L. NAGESWARA RAO, SANJIV KHANNA, B. R. GAVAI
Arce Polymers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Alphine Pharmaceuticals Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The impugned judgment dated 24th January 2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad allows Writ Petition No. 13936 of 2019 preferred by M/s. Alphine Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and Bejjenki Bhaskara Chary (collectively referred to as the ‘Borrower’) and thereby sets aside and quashes the proceedings initiated by M/s. Andhra Bank (the ‘Bank’ for short) for sale of the mortgaged asset, namely, plot No. 66/B-1, Phase-I, IDA Jeedimetla, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Subject Property’) as being in violation of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SARFAESI Act’ and the ‘Rules’ respectively).
3. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the present appeals have been preferred by M/s. Arce Polymers Private Limited, (for convenience, we would refer M/s. Arce Polymers Priva
ITC Limited vs. Blue Coast Hotels Limited and Others
Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank and Another vs. Ashok Saw Mill
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai vs. Virgo Steels, Bombay and Another
S. Raghbir Singh Gill vs. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra and Others
Martin and Harris Ltd. vs. VIth Additional District Judge and Others
Bank of India and Others vs. O.P. Swarnakar and Others
Shri Lachoo Mal vs. Shri Radhey Shyam
Pravesh Kumar Sachdeva vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.