IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
Kadar Valli Shaik – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, Ministry of External Affairs – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 1392 & 2896 of 2023 & 38869 of 2022
Decided on : 07-03-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506, 509, 120B - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 & 4 - Passport Act, 1967 - Refusing to renew passport - Punishment for cheating by personation - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property - Forgery of valuable security - Forgery for purpose of cheating - Punishment for criminal conspiracy -Held, authorities can seek NOC in case of renewal of passport which is implicit in Rule-5, with which view Court also in agreement that renewal of passport is also governed by provisions of Passport Act, including Sections 5, 6 and Rules, 1980, submission of learned counsels for petitioners to contrary based on view taken by other High Courts is not acceptable and is rejected - Dispose of.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri P. Sree Ramulu Naidu, Sri Ch. Madhava Rao on behalf of Sri K. V. Aditya Chowday and Sri Surepalli Madhava Rao, learned counsels for the petitioners, Sri G. Arun Showri and Ms. Alekhya Tadasina, learned Central Government Counsel and learned GP for Home for the respondents.
2. As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is common, on the request of the learned counsels for the parties, all these three writ petitions were heard together and are being decided by the common judgment, at this stage.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
3. W.P.No.1392 of 2023 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner for the following relief:
4. The petitioner – Kadar Valli Shair was issued Passport No.L0037632 to work in private company at Kuwait and returned to India in 2011 and got married. Thereafter, he was issued the present passport No.L0037632, valid up to 21.04.2023. Since the validity of the passport is due to expire, he approached the concerned authorities at Kuwait for renewal of his passport vide application reference No.22-2001757970. He was informed through letter No.KUW/CONS/OBJ/607/2022, dated 09.06.2022 that he is an accused in FIR in Crime No.223/2018, dated 02.06.2018 for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and under Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act which was pending trial in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoti and hence he was not recommended for renewal of his passport.
5. The prayer in the writ petition is for direction to the respondents for renewal of the petitioner’s passport.
6. It is not disputed that the criminal case is pending against the petitioner in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoti.
7. Learned GP for Home for the 4th respondent on the basis of the instructions submitted that non-bailable warrants for appearance of the petitioner are issued but could not be executed.
8. W.P.No.2896 of 2023 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners for the following relief:
9. The petitioner – Nalluri Yugandhar, who is a Doctor and completed his MBBS from Pinamaneni Siddhartha Medical College at Vijayawada and left the Germany to complete his higher studies in MS and for that purpose he applied and was granted passport bearing No.K9169975 on 26.03.2013 which is valid from 26.03.2013 to 23.05.2023. A case in FIR No.72/2019 dated 05.04.2019 at Agiripally Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506, 509, 120B IPC was lodged against the petitioner and o
Bachahan Devi v. Nagar Nigam, Gorakhpur
Ganesh Prasad Sah Kesari v. Lakshmi Narayan Gupta
State of Bihar v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
The denial of passport renewal due to pending criminal proceedings is justified under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, applicable to all forms of passport issuance.
Pending criminal proceedings do not bar passport renewal; authorities to process per Act, rules, notifications without routine court NOC; ordinarily 10-year validity; travel permission separate from ....
Pendency of criminal proceedings bars the re-issuance of a passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967; exceptions are subject to specific court orders.
The main legal point established is that the pendency of criminal cases should not lead to denial of passport facilities, as per the Passports Act, 1967 and Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980, and suppo....
Pending criminal proceedings can bar the renewal of a passport under the Passports Act, necessitating compliance with statutory provisions and court permissions for validity.
The pendency of a criminal case does not justify the refusal of passport services, as individuals retain their right to travel freely, protected under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.
The court clarified that individuals facing criminal proceedings can obtain passport renewals based on trial court permits, without needing a separate order to depart from India, affirming the limita....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.