Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Constitutional and Legal Framework: The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, conferred coparcenary rights to daughters in Hindu Mitakshara law properties, effective from 09.09.2005. The amendment made daughters coparceners by birth in their own right, similar to sons, regardless of whether their father was alive at the time 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1070, 2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 530, 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1090, 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2248,
Yagnaseni Patel VS General Manager, Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. - Current Civil Cases
.Rights by Birth and Retroactivity: The rights of daughters to coparcenary property are by birth and do not depend on the father's survival at the time of the amendment. Even if the father predeceased before 2005, the daughter’s rights are recognized if she was alive on or after 09.09.2005, as her rights accrue from her birth 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2248, 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 755, 2024 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 97.
Predeceased Daughter’s Share: The share of a predeceased daughter or predeceased child of a predeceased son/daughter is to be allotted to the surviving children or grandchildren of such predeceased persons, based on the principle of representation. This is applicable whether the daughter predeceased before or after 2005, provided the property was not partitioned before the amendment 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1070, 2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 530, 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1090.
Pre-2005 Deaths and Rights: If the father or coparceners died before 09.09.2005, the daughter’s rights as a coparcener do not retroactively attach. However, if the daughter was alive on or after that date, she acquires coparcenary rights from her date of birth, even if her father died earlier. Rights are not dependent on the father's survival at the time of the amendment 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 755, 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 718, 2024 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 97.
Legal Precedents: Supreme Court judgments, including Vineeta Sharma (2020), affirm that daughters' rights are by birth and are unaffected by the death of the father before 2005, provided the daughter was alive on 09.09.2005. The courts have emphasized that the amendment has retrospective effect concerning daughters' rights
Yagnaseni Patel VS General Manager, Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. - Current Civil Cases
, 2024 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 97.Daughter’s Rights if Predeceased Father: If the daughter predeceased her father before the 2005 amendment, she generally would not have inherited coparcenary rights unless she was alive on 09.09.2005. Her legal heirs or descendants could claim her share, especially if the property was not partitioned before 2005.
Rights of Surviving Daughters: Daughters alive on or after 09.09.2005, regardless of whether their father was alive at that time, acquire coparcenary rights by birth. Their rights are unconditional and not dependent on the father's survival 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1070, 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2248.
Predeceased Daughter’s Share: The share of a daughter who died before 2005 is to be distributed among her heirs, not directly to her predeceased children unless the property was not partitioned before the amendment.
Legal Position Post-2005: The 2005 amendment is considered retrospective in effect for daughters' rights, ensuring their entitlement to coparcenary property from their birth date, independent of their father's survival at the time of the amendment.
References:- Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005)- Supreme Court judgments including Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, 2020- Various court rulings interpreting the retrospective effect of the amendment and rights of predeceased daughters
Summary: A daughter who predeceased her father before the 2005 amendment generally did not have coparcenary rights unless she was alive on 09.09.2005. If she was alive, her rights are by birth, and her share is inherited by her heirs if she died before the amendment. The 2005 law grants daughters coparcenary rights from their birth date, with retrospective applicability, ensuring their entitlement irrespective of their father's status at the time of the amendment.
In the complex world of Hindu inheritance law, one question often arises: What is the right of a daughter who predeceased her father before the Amendment to the ? This issue touches on generational wealth, family disputes, and evolving gender equality in property rights. The amendment marked a pivotal shift, granting daughters equal to sons, but its application to predeceased daughters remains nuanced.
This blog post breaks down the legal position, drawing from key judgments and statutory interpretations. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Prior to the , Hindu daughters had limited rights in ancestral (coparcenary) property under . Daughters were not by birth; their inheritance depended on being alive at the father's death or specific customary laws.
The case clarifies: a daughter who predeceased her father before the amendment could not inherit the estate directly. The estate would devolve on the next heirs, typically the sons or .
Effective , the amendment declared daughters as by birth in joint Hindu family property, with rights equal to sons, irrespective of marital status. 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1070 2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 530
Key features:- Rights by birth: Since the right in coparcenary is by birth, it is not necessary that father coparcener should be living as on 9.9.. 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4660 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 613- : Applies to daughters born before (original Act date), but primarily benefits those alive on or after . 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1104
However, for daughters who predeceased their father before , the amendment generally does not confer direct rights unless:- She was alive on the amendment date.- Property partition occurred post-. 2020 0 Supreme(Kar) 128 2007 0 Supreme(Gau) 725
The amendment to conferred on daughters, making them by birth... provided they were alive on the date of the amendment. 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1104
If the daughter died before her father and before :- No direct inheritance: Her legal rights did not pass directly to her estate. Instead, they typically went to her heirs (e.g., her children) only if she had vested interests, which was rare pre-amendment.
- Devolution to next heirs: Sons or inherited. The law prior to did not recognize the predeceased daughter's direct inheritance rights; her rights would be through her heirs, not as a coparcener.
Post-amendment nuances from other sources:- Share allotment to survivors: The share of the pre-deceased child of a pre-deceased son or of such pre-deceased daughter... shall be allotted to the surviving child. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 613- Heirs' claims: Descendants may claim her if unpartitioned pre-, per . 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1070 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1090
rulings have clarified ambiguities:
Yagnaseni Patel VS General Manager, Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. - Current Civil Cases
2024 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 97In the above case, father of the daughter died in , yet court permitted the daughter to claim the right in ancestral property in view of the amendment in . 2020 4 Supreme 193
Other precedents:- Rights independent of father's survival: 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 755 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 718- Pre- deaths limit retroactivity unless daughter alive post-amendment: 1999 0 Supreme(Ori) 252 1956 0 Supreme(All) 251
By virtue of the , the Hindu daughters are kept in the same pedestal as that of a son.
Maj. (Retd. ) Nidhi Singh VS Animesh Singh - Current Civil Cases
2022 0 Supreme(UK) 205Predeceased Daughter’s Share: The share of a predeceased daughter... is to be allotted to the surviving children or grandchildren. (From analysis in sources)
Recommendations:- Review family records, , and partition deeds.- For disputes, reference Vineeta Sharma and consult experts.- Disclaimer: Outcomes vary by facts; seek professional advice.
In summary, while the amendment revolutionized daughters' rights, predeceased daughters before it typically do not benefit directly. Their heirs may step in under specific conditions, promoting fairness in modern Hindu law. Stay informed as courts continue interpreting these evolving rights.
References:- - Key judgments: Vineeta Sharma (), , and cited cases.
#HinduSuccession #DaughterRights #InheritanceLaw
(Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005), in a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, the daughter of a coparcener shall: (a) by birth become a coparcener in her own right the same manner as the son. ... (b) the share of the pre-deceased child of a predeceased son or of a pre-deceased daughter, as such child would have got had he or she been ali....
(4) After the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, no court shall recognise any right to proceed against a son, grandson or great grandson for the recovery of any debt due from his father, grandfather or great grandfather solely on the ground of the pious ... as they would have got had they been alive at the time of partition, shall be allotted to the surviving child of such pre- d....
The properties were disposed by the 1st defendant even before coming into force of Amendment Act of 2005 and respondents 1 & 2 did not acquire any right. ... The contention of the respondents 1 & 2 that properties are not partitioned and that they are entitled to right under Amendment Act of 2005 is not correct. ... (c) the share of the pre-deceased child of a predecea....
A reading of the above clearly spells out that it is immaterial whether the father or other coparceners were alive on 09.09.2005 as the right of the daughter opens from her birth and is not dependent on her father being alive. ... iii) Section 6(1) of the HAS confers a right by birth to daughter to the coparcenary property of the father by birth. ... ....
137.3 Since the right in coparcenary is by birth, it is not necessary that father coparcener should be living as on 9.9.2005. ... From the discussion of evidence by the learned Principal District Judge, it is found that the learned Principal District Judge had not considered the amendment to the HINDU SUCCESSION ACT as amended in 2005 whereby the daughters are granted right to succeed t....
As such, the daughter has a right to get the property of her father from the date the Amendment Act came into force, i.e., in 2005. 12. ... The adopted child also gets a right equal to the right of his adoptive father in the joint family property from the date of adoption. The daughter is not given a right by birth ....
The coparcenary must exist on 9-9-2005 to enable the daughter of a coparcener to enjoy rights conferred on her. As the right is by birth and not by dint of inheritance, it is irrelevant that a coparcener whose daughter is conferred with the rights is alive or not. ... Till 2005, to be specific 09.09.2005, when the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005#HL_EN....
Since the right in coparcenary is by birth, it is not necessary that father coparcener should be living as on 9-9-2005. 137.4. ... they would have got had they been alive at the time of partition, shall be allotted to the surviving child of such pre-deceased son or of such pre-deceased daughter; and (c) the share of the pre-deceased child of a pre-dece....
(Amendment) Act, 2005 being on 09.09.2005?” ... The argument raised that if the father or any other coparcener died before the 2005 Amendment Act, the interest of the father or other coparcener would have already merged in the surviving coparcenary and there was no coparcener alive from whom the daughter would succeed. ... The amended provisions of Sec....
After the 2005 Amendment Act, under Section 6 daughter was admitted to coparcenary like son. ... of the HINDU SUCCESSION ACT (Amendment) Act, 2005. ... Lagnu Mahto and Paras Nath Mahto both pre-deceased their father Banno Mahto. Lagnu Mahto died first prior to the last cadastral survey. ... The second limb of argument is based on ratio laid down by Supreme Court in ....
They were given rights of a coparcener equal to those of the sons. However, by virtue of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the Hindu daughters are kept in the same pedestal as that of a son. Then, by the passing of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the Parliament recogniged the absolute right of a daughter over the self-acquired property of her father.
Then, by the passing of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the Parliament recogniged the absolute right of a daughter over the self-acquired property of her father. In the Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937, for the first time, the rights of the widowed Hindu women were recognized by the Central Assembly by this Act. They were given rights of a coparcener equal to those of the sons. However, by virtue of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the Hindu da....
(5) Whether the Amendment has given a right by birth on the daughter and whether it would relate back to the date of her birth and time of the death of her father co-parcener, cannot have a bearing on the rights of the daughter? (6) Whether an exparte Decree, until set aside is effective and binding on the parties like a decree on merits? (4) When the proviso to Section 6(1) of The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act [Act 39 of 2005) provides for the non-validation clause, only ....
In the above case, father of the daughter died in 2001, yet court permitted the daughter to claim the right in ancestral property in view of the amendment in 2005. In such circumstances, in our view, Prakash, (2016) 2 SCC 36, would still hold precedent on the issue of death of coparcener for the purpose of right of daughter in ancestral property. It is pertinent to note here that recently, this Court in Danamma v. Amar, (2018) 3 SCC 343, dealt, inter alia, with the dispute of....
It is pertinent to note here that recently, this Court in Danamma @ Suman Surpur Vs. Amar, (2018) 1 Scale 657 dealt, inter-alia, with the dispute of daughter's right in the ancestral property. In such circumstances, in our view, Prakash (supra), would still hold precedent on the issue of death of coparcener for the purpose of right of daughter in ancestral property. On a perusal of the judgment and after having regard to the peculiar facts of the Danamma (supra), it is evident that the Divisio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
