Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Bank locker sizes are not explicitly detailed in the sources; instead, the emphasis is on security measures, operational procedures, and legal responsibilities. Lockers are typically secured with a dual-lock system, and sizes vary based on customer needs and bank offerings. The legal framework underscores the importance of proper inventory, sealing protocols, and the bank's role as a custodian, not an owner, of locker contents. Disputes often revolve around access and contents, with courts holding banks responsible only if negligence is established.
Are you considering renting a bank locker for your valuables but wondering about available bank locker sizes? Many customers ask: What are the standard dimensions or categories of bank lockers in India? This is a common query, especially when planning storage for jewelry, documents, or other precious items. However, as we'll explore, Indian legal documents and regulations do not explicitly address locker sizes, focusing instead on the legal relationship between banks and customers, security protocols, and liability issues.
In this comprehensive guide, we analyze key RBI circulars, judicial decisions, and industry practices to provide clarity. Note: This is general information based on available sources and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Bank Locker Sizes – Does Indian law specify standard sizes, dimensions, or categories for safe deposit lockers offered by banks? From RBI guidelines to court rulings, the answer is clear: No specific provisions exist on physical dimensions. The emphasis is on the bailor-bailee relationship, duty of care, and operational security rather than size classifications. Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233
As stated in RBI circulars, It is clarified that the relationship between the bank and the locker hirer is in the nature of a 'bailor and bailee'. Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233 This framework governs responsibilities but leaves locker sizes to bank discretion and customer needs.
Legal documents, including RBI Circulars from 2006 and 2007, discuss locker hire agreements, liability disclaimers, and safe custody but omit any mention of standard locker sizes or categories (e.g., small, medium, large). Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233
The Delhi High Court in Jagdish Chandra Trikha v. Punjab National Bank examined a sealed box of gold ornaments entrusted to the bank, stressing bailment duties: The Box was entrusted to the defendant Bank... It was accepted by the Bank as a bailee and it was expected that the usual care which is demanded on such matters would be undertaken. Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233 Notably, locker size was irrelevant to the ruling.
While sizes aren't regulated, sources highlight robust security measures that apply regardless of dimensions:
This ensures security for contents, irrespective of locker size. Examples include lockers like No. 24 at Andhra Bank K. Hariprasad VS Central Bureau of Investigation - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 566 - 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 566 or No. 621 at State Bank of India Senthil Jothi VS Inspector of Police, Coimbatore - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2754 - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2754, where specific numbers are noted but dimensions are not.
Banks must verify contents in the presence of directors or staff: In the presence of two directors of the bank, the locker was opened and verified the things in the locker. Sundaramurthy VS State Rep. by Inspector of Police, CCI/WCID, Thiruvallur - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 2168 - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 2168
Banks often position themselves as lessors: The relationship between the bank and the locker-hirer is in the nature of lessee and lessor where lessee is the bank and the lessor is the customer. Mohan Singh Chouhan S/o Late Phool Singh Chouhan VS State of Bihar - 2018 Supreme(Pat) 649 - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 649 They disclaim liability for contents, as Banks have no liability for the things/goods kept in their lockers by the customers. Mohan Singh Chouhan S/o Late Phool Singh Chouhan VS State of Bihar - 2018 Supreme(Pat) 649 - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 649
RTI replies indicate banks aren't fully absolved in some cases. Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233
Legal precedents reinforce that locker size is secondary to procedures:
Although no legal standards dictate sizes:
Bank locker sizes are not governed by specific Indian laws or RBI guidelines; they vary by bank and branch, with legal focus on bailment, security (dual locks, master keys), and limited liability. Courts prioritize duty of care over physical attributes. Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233Mohan Singh Chouhan S/o Late Phool Singh Chouhan VS State of Bihar - 2018 Supreme(Pat) 649 - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 649
For secure storage, prioritize procedural compliance over size. Future RBI updates might standardize aspects, but currently, customer vigilance is key.
Disclaimer: This analysis draws from cited sources like RBI circulars Amitabha Dasgupta VS United Bank of India - 2021 4 Supreme 233 and cases. Laws evolve; seek professional advice tailored to your circumstances.
#BankLockers, #LockerSizesIndia, #RBIGuidelines
Andhra Bank, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. (a) Locker No. 24 (b) Savings Bank Account No. 680 of Mr. K. Hari Prasad (c) Savings Bank Account No. 201394 of Smt. K. Madhavi 2. ... Account bearing No. 680 (presently No. 02181001100680) and also locker No. 24. The 2nd Petitioner also held S.B. Account No. 201394 (Presently No. 021810025201394) in the said bank. ... The 1st Respondent did not tak....
Safe locker of the Bank was having a double locking system and each key was assigned among two staffs, namely, petitioner and Branch Manager. ... There are serious charges levelled against the petitioner to the extent that there were theft of a sum of Rs.15,20,849.35/-from the safe locker of the Respondent-Bank. 5. ... If there is no break open of safe locker of the Respondent-Bank and e....
Xavier Regina Marie has handed over all original fixed deposit receipts, bank locker key and original Will to the plaintiff, even during her life time and as a result of which, the plaintiff is in custody of all original fixed deposit receipts and bank locker keys and the original Will. ... the Fixed Deposits standing in the name of the deceased Xavier Regina Marie and for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant #HL....
On 06.05.2022, the petitioner''s house was searched by the respondent and locker key bearing No.9 and the locker No.621, State Bank of India, NRI Branch, Salem was recovered. ... Till date there is no material placed before this Court that the petitioner or the properties as well as the documents recovered from the locker key bearing No.9 and locker No.621 has any connection with the case which is under investigation. ... ....
The bank has a master key to the locker and the customer can gain complete access to the locker only when the bank uses its own key to the locker. Therefore, a combination of the bank’s key and the locker holder’s key is required for opening a locker, providing neither with complete access. ... 8.2 An important decision which has considered the modern-day ban....
When they visited the bank, it was found that their locker was sealed by affixing a paper over the same and the deputy manager of the bank removed the paper in their presence and asked them to open the locker. ... It is further alleged that as per the system adopted in the bank for use of locker facility there is no scope for the outsiders or even for the staff of the bank#HL_E....
This document also shows that the locker has been surrendered to the bank on 28.3.23. The appellant Bank has also provided the locker operation record in which all the entries show that only Hetal Chawda (wife) operated the locker. ... Counsel further points to para no.3 of locker agreement which reads as under- “The hirer/s has been fully informed by the Bank that the ....
regarding the locker for which the bank had no answer in defense. ... It was also submitted that as per the locker agreement, the relationship between bank and hirer of the locker is that of “landlord” and “tenant”. The bank do not and cannot have the knowledge about the contents of the locker. ... locker on rent in the Deshapriya Park, Kolkata Branch....
regarding the locker for which the bank had no answer in defense. ... It was also submitted that as per the locker agreement, the relationship between bank and hirer of the locker is that of “landlord” and “tenant”. The bank do not and cannot have the knowledge about the contents of the locker. ... locker on rent in the Deshapriya Park, Kolkata Branch....
of bank locker lies with the concern officer of the bank therefore as per the rules and regulation of the operation of the bank locker it is the responsibility of the bank to keep all the belongings of the customers kept in locker in a safe condition but here in this case when the locker of the the ... It is also admitted fact that the bank#....
The said order was marked as Ex.P.2. P.W.3 is the Secretary of Ponneri Rural Co-operative Bank. In the presence of two directors of the bank, the locker was opened and verified the things in the locker. They were found that all the jewels in the locker are correct. On 24.11.1997, an order was passed by the bank to all the staff in the bank to verify all the accounts and submit their report.
Certainly, it cannot be said that bank owes to the locker hirer the contents of the locker. The articles are kept in the locker only for safe custody and they cannot be said to be in the exclusive possession of the banker. Bank cannot use the contents of locker (just like using the money deposited). So, question arises to whom bank should return the articles after the death of hirer and on the basis of which documents?
The locker holder’s signature should be obtained upon the receipt of such inventory so as to avoid any dispute in the future. Moreover, the locker shall be broken open only in the presence of authorized officials and an independent witness after giving due notice to the locker holder. The bank must prepare a detailed inventory of any articles found inside the locker, after the locker is opened, and make a separate entry in the locker register, before returning them to the locker hold....
The relationship between the bank and the locker-hirer is in the nature of lessee and lessor where lessee is the bank and the lessor is the customer. The locker can only be opened by the locker holder along with master key of the bank. The banks have no liability for the things/goods kept in their lockers by the customers. The customers are made responsible for the valuables he/she keeps in the locker.
The mechanism is such that locker must get closed if the locker holder closes the door and takes out his/her key. 3. Relevant portion of the instructions dated 7.6.1995 issued by the Central Bank of India for taking necessary precautions in the matter of Safe Deposit Lockers are: “(1) The relationship of the Bank and the locker holder is essentially that of a lessor and a lessee and among other things, the Bank as the lessor is duty-bound to ensure safety of the locker, i.e., the sam....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
