SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA, JJ.
State of Punjab - Petitioner
Versus
Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab and Another - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No 1224 of 2023
Decided On : 10-11-2023
On 22 February 2023, the Council of Ministers of the Government of Punjab forwarded a recommendation to the Governor of Punjab seeking the summoning of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha for its Budget Session commencing on 3 March 2023. The Governor’s refusal to do so led to the institution of a petition before this Court. The Court observed that the Governor was plainly bound by the advice tendered to him by the Council of Ministers. The Sixteenth Punjab Vidhan Sabha was summoned on 3 March 2023. The Speaker adjourned the session sine die on 22 March 2023. On 12 June 2023, the Speaker reconvened the sitting of the session of the Vidhan Sabha on 19 and 20 June 2023. During the course of the session, the Vidhan Sabha passed four Bills. The Governor did not take any action on these Bills. The session of the Vidhan Sabha was sought to be reconvened on 19 October 2023. The Governor cast doubt on the legitimacy and legality of those Bills. The Governor did not ‘declare’ in any public notification that he is withholding his assent to the Bills. The Governor advised the Chief Minister to call for a fresh Monsoon/Winter Session and to forward an agenda setting out the specific business to be conducted so as to enable him to grant permission for the summoning of the House to transact the business. The State of Punjab invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the sessions held on 19 June 2023, 20 June 2023 and 20 October 2023 of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha are legal and that the business transacted by the House is valid, and a mandamus to process the pending Bills in accordance with law. The Court held that the Governor was not empowered to withhold action on the Bills passed by the State Legislature and must act 'as soon as possible'. The Speaker was legally permissible to reconvene the sitting of the Vidhan Sabha after it was adjourned sine die without prorogation. The Court clarified that the Governor must now proceed to take a decision on the Bills which have been submitted for assent on the basis that the sitting of the House was constitutionally valid.
JUDGMENT :
(Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI.)
Table of Contents
| Table of Contents |
| I. Factual background |
| II. Submissions |
| III. Analysis A. The Governor is a symbolic head and cannot withhold action on Bills passed by the State Legislature B. Reconvening a sitting of the Vidhan Sabha which has not been prorogued is permissible in law and is within the exclusive domain of the Speaker 1. Distinction between adjournment and prorogation 2. Exclusive domain of the Speaker to regulate the procedure of the House |
| IV. Conclusion |
1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked by the State of Punjab. The Government of Punjab is aggrieved on the ground that the Governor did not (i) assent to four Bills which were passed by the Vidhan Sabha nor have they been returned; and (ii) furnish a recommendation for the introduction of certain Money Bills in the Vidhan Sabha.
I. Factual background
2. On 22 February 2023, the Council of Ministers of the Government of Punjab forwarded a recommendation to the Governor of Punjab seeking the summoning of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha for its Budget Session commencing on 3 March 2023. The Governor’s refusal to do so, on the ground that he was seeking legal advice, led to the institution of a petition before this Court on 25 February 2023. On 28 February 2023, this Court delivered its judgment in the State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab, Writ Petition (Civil) No 302 of 2023. This Court observed that:
3. While concluding its judgment, this Court had the following observations on the broader aspects of mature political governance in a democracy:
4. Following the decision of this Court, the Sixteenth Punjab Vidhan Sabha was summoned on 3 March 2023. The Speaker adjourned the session sine die on 22 March 2023. On 12 June 2023, acting in pursuance of the powers conferred by the second proviso to Rule 16 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Punjab Vidhan Sabha (Punjab Legislative Assembly)2[“Rules of Procedure”], the Speaker reconvened the sitting of the session of the Vidhan Sabha on 19 and 20 June 2023. During the course of the session, the Vidhan Sabha passed four Bills, namely:
(ii) Punjab Affiliated Colleges (Security of Service) (Amendment) Bill 2023;
(iii) Punjab Universities Law (Amendment) Bill 2023; and
(iv) Punjab Police (Amendment) Bill 2023
No action was taken by the Governor on these Bills.
5. Thereafter, the session of the
State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab
The Governor is not empowered to withhold action on the Bills passed by the State Legislature and must act 'as soon as possible'. The Speaker is legally permissible to reconvene the sitting of the Vi....
The Governor holds discretionary power under Article 200 and is not mandated to adhere to a set timeframe for assenting bills.
The court emphasized the need for a graded approach in the suspension of members from the legislative assembly, highlighting that such action should be necessary for the orderly conduct of the House'....
(1) Suspension of BJP MLAs from Maharashtra Legislative Assembly – Suspension of a member must be preferred as a short-term or a temporary measure – Impugned resolution suffers from vice of being unc....
(1) Political imbroglio in State Legislature of Maharashtra – Supreme Court cannot ordinarily adjudicate petitions for disqualification under Tenth Schedule in first instance. There are no extraordin....
The suspension period must adhere to the graded approach outlined in Rule 277, and any suspension beyond the remainder of the session would be contrary to law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in matters concerning the internal functioning of the State Legislature. The court emphasized that the High Co....
The court established that the right to participate in legislative proceedings is not a fundamental right and can be restricted in cases of valid detention, particularly when serious allegations are ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.