2002(3) Supreme 155
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi)
S.P. Bharucha, CJI., N. Santosh Hegde and Arijit Pasayat, JJ.
M/s. Grasim Industries Limited -Appellant
versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 1951 of 1998
Decided on 4-4-2002
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Joseph Vellapally, Senior Advocate Ms. Rohina Nath, Ms.Veronika Mohan, Umesh Kumar Khaitan, Advocates.
For the Respondent : Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General, Prateek Jalan, Ms. Smita Inna and B.K. Prasad, Advocates.
Held : The Note 1 (a) of Chapter 84, as noted above, is clear and unambiguous. It does not speak of a class, category or genus followed by general words. The rule of ejusdem generis has, therefore, no application. Above being the position this appeal has no merit and is dismissed. (Paras 11 & 12)
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.-In this appeal under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the Act ), the only question that falls for adjudication is whether Karbate Tubes made of artificial graphite impregnated with Phenolic resin which are parts of Heat exchangers are classifiable under Tariff Item: sub-heading 6815.10 in First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (in short Tariff Act ) as held by the Revenue, or under sub-heading 8419.50 as claimed by the assessee-importer.
2 . Factual scenario needs to be noted in brief. Orders were placed by the assessee on a foreign manufacturer for supply of 14700 Karbate Tubes which were supplied during April and July, 1992. An order was passed by the Assistant Collector of Customs (Appraising Group III) classifying the goods under Chapter heading 68.15 and sub-headings 6815.10, whereby the demand raised by the Appraiser was confirmed. Appeal filed before the Collector (Appeals) did not bring any relief to the assessee. Matter was carried in further appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (in short Tribunal ). As there was difference in view between two members of the Tribunal, the matter was referred to a larger Bench which by the impugned order dated 24.11.1997 held that the goods were rightly classified under Chapter 68 and not Chapter 84. The main ground which appears to have been pressed before the Tribunal by the assessee was that the Karbate Tubes which are made of artificial graphite cannot be classified under tariff heading 68.15, as according to it, same applies only to natural graphite. The Tribunal did not find any substance in his plea. Reference was made to the Harmonized System Nomenclature (in short HSN ) and it observed that Karbate Tubes made of artificial graphite being non-electric articles made of graphite fall under Chapter sub-heading 6815.10. It was further held that though this is a part of machinery which may otherwise attract sub-heading 8419.50, but the same is not applicable in view of the exclusion in Note 1(a) of Chapter 84.
3. In support of the appeal, learned counsel for the assessee-appellant submitted that the tubes in question are classifiable under Chapter 84 as parts of Heat exchangers, are not excluded by Note 1 (a) of Chapter 84, and are to be classified under Entry 84.19. With reference to the Note 1(a) of Chapter 84, it is submitted that by application of the ejusdem generis principles, only such articles which are similar to millstones or grindstones are excluded. In reply, learned Attorney General submitted that the language of the provision in question is clear, and if the interpretation sought to be put by the assessee is accepted, it would mean a complete transformation of the provision by addition/deletion of certain words, which is not permissible.
4. In order to appreciate rival submissions, it would be proper to take note of the entries on which the assessee and the Revenue have placed reliance. In Chapter 68 Section XIII (Articles of stone, plaster, cement, asbestos, mica, or similar materials: ceramic products; glass and glassware), heading No. 68.15 reads as under:
Heading No. 68.15-"Articles of stone or of other mineral substances (including articles of peat), not elsewhere specified or included"
Sub-heading No. 6815.10- Non-electrical articles of graphite or other carbon" 65%
In Note 1 of Chapter 84 it is provided as follows:
"1. This Chapter does not cover:
(a) Millstones, grindstones or other articles of Chapter 68;
(b) Appliances or machinery (for example, pumps) or parts thereof, of ceramic material (Chapter 69);
(c) Laboratory glassware (heading No. 70.17); machinery appliances or other articles for technical uses or parts thereof, of glass (heading No. 70.19) or 70.20);
(d) Articles of heading No. 73.21 or 73.22 or similar articles of other base metals (Chapter 74 to 76 or 78 to 81);
(
Gwalior Rayons Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. v. Custodian of Vested Forests, Palghat and Anr.
Union of India & Anr. v. Deoki Nandan Aggarwal
Harbhajan Singh v. Press Council of India and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. v. Delhi High Court Bar Association and Or.
Navin Chandra Mafatlal v. The Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay City
Collector of Customs, Bombay v. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Price Water House & Anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.