AI Overview...

Principal Employer and Ramu's Role - The case clarifies that Ramu is the run owner of Ramesh Cashew Industry, not Sadasivan, and that the industry is run by Ramu, son of Sadasivan. The Labour Court found that Sadasivan was not the original employer, and that Ramu was the principal employer, including the manager or owner of the factory. Respondents 1 & 2, who purchased the property, are considered transferees liable for statutory obligations. ["The Regional Director, vs R. Jeyasekar, - Madras"]
Divisional Manager's Identity and Case Context - The case involving the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Van Vikas Nigam Ltd. references the Divisional Manager as a key figure, but does not specify a direct conflict with Ramu Ramesh. It emphasizes that the services of employees like Amarilal Parte and Ramesh are protected and that the court has not expressed opinions on merits but ensures no premature termination during legal proceedings. ["2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 38608"]
Ramu in Legal Proceedings and Disputes - Multiple cases involve a person named Ramu, notably Ramu Pasigamaa and Ramu in various agricultural labor and civil disputes, as well as cases where Ramu is a party in consumer and civil suits. In the district forum and NCDRC cases, Ramu appears as a complainant or involved party, often alongside other agricultural laborers or in settlement proceedings. ["2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 29965"], ["The Regional Director, vs R. Jeyasekar, - Madras"], ["The Regional Director, vs R. Jeyasekar, - Madras"]
Ramu in Bank and Arbitration Cases - Several cases refer to Ramu in the context of bank disputes and arbitration, notably Ramu Rajendran and cases involving SBI bank and arbitration appointments. These cases show Ramu involved in financial litigation, civil suits, and arbitration proceedings, with no direct reference to a Divisional Manager vs Ramu Ramesh conflict but indicating Ramu's involvement in various legal disputes. ["2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2739"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2740"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2741"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2742"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 38252"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 11235"], ["2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 74004"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11643"]
Overall Conclusion - The provided sources do not explicitly document a specific case titled Divisional Manager vs Ramu Ramesh. Instead, they depict Ramu involved in multiple legal disputes across different contexts—labor, civil, consumer, and arbitration—often as a party or complainant, with some cases mentioning a Divisional Manager or managerial authority but not in direct opposition to Ramu Ramesh. The primary relevant point is Ramu's role as owner or principal employer in the Ramesh Cashew Industry case, and his involvement in various legal proceedings, but no single case titled as Divisional Manager vs Ramu Ramesh is explicitly identified in the provided materials.

Analysis of Divisional Manager Disputes and Alias Variations in Indian Court Records

Divisional Manager vs Ramu Ramesh: Uncovering the Case Details

In the realm of Indian legal research, locating specific court cases can be challenging, especially when dealing with common names like Ramu or Ramesh and titles involving corporate roles such as Divisional Manager. A recent query asked: Can you find the case the Divisional Manager Vs Ramu Ramesh? This question highlights the intricacies of navigating vast legal databases, where partial matches and contextual overlaps often complicate searches.

This blog post dives into our comprehensive search across provided legal documents, summarizing findings, integrating insights from related sources, and offering practical recommendations. While we couldn't pinpoint an exact match, we'll explore close references in insurance, transport, and criminal matters. Note: This is general information based on available documents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance.

Understanding the Query and Search Approach

The case title Divisional Manager vs. Ramu @ Ramesh suggests a potential dispute, possibly in insurance claims, employment, or motor accidents—common areas where Divisional Manager appears, often representing entities like Life Insurance Corporation (LIC), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC), or railways. Ramu @ Ramesh implies an alias, typical in Indian judgments.

Our analysis began with targeted document reviews, focusing on mentions of these names and roles. Key documents scanned include criminal records, insurance appeals, and High Court orders. Here's what emerged.

Key Findings: No Exact Match, But Notable References

Absence of Direct Case

The specific case titled Divisional Manager vs. Ramu @ Ramesh does not appear in the reviewed legal documents. No judgment directly links a Divisional Manager as plaintiff against an individual named Ramu @ Ramesh in a cohesive dispute.

Mentions of Ramu and Ramesh

Individuals named Ramu and Ramesh surface in unrelated contexts:- Ramu Bhumij and Ramesh Bhumij: A criminal matter where Ramu is accused of killing Ramesh. This is detailed in documents 2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 196 2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 2014, but lacks any Divisional Manager involvement or insurance angle. These appear to be local criminal proceedings without corporate ties.

Divisional Manager Contexts

Divisional Manager frequently denotes managerial roles in public sector undertakings:- References in 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1000, 2005 0 Supreme(AP) 1186, and 2004 0 Supreme(AP) 1504 discuss insurance companies' managerial decisions, but no connection to Ramu or Ramesh.- Typically, these involve claim rejections, policy disputes, or accident compensations.

Insights from Additional Legal Sources

Broader sources reveal tangential connections, enriching our understanding of similar disputes. These snippets from High Courts, Consumer Forums, and District Records provide context on how such names and titles intersect in Indian jurisprudence.

Insurance and Consumer Disputes

In
1. The Branch Manager, LIC of India vs Karimnagar Consumer Counsel
and related appeals 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 29580 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 30576, the Divisional Manager, LIC of India is a party in a consumer complaint (CC.NO.141 OF 2020). Names like Ramu, Ramesh, and others (e.g., Lachavva Pasigamaa Agricultural Labour Ramu ... Allam Ramesh) appear in party lists as agricultural laborers claiming benefits. Quote: The Divisional Manager, LIC of India, Near Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Stadium, Karimnagar ... Ramesh. No direct vs. Ramu @ Ramesh, but highlights LIC Divisional Managers in mass claims.

Transport and Motor Accident Cases

Tamil Nadu cases 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7647 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7645 involve Divisional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., (Vizhupuram Division) in Lok Adalat settlements. Parties include R.Ramu among claimants (1.S.Selvi 2.M.Lakshmi 3.P.Sudha 4.R.Ramu 5.S.Jyothi). Quote: Divisional Manager ... Office at Rangapuram,Vellore ... This case is taken up for settlement before the Lok Adalat.
Railway matters in 2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13880 mention Divisional Railway Manager vs. petitioners including Ramu, a retired Train Manager: Ramu, Aged : 69 years, Occ : Retd. Train Manager.

High Court and Related Judgments

Kerala High Court
The Regional Director, vs R. Jeyasekar,
: Discusses Ramesh Cashew Industry run by Ramu, questioning principal employer under labor laws: the Ramesh Cashew Industry is run by one Ramu ... respondents 1 & 2 had purchased the property and established the same as Ramesh#. No Divisional Manager.
Rajasthan High Court
RANVEER SINGH S/O GULAB SINGH vs KARAN SINGH S/O SHRI BHANWAR SINGH
: Mentions Chanda S/o Shri Ramu, in a banking dispute with managers.

Motor Vehicles Act Precedents

Several sources cite Divisional Manager in accident compensation appeals:- 2022 0 Supreme(Pat) 764: References National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Divisional Manager (2011)14 SCC 639, on income deductions for compensation.- 2020 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1150, 2020 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1122, 2016 0 Supreme(Raj) 1119: Invoke Ranjana Prakash & Ors. vs. Divisional Manager (2011 (14) SCC 639) for enhancing awards under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Quote from 2016 0 Supreme(Raj) 1119: the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ranjana Prakash & Ors. vs. Divisional Manager & Anr., reported in 2011 (14) SCC 639.- These emphasize courts' powers to adjust compensation, relevant if the queried case involves accidents.

Other cases like 2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 1120 discuss disqualifications but no direct link.

Why Might the Exact Case Be Elusive?

Database Limitations: Provided documents cover specific repositories; full access to SCC Online, Manupatra, or e-Courts might reveal it.
Name Variations: Aliases like Ramu @ Ramesh or regional spellings (e.g., Ramu Bhumij) fragment searches.
Jurisdictional Spread: Cases span High Courts (Kerala, Rajasthan, Madras), Consumer Forums, and District Courts, often unpublished.
Common Names: Ramu/Ramesh and Divisional Manager yield high noise in searches.

Recommendations for Further Research

To locate the case:1. Use Legal Databases: Query Indian Kanoon, SCC Online, or LiveLaw with exact title and variations.2. Court Records: Check e-Courts portal by party names, filtering by state (e.g., Tamil Nadu for TNSTC cases).3. Professional Help: Engage lawyers or paralegals for RTI filings to tribunals.4. Keywords to Try: Divisional Manager AND Ramu Ramesh OR Ramu @ Ramesh in insurance/transport contexts.5. Contact Authorities: Reach LIC/TNSTC divisional offices for internal records.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Our search confirms no direct hit for Divisional Manager vs. Ramu @ Ramesh in the documents, but uncovers a web of related disputes in insurance claims

1. The Branch Manager, LIC of India vs Karimnagar Consumer Counsel

, transport settlements 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7647, and precedents like Ranjana Prakash (2011)14 SCC 639 2020 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1150. Ramu/Ramesh mentions 2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 196 2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 2014 are criminal, not corporate.

Key Takeaways:- Legal research demands multiple sources; one database rarely suffices.- Divisional Managers often litigate in consumer/motor accident arenas.- Persistence pays—further tools may surface the case.

Stay informed on Indian case law, and remember: This analysis is for educational purposes. For case-specific advice, consult a legal expert.

#LegalCaseSearch, #DivisionalManagerCase, #IndianCourtRecords