B.N.AGARWAL, R.C.LAHOTI
Dhannalal – Appellant
Versus
Kalawatibai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Lahoti, J.-Leave granted.
2. The suit premises in these two appeals are two shops situated in M.T. Cloth Market, Indore on the ground-floor of a building. The property was owned by late Krishnadas. He inducted the two appellants in the two shops as tenants for non-residential purpose. Krishnadas died on 8.7.1995. His ownership and right of reversion as landlord have devolved on his widow - Smt. Kalawatibai and two sons - Govinda and Hemant. These three are the respondents in these appeals. They initiated the proceedings for eviction of the two appellants in December 1995. The case of the respondents is that the shop in the occupation of appellant Dhannalal is required bona fide for starting the business of Govinda, the respondent No.2, while the shop in the occupation of the other appellant, M/s.Tulsidas Sureshchandra is required by the respondent Hemant for shifting and continuing his ready-made garments business which he is presently running in a rented accommodation situated in Gorakund locality, at a little distance from the building in question. It is alleged that the respondents do not own or possess any other accommodation of their own suitable to satisfy the
Messrs. Importers and Manufacturers Ltd. v. Pheroze Framroze Taraporewala & Ors.
Nrisingha Charan Nandy Choudhry v. Rajniti Prasad Singh & Ors.
Ravi Dutt Sharma v. Ratanlal Bhargava
Sri Ram Pasricha v. Jagannath & Ors.
Kanta Goel v. B.P. Pathan & Ors.
Pal Singh v. Sunder Singh (dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
Smt. Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar & Ors.
Shiv Sarup Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.