R.F.NARIMAN, SANJIV KHANNA, SURYA KANT
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, a bank that has given a home loan to an allottee can indeed be considered a financial creditor.
Here is the reasoning based on the text:
In summary, the bank is a financial creditor of the allottee because it has advanced money against the consideration for the time value of money, regardless of the tripartite arrangement with the developer.
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. The large number of writ petitions that have been filed in this Court challenge the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”), pursuant to a report prepared by the Insolvency Law Committee dated 26th March, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the “Insolvency Committee Report”). The amendments so made deem allottees of real estate projects to be “financial creditors” so that they may trigger the Code, under Section 7 thereof, against the real estate developer. In addition, being financial creditors, they are entitled to be represented in the Committee of Creditors by authorised representatives. The amendments so made to the Code are as follows:
PROVISIONS OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 BEING CHALLENGED
1. Explanation to Section 5(8)(f):
“5. Definitions
In this part, unless the context otherwise requires, –
(8) “financial debt” means a debt along with interest, if any, which is disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money and includes-
(f)
Chitra Sharma v. Union of India
Swiss Ribbons v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 17 - Relied upon [Para 5]
S. Sundaram Pillai v. V.R. Pattabiraman
KSL & Industries Ltd. v. Arihant Threads Ltd.
Swaraj Infrastructure Private Limited v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Innoventive Industries v. ICICI Bank
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar (1959) SCR 279 - Relied upon [Para 33]
Karnataka Live Band Restaurants Assn. v. State of Karnataka
State of Gujarat v. Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad
V.C. Shukla v. State (Delhi Administration)
Venkateshwara Theatre v. State of A.P.
Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vithal Rao
Subramanian Swamy v. Director, Central Bureau of Investigation
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel Limited
Cellular Operators Association of India v. TRAI
State of Bihar v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry
Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority v. Ranjit Singh Rana
P. Kasilingam v. P.S.G. College of Technology
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti v. Shankar Industries
Mahalakshmi Oil Mills v. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of West Bengal v. Associated Contractors
M. Venugopal v. Divisional Manager, LIC
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Bombay Trust Corporation
K. Kamaraja Nadar v. Kunju Thevar
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited v. Jayaram Chigurupati
Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Broach Borough Municipality
Hindustan Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited v. Registrar, Cooperative Societies
Hiralal Ratanlal v. State of U.P.
Eera (through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf) v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.