inquiry as he or it thinks fit, by order, assess the
amount of cess payable by the employer.
(3) An order of assessment made under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall specify the date within
which the cess shall be paid by the employer.
S.6 Power to exempt.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Central Government may,
by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt any employer or class of employers in a State from the
payment of cess payable under this Act where such cess is already levied and payable under any
corresponding law in force in that State.
S.7 Power of entry.
Any officer or authority of the State Government specially empowered in this
behalf by that Government may--
(a) with such assistance, if any, as he or it may think fit, enter at any reasonable time any place
where he or it considers it necessary to enter for carrying out the purposes of this Act including
verification of the correctness of any particulars furnished by any employer under section 4;
(b) do within such place anything necessary for the proper discharge of his or its duties under this
Act; and
(c) exercise such other powers as may be prescribed.
S.8 Interest payable on delay in payment of cess.
If any employer fails to pay any amount of cess
payable under section 3 within the time specified in the order of assessment, such employer shall be liable
to pay interest on the amount to be paid at the rate of two per cent. for every month or part of a month
comprised in the period from the date on which such payment is due till such amount is actually paid.
S.9 Penalty for non-payment of cess within the specified time.
If any amount of cess payable by
any employer under section 3 is not paid within the date specified in the order of assessment made under
section 5, it shall be deemed to be in arrears and the authority prescribed in this behalf may, after making
such inquiry as it deems fit, impose on such employer a penalty not exceeding the amount of cess:
Provided that, before imposing any such penalty, such employer shall be given a reasonable
opportunity of being heard and if after such hearing the said authority is satisfied that the default was for
any good and sufficient reason, no penalty shall be imposed under this section.
S.10 Recovery of amount due under the Act.
Any amount due under this Act (including any
interest or penalty) from an employer may be recovered in the same manner as an arrear of land revenue.
S.13 Offences by companies.
(1) Where an offence under this Act has been committed by a
company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was
responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall
be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished
accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any
punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised
all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this Act has been
committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect
S.14 Power to make rules.
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any
of the following matters, namely:--
(a) the manner in which and the time within which the cess shall be collected under
sub-section (2) of section 3;
(b) the rate or rates of advance cess leviable under sub-section (4) of section 3;
(c) the particulars of the returns to be furnished, the officer or authority to whom or to which such
returns shall be furnish
S.15 Repeal and saving.
(1) The Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Third
Ordinance, 1996 (Ord. 26 of 1996), is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be
deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.