SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 913

VINAY JOSHI, VALMIKI SA MENEZES
Akshay Atmaram Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.V.Manohar, Advocate, A.S.Manohar, Advocate, M.J.Khan, Advocate, S.P.Deshpande, Advocate

JUDGMENT

VINAY JOSHI, J. - Considering the controversy involved in the matter, and by consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, Criminal Appeal is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. Admit.

2. This is an appeal in terms of Sec. 14-A[2] of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Atrocities Act" for short), raising a challenge to the order dtd. 3/9/2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal below Exh.3 in Special Case No.7/2022, rejecting regular bail.

3. The appellant - Akshay came to be arrested by the police of Yavatmal Police Station, District Yavatmal in connection with Crime No.543/2021 for the offence punishable under Ss. 109, 120-B, 302, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Sec. 3[2][v] of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Atrocities Act" for short), and Ss. 3/25 and 4/25 of the Arms Act. Later on the provisions of Sec. 3[1][ii], 3[2], 3[4] of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as "the MCOCA" for short) have been invoked. The appellant had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top