Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Definition and Nature: An equitable mortgage is a type of mortgage where the legal formalities of registration or execution may not be fully complied with, but the intention to create a mortgage is established through conduct or agreement. It often arises from implied or constructive acts, such as deposit of title deeds or agreement to mortgage, rather than formal registration. ["RATTARANHAMY v. APPUNAIDE et al."], ["PERERA v. ALVIS"]
Legal Recognition: Courts recognize equitable mortgages based on evidence of intention and conduct, even if the formal legal requirements are not met. For example, a mortgage of shares or undivided interest can be considered equitable if supported by conduct or agreement. ["MURUGAPPA CHETTY v. ALPISINGHO et al."], ["ABDUL HAMIDU v. PERERA"]
Priority and Rights: Equitable mortgages generally rank behind legal mortgages in priority unless specifically recognized or registered. When a mortgage is created prior to other encumbrances, it retains priority, but equitable mortgages may be subordinate to registered legal mortgages. ["GOONATILLEKE v. JAYASEKERA et al."], ["ANOHAMY et al. v. HANIFFA"]
Implications in Sale and Partition: When property is sold under a mortgage decree or in partition actions, equitable mortgages may or may not attach to the property depending on whether they were properly created and registered. Equitable mortgages of undivided shares or of interests during pendency of actions may be invalid or not binding on subsequent purchasers. ["PERERA v. ALVIS"], ["ELYATAMBY v. VALLIAMMAI"], ["DE SILVA v. ROSINAHAMY et al."]
Restrictions and Prohibitions: Certain statutes, such as Section 17 of the Partition Ordinance, prohibit mortgaging undivided shares during ongoing partition actions, affecting the validity of equitable mortgages during such periods. ["PERERA v. ALVIS"]
An equitable mortgage is essentially a non-legal, but recognized, form of mortgage created through conduct, agreement, or implication, rather than formal registration or execution. It grants the mortgagee rights over the mortgaged property based on the intention to secure a debt, even if the formalities are incomplete. Its enforceability and priority depend on compliance with legal requirements, such as registration, and the timing of creation relative to other encumbrances or legal proceedings. Courts tend to uphold equitable mortgages when supported by sufficient evidence of intent, but they are subordinate to registered legal mortgages and may be invalidated if created during prohibited periods, such as pendency of partition actions.
References:- ["ELYATAMBY v. VALLIAMMAI"]- ["GOONATILLEKE v. JAYASEKERA et al."]- ["ANOHAMY et al. v. HANIFFA"]- ["KRISTNAPPA CHETTY et al v. HORATALA"]- ["MURUGAPPA CHETTY v. ALPISINGHO et al."]- ["RATTARANHAMY v. APPUNAIDE et al."]- ["PERERA v. ALVIS"]- ["ABDUL HAMIDU v. PERERA"]
In the complex world of property financing in India, understanding different types of mortgages is crucial for borrowers, lenders, and investors. One such instrument that offers a simple yet effective way to secure loans is the equitable mortgage. But what exactly is an equitable mortgage, and how does it function within the Indian judiciary system? This comprehensive guide breaks down its essentials, drawing from the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TPA), and key judicial precedents.
Whether you're a homeowner seeking a loan or a financial institution evaluating security options, grasping the nuances of equitable mortgages can prevent costly legal pitfalls. Note that this article provides general information and is not a substitute for professional legal advice.
An equitable mortgage is a type of mortgage that arises when a borrower deposits their title deeds with a lender as security for a loan. This is distinct from a traditional mortgage where ownership is transferred to the lender. It is recognized under Section 58(f) of the TPA, 1882, and is created purely by the act of deposit with the intent to secure a debt. M. K. Ramesh Kumar VS Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, Rep. by its Manager - Andhra Pradesh
The essential requisites, as highlighted in judicial interpretations, include: (i) a debt, (ii) deposit of title deeds, and (iii) an intention that the deeds shall be security for the debt. UCO Bank VS State Bank of India and Others - 2012 Supreme(All) 33 In England and by extension in Indian law, an equitable mortgage can be created by actual deposit of title deeds, where parole evidence is admissible to show the meaning of the deposit and the extent of the security created. UCO Bank VS State Bank of India and Others - 2012 Supreme(All) 33
Unlike formal mortgages, no written deed is mandatory, making it a quick and cost-effective option for urban properties in notified towns.
Equitable mortgages come with several defining characteristics that set them apart:
These features make equitable mortgages popular for short-term loans, especially in commercial hubs like Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata, where such deposits are statutorily recognized.
Equitable mortgages carry significant enforceability under Indian law:
In practice, even if the lender loses possession of the title deeds post-deposit, the mortgage remains valid. As one court observed: If originals had been deposited and if mortgage had been created, fact that Bank lost possession of those documents subsequently, would not mean that mortgage itself is invalid. M. Lakshmi Narayana Choudhary VS Official Liquidator, High Court, MadrasM. Lakshmi Narayana Choudhary, Chennai VS Official Liquidator High Court, - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1823
This was affirmed in a case involving a bank where the deposit created a valid security despite subsequent document issues, emphasizing that the Recovery Officer's actions do not supersede a tribunal's mortgage decree. M. Lakshmi Narayana Choudhary VS Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras
Redemption is a core right under Section 60 of the TPA. Mortgagors can reclaim their property upon repayment. However, time limits apply:
In a notable second appeal, the court held that a suit filed in 2013 for a 1951 mortgage was barred by limitation, as 12 years under the old Act plus transitional periods exceeded allowances under the Limitation Act, 1963. The principle once a mortgage always a mortgage was invoked, but limitation prevailed. Nachiyappan VS Periyakaruppan
Another case clarified that mortgagors do not lose redemption rights due to a mortgagee's default on land revenue, provided the suit is within time. Nachiyappan VS Periyakaruppan
While versatile, equitable mortgages have caveats:
Additionally, intention remains pivotal. In disputes between banks, courts prioritize the first charge holder if intent to create security is clear, even without physical title deed deposit in some contexts under the SRFAESI Act. The deposit is not always a condition precedent. UCO Bank VS State Bank of India and Others - 2012 Supreme(All) 33
In agricultural tenancies, equitable doctrines like part-performance under Section 53A TPA cannot validate illegal permanent alienations barred by state laws, such as the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) Tenancy Act. Choudhari Palkaji VS Rukmini Devi - 2016 Supreme(AP) 594
Judicial precedents provide clarity:
These cases underscore that while equitable mortgages are robust, they hinge on proper intent, documentation, and timelines.
Equitable mortgages offer a streamlined security mechanism in India, governed primarily by the TPA, 1882. They enable quick loans via title deed deposits but demand careful adherence to redemption timelines, registration nuances, and enforcement rules. M. K. Ramesh Kumar VS Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, Rep. by its Manager - Andhra Pradesh
Key Takeaways:- Verify intent and deposit in notified towns.- Act within limitation periods to avoid barred claims.- Consult experts for fraud or complex enforcement.
For personalized guidance, reach out to a qualified lawyer. Stay informed to navigate India's property laws effectively.
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
#EquitableMortgage, #IndiaPropertyLaw, #MortgageGuide
Mortgage of an undivided share-Mortgagee not registering address and not making puisne incumbrancer a party to mortgage action- Subsequent action for partition-Mortgagee not entitled to a declaration that the share mortgaged is subject to the mortgage-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 643 ... -The second defendant did not register his mortgage bond and his address, and did not make the first defendant (to whom the land was....
whose mortgage is of a date subsequent to the prior mortgage. ... and his own mortgage. ... It seems equally certain that when such a mortgage is effected, the first mortgage is preferential to any subsequent mortgage after the mortgagor had acquired ownership. ... can hold it up as a shield against a puisne mortgagee whose mortgage is of a date subsequent to the pri....
mortgage decree ? ... -The plaintiffs did not buy the property subject to the mortgage- and are not 'bound by the mortgage decree.-. Where a person buys a mortgaged property after a mortgage; he should be either made a party or given notice of the mortgage action, if the mortgage decree is to bind him. ... The purchaser under mortgage decree is entitled to regard th....
on encumbrances P 5, and they claim that the mortgage No. 414 then became the primary mortgage. ... If the first purchaser is a purchaser under the primary mortgage, he is liable to be called upon to redeem the subsequent mortgage; but if the first purchaser is under the subsequent mortgage, he can be called upon to redeem the primary mortgage. ... There is a form of mortga....
Mortgage action-Mortgage of shares to be allotted in partition action-Lease pending action-Mortgage subject to lease-Ordinance No. 10 of 1863, ss. 12, 13, 17. ... The mortgage deed is prior in date and is registered. The lessee has notice of it. The mortgage document is not a mere agreement to mortgage. It is an effective mortgage. (Rajapakse v. Dassanayake [1 29....
Usufructuary mortgage-Agreement not to lease or mortgage-Subsequent mortgage-Bight of second mortgagee to discharge the previous mortgage-Authority. ... Thereafter he gave another usufructuary mortgage to the plaintiffs, who were authorized to retain a portion of the consideration for the discharge of the previous mortgage. ... The owner of certain property gave a usufructu....
It is the formal instrument legalizing a sale under a mortgage decree which declares the property to be bound and executable in satisfaction of the mortgage bond. The mortgage bond, I should have thought, was the root of the purchaser's title. ... Purchaser under mortgage decree-Registration, of mortgage bond enures to benefit of purchaser-Competition between purchaser and a lessee of the mortgagor-....
to mortgage shall, without a new deed of mortgage, warrant and make good to the mortgagor the said several part". ... this mortgage in the partition case and could have had the partition declared subject to the mortgage, the answer appears to be that he was under no legal obligation to set up the mortgage in the partition case. ... ], that in the case of a mortgage of the entire land, t....
It was contended that " any mortgage " included the mortgage of an undivided share. ... Partition action-Mortgage of land after decree for sale-Mortgage is invalid as against the purchaser under the, decree for sale. ... That may be so, but it is quite clear that the section refers to a mortgage effected prior to the commencement of the action, for section 17 expressly prohibits the mortgag....
I am unable to agree with this construction, for it seems to me that the use of the word " any " indicates the inclusion of every kind of mortgage, that is, whether the mortgage be of the entire land or of an undivided share of the land, and whether the mortgage be a primary or secondary mortgage, ... There is a distinction created between " a mortgage of the land " and " mortgage of ....
But the mortgage being a mode of transfer of property, it is subject to Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act and in the case of usufructuary mortgage, Section 62 of the Act and it is governed by the prescribed period of limitation for instituting a suit for recovery or redemption and foreclosure of a mortgage. A provision in a mortgage making it irredeemable is certainly antithetic to the principle of once a mortgage always a mortgage and nothing but a mortgage and hence redeem....
As per Section 103 of the Act, the mortgage is a usufructory mortgage but not a simple mortgage. After obtaining leave of the Court under Order VIII Rule 9 of C.P.C, the plaintiff filed a written statement denying material allegations and contended that the permission under Section 47 of the Act required and that the title derived by defendants 1 to 3 is only through Ganeshlal which is covered by Section 59 of Transfer of Property Act and that the suit is filed within 12 year....
(iii) that the acceptance by the bank, of the payment of Rs.30.00 Lakhs, in April 1997, was not on the basis of any undertaking by the Bank to discharge the property from mortgage or to discharge the company of its liabilities; (v) that the applicant appears to have bought another piece of undivided share in the land, with a view to construct a single module (flat) and he is now trying to take advantage by projecting some discrepancies. (iv) that the applicant cannot attack the creat....
(iii) that the acceptance by the bank, of the payment of Rs.30.00 Lakhs, in April 1997, was not on the basis of any undertaking by the Bank to discharge the property from mortgage or to discharge the company of its liabilities; (iv) that the applicant cannot attack the creation of equitable mortgage, on the ground that there are no original documents, since what is required for creating an equitable mortgage, is the deposit of documents evidencing the title of the property; and#HL_....
"Under this definition (referring to section 58 (f) of the Transfer of Property Act) the essential requisites of mortgage by deposit of title deeds are, (i) debt), (deposit of title deeds, and (iii) an intention that the deeds shall be security for the debt. In England and equitable mortgage can be created either, (1) by actual deposit of title deeds, in which case parole evidence is admis#31;sible to show the meaning of the de#31;posit and the extent of the security created, or (2) if there b....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
