VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Deepu – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Personal affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri P.C. Srivastava, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri J.K. Upadhyay, Additional Government Advocate and Sri Bhaiya Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the informant.
3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 3.7.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 0271 of 2024, under Sections 376 (2)(n), 354, 147, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, PS Maudaha, District Hamirpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
4. On 23.7.2024 the following order was passed:
Learned AGA for State submits that the victim is aged about 14 years and she was medically examin
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Others Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others
Neena Aneja & Another Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. (2022) 2 SCC 161
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
FIRs for offences committed before new laws must be registered under IPC, with investigations following BNSS procedures.
Crime and investigation – If any offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, then if F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of new criminal laws, then same will be registered unde....
The court ruled that bail applications filed after the BNSS's enforcement for FIRs registered before its enactment must comply with the BNSS provisions, emphasizing the retrospective application of p....
The court established that pending matters under the CrPC, 1973, are preserved by the BNSS, 2023, while new incidents post-enactment must adhere to the BNSS.
The repeal of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, effective from 01.07.2024, mandates that all new petitions must be filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
FIR registered under wrong law can be quashed but complaint can be retained and filed afresh under right law.
State notification deemed to amend cognizability status of offenses under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; mala fide motives behind F.I.R. questioned.
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining....
(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 531(2)(a) – Not only pending trial / appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of BNSS, sha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.