Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Courts also scrutinize whether the application for leave is made in accordance with statutory rules and whether the applicant has provided sufficient grounds or documentation to justify the grant of leave ["27. Vithanage Seelani Perera No. 212 vs 1. Vithanage Kusumawathie Perera No. 492/A - Supreme Court"], ["MUNICIPAL COUNCIL COLOMBO v. LETCHIMAN CHETTIAR"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In estate planning and succession matters, questions often arise about procedural steps involving wills. A common query is: can a person file a leave application on the basis of a will? This typically refers to seeking court permission to continue or initiate proceedings related to a will, such as suits over estates or probate applications. Understanding this process is crucial for heirs, legatees, executors, and legal practitioners navigating probate courts.
This article explores the legal framework, drawing from key precedents and principles. While such applications are generally permissible as interlocutory steps, they must be properly framed to avoid pitfalls like limitation issues or misclassification as substantive claims. Note that this is general information and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
Leave applications to proceed with suits or proceedings based on a will are typically interlocutory or procedural in character. They do not seek substantive relief, such as adjudicating the will's validity, but rather permission to continue pending matters involving the estate. As clarified in legal documents, An application seeking leave to proceed, in respect of a pending suit or proceeding (filed before the order of winding up) is not an application for enforcement of any claim or right. It does not seek any ‘relief’ or ‘remedy’ with reference to any claim or right or obligation or liability. It is an application which is interlocutory in nature. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657
This distinction is vital. For instance, a legatee may file such an application when an executor dies before proving the will, converting a probate proceeding into one for letters of administration. In one case, a legatee successfully sought leave to proceed upon the executor's death, with the court holding that legatees are entitled to apply under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. IN THE GOODS OF SATIDAS MUKHERJEE ALIAS S. D. MUKHERJEE, DECD VS SUDIP MUKHERJEE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 645SUDIP MUKHERJEE VS STATE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 646
A key advantage is that these applications generally do not attract limitation periods. An application for leave to proceed with a pending suit or proceeding not being such an application for any relief, will not attract Article 137. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657
The right to apply accrues continuously while the suit remains stayed: The right to apply for leave accrues every moment the suit remains stayed. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657 This flexibility allows filing during the pendency of proceedings, provided procedural rules are followed.
However, if the application veers into substantive territory—like challenging the will's validity—it may fall under different limitation rules. Related precedents emphasize procedural compliance in estate matters. Kamla Devi VS Khushal Kanwar - 2007 2 Supreme 412S. Rathinam @ Kuppamuthu VS L. S. Mariappan - 2007 4 Supreme 397
To file effectively:- Identify the basis: Link it clearly to the will, such as estate interests or succession rights. For example, in testamentary cases, plaintiffs have sued based on undisclosed heirs or fraudulent probate filings, seeking to intervene via leave. 1. Thanippuli Achchige Seelawathie No. 127 vs Wijesekera Weerawickrema Wickremasinghe Mudiyanselage Dharmapala 188/8 - 2024 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 12856- Frame as procedural: Specify it's for permission to continue, not to prove the will. Courts have inherent powers to adapt proceedings post-events like an executor's death, prioritizing justice over technicalities. IN THE GOODS OF SATIDAS MUKHERJEE ALIAS S. D. MUKHERJEE, DECD VS SUDIP MUKHERJEE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 645- Timing: File while proceedings are stayed or pending. No fixed limitation applies to procedural leave in probate conversions. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657
In practice, this arises in scenarios like winding-up orders or caveats in probate. A non-party may need leave to intervene under CPC provisions, as a third party cannot challenge decrees without court permission. C. Venkatesan VS R. Natarajan - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1942
Several cases illustrate applications in will contexts:- Legatees' Rights Post-Executor Death: Where an executor dies unproved, legatees can seek leave for letters of administration. The legatees under a Will are entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration under Section 232 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. No limitation governs this. SUDIP MUKHERJEE VS STATE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 646- Probate Interventions: Courts allow substitution or continuation to avoid injustice, relying on precedents like Shambhu Prasad Agarwal v. Bhola Ram Agarwal. SUDIP MUKHERJEE VS STATE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 646- Third-Party Interventions: A non-party filing under Limitation Act Section 5 must obtain leave first; otherwise, it's not maintainable. C. Venkatesan VS R. Natarajan - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1942
Other contexts, like appeals or summary suits, reinforce that leave must disclose triable issues and comply with timelines, though not directly limitation-barred if procedural. AGANALL TRADERS LIMITED VS SHYAM AHUJA - 1998 Supreme(Del) 994VANDER POORTEN v. VANDER POORTEN et al.
Unrelated but cautionary examples include prison leave rules requiring good behavior, highlighting procedural rigor across domains. Noushad. A VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 227
Not all applications succeed:- Substantive Claims: If seeking will validity adjudication, limitation under Article 137 or specific probate rules may apply.- Procedural Non-Compliance: Late filing outside stay periods or improper framing leads to dismissal. For instance, non-speaking orders on leave appeals are unsustainable. State of Rajasthan VS Rajendra Prasad Jain - 2008 2 Supreme 133- Lack of Standing: Non-parties or those without estate interest may be barred without leave. C. Venkatesan VS R. Natarajan - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1942- Fraud or Nullity: Applications alleging prior fraud in testamentary actions need strong evidence. 1. Thanippuli Achchige Seelawathie No. 127 vs Wijesekera Weerawickrema Wickremasinghe Mudiyanselage Dharmapala 188/8 - 2024 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 12856
To maximize chances:1. Clearly Draft: State it's interlocutory for proceeding continuation, citing the will's role without challenging it. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 16572. Gather Evidence: Attach the will, proof of interest (e.g., as legatee), and pendency details.3. Seek Timely Filing: During stay or pendency to leverage accruing rights.4. Consult Precedents: Reference Succession Act Section 232 for executor-death scenarios. IN THE GOODS OF SATIDAS MUKHERJEE ALIAS S. D. MUKHERJEE, DECD VS SUDIP MUKHERJEE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 6455. Professional Help: Engage counsel to avoid misconstrual as substantive relief. Kamla Devi VS Khushal Kanwar - 2007 2 Supreme 412
Generally, yes—a person can file a leave application based on a will as a procedural, interlocutory step to continue estate proceedings, free from limitation periods if properly framed. This facilitates justice in probate and succession without technical hurdles, as seen in cases allowing legatee substitutions. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657SUDIP MUKHERJEE VS STATE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 646
Key Takeaways:- Interlocutory nature shields from limitations. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657- Flexible timing during pendency.- Distinguish from substantive will challenges.- Legatees have strong rights post-executor death. IN THE GOODS OF SATIDAS MUKHERJEE ALIAS S. D. MUKHERJEE, DECD VS SUDIP MUKHERJEE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 645
Always tailor to your jurisdiction and facts. This overview draws from established principles but professional advice is essential for real-world application.
References: COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KERALA VS BINANI ZINC LIMITED - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1657, Kamla Devi VS Khushal Kanwar - 2007 2 Supreme 412, S. Rathinam @ Kuppamuthu VS L. S. Mariappan - 2007 4 Supreme 397, IN THE GOODS OF SATIDAS MUKHERJEE ALIAS S. D. MUKHERJEE, DECD VS SUDIP MUKHERJEE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 645, SUDIP MUKHERJEE VS STATE - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 646, C. Venkatesan VS R. Natarajan - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1942, 1. Thanippuli Achchige Seelawathie No. 127 vs Wijesekera Weerawickrema Wickremasinghe Mudiyanselage Dharmapala 188/8 - 2024 Supreme(SRI)(SC) 12856
#ProbateLaw, #WillProceedings, #LegalGuide
Instead, when confronted by the defence filed by the Respondents and the issue of locus standi, the Applicant did not file the application for leave immediately. ... [11] No facts or circumstances prevented the filing of this application and no reasoning was afforded by the Applicant why this application was filed only 1 year 7 months after the Counterclaim was filed. C. ... [21] This application, as highlighted earlier, was only filed#HL....
However, till the leave is granted, it is a new application filed before the relevant Appellate Court. Thus, in the matter in hand, this leave to appeal application is a new application before this this Court until leave is granted to continue with the original appeal made. ... For example, if the deceased has nominated a person to be appointed as the legal representative in a memorandum filed, if a new person is ....
The plaintiff filed the instant action against the six defendants including the aforementioned three parties in the testamentary case, on the basis that Seelawathie fraudulently filed the testamentary action and obtained orders in her favour without disclosing the lawful heirs of ... an interest in the estate of the deceased person as entitles him in the opinion of the court to make such application. ... If the petitioner has no reason to suppose that his application will be opposed b....
Where a party has been wrongly named or described or where the judgment is a nullity owing to the fact that it was delivered against a person who is dead or a non-existing company- (However, present application does not relate to such circumstances occurred in the previous Leave to Appeal application ... Orders made per incuriam (Present application is not made on this basis stating that decision in SC SPL LA 218/2022 was made per incuriam) 2. ... In fact, this Leave ....
It is argued that the Court below has not considered the Special Leave Application in its real perspective. ... ... 3 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has strenuously argued before me that while dealing with the Special Leave Application the lower appellate Court has virtually allowed the appeal itself. ... As a rule, leave to appeal will not be refused to a person who might have been made ex nominee a party". ... The English practice is that "a person#HL_E....
An affidavit filed by a person who is not able to understand writing in the English language is liable to be rejected if the jurat is not in the form required by section 439 of the Civil Procedure Code. ... C. 283/1963-Application for Conditional Leave to Appeal to Her Majesty in Council under the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance. ... The petitioner did not dispute that he is a person who is not able to understand writing in the English language. ... In an application for con....
The petitioner sought leave to appeal against the said order, and leave was granted on the question 'whether an application to prove a last will should be dismissed when the petitioner is allowed to withdraw his application to obtain probate.' ... This is an application seeking leave of Court to appeal from the order dated 24th November 2005 made by the Additional District Judge of Colombo. ... Being aggrieved by this order the petitioner sought leave of this ....
Interestingly, thereafter, an application was filed by the wife of Nisham to implead her in the writ petition and raised an objection about the maintainability of the writ petition filed by the brother of the petitioner. Thus the convict himself preferred W.P.(Crl.) No.246 of 2023. ... The action is, no doubt, to create an impression that petitioner is not a well-behaved person and in turn to deny leave to him. The procedure adopted is illegal. ... It is also reported that though petitioner was granted....
- This is an application filed by the defendant on April 9, 1949, under Rule 2 in the Schedule to the Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance for leave to appeal to the Privy Council from a final judgment of this Court delivered on March 11, 1949. ... Quaere, whether notice of application for leave to appeal given to the opposite party by a duly appointed attorney of the applicant is valid. THIS was an application for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council....
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the a href="./.. ... The medical leave sanction has to be done as per proper procedure and several steps are laid down, i.e., after receipt of application at the administrative office, scrutiny of application and the medical certificate, sending the applicant to the Medical Board for second medical opinion, which the applicant ... Thereafter, she developed back pain and, therefore, extended leave on ....
Thus, the first question is answered by holding that a person who is not a party to the suit cannot question the correctness or otherwise of the decree passed therein without seeking leave of the Court. The second question is answered by holding that any such application filed by such person without seeking leave of the Court is not maintainable. Consequently, I find no merits in this Civil Revision Petition. If any such application is filed by such person without leave of the Court, whether such application is maintainable in law ? Whether the issue of su....
The basic reason for directing acquittal was that the prosecution has failed to prove the demand and acceptance of bribe and also that on the day the complainant claimed to have paid the bribe, no work was pending with the accused. The appellant State filed an application for grant of leave. To say the least the order is practicably unreasoned.
( 4 ) THE present application has been filed by one of the legatees under the will for leave to proceed with the said application upon conversion of this proceeding for grant of probate into a proceeding for grant of letters of administration.
( 4 ) THE present application has been filed by one of the legatees under the will for leave to proceed with the said application upon conversion of this proceeding for grant of probate into a proceeding for grant of letters of administration.
A reply to the leave to defendant application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Though it is mentioned in the preliminary objections that the leave to defend was not filed within the statutory period but this ground was not pressed during the course of the arguments. Therefore, I do not deem it necessary to adjudicate this aspect of the matter.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
