Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Replacement of IPC by BNS - The Indian Penal Code (IPC) was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which came into force on July 1, 2024. The BNS is a comprehensive new penal law intended to modernize and strengthen criminal justice, with provisions that continue to uphold rights and liabilities previously under IPC ["Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi vs Union of India, Through Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement - Bombay"] ["Abhishek Jain VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana"].
Transition and Applicability of Laws - For offences committed before July 1, 2024, the IPC remains applicable; FIRs registered after this date for prior offences are to be registered under IPC, but investigations proceed under BNS or BNSS. For offences registered on or after July 1, 2024, the BNS governs the proceedings, although the investigation may follow procedures under the previous laws ["Umesh Chandra Bansal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"] ["In Re: XXX VS State Of Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati"] ["Mahendra Singh And 6 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And Another - Allahabad"].
Legal Provisions & Repeal Clause - Section 358 of BNS explicitly states that the repeal of IPC does not affect rights, privileges, or liabilities accrued under IPC. The BNS also provides a 'saving clause' ensuring ongoing cases under IPC are not invalidated, and the investigation and trial procedures adapt accordingly ["Abhishek Jain VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana"] ["Ranjit Kumar Das @ Ranjeet Kumar Das vs State of Orissa - Orissa"] ["Arshdeep Singh alias Arsh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana"].
Jurisdiction & Trial - The BNS assigns different jurisdictions based on the offence type and severity. Some offences under BNS are triable by Magistrates, similar to IPC provisions, but with modifications. The courts have also clarified that proceedings initiated under IPC prior to BNS coming into force continue under the old law, while new offences post-July 2024 are under BNS ["Umesh Chandra Bansal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"] ["Deepu VS State of U. P. - Crimes"].
Special Provisions & Amendments - The BNS introduces new sections, such as Section 69, which has no IPC equivalent, and modifies procedures for filing FIRs, framing charges, and conducting investigations, emphasizing efficiency and clarity ["Umesh Chandra Bansal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"] ["Abhishek Jain VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC) from July 1, 2024, marking a significant legal overhaul. Cases prior to this date continue under IPC, but FIRs registered thereafter are governed by BNS, with provisions ensuring continuity and legal certainty. The law emphasizes that the repeal does not negate liabilities or rights under IPC, and courts are to interpret the new statutes in line with their plain and unambiguous language unless absurdity arises. This transition aims to modernize criminal jurisprudence while safeguarding existing legal rights ["Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi vs Union of India, Through Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement - Bombay"] ["Umesh Chandra Bansal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"].
In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian law, one of the most significant shifts occurred on July 1, 2024, when the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, was repealed and replaced by the modern Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. If you've been asking, give me IPC to BNS shortly, this guide breaks it down comprehensively. This transition modernizes criminal jurisprudence, decriminalizes outdated provisions, and ensures legal continuity. But what does it mean for ongoing cases, new offences, and practitioners? Let's dive in.
Note: This article provides general information based on legal provisions and case insights. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific cases.
The BNS, 2023, explicitly repeals the IPC through Section 358(1): The Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is hereby repealed. 14171~S.358 This marks the end of a 163-year-old statute rooted in British colonial rule, aiming to align criminal law with contemporary Indian values. Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi VS Union of India Through Assistant Director - Crimes (2025)
However, the repeal isn't abrupt. Section 358 includes robust savings clauses to preserve rights, liabilities, and proceedings:- Section 358(2) ensures that penalties, investigations, or remedies under the IPC continue unaffected.- Section 358(3) maintains ongoing proceedings as if the IPC were still in force, now governed by corresponding BNS provisions. 14171~S.358
This framework prevents legal vacuum, ensuring legal certainty and stability in criminal proceedings. 14171~Intro.
The BNS re-enacts nearly all IPC offences with new section numbers, updated terminology, and streamlined structure. Here are prominent examples:- IPC Section 302 (Murder) → BNS Section 103(1)Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi VS Union of India Through Assistant Director - Crimes (2025)- IPC Section 420 (Cheating) → BNS Section 318(4)Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi VS Union of India Through Assistant Director - Crimes (2025)- IPC Sections 405-409 (Criminal Breach of Trust) → BNS Section 316Anoop, S/o. Sreekumaran VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 1489- IPC Section 409 (Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant) aligns with BNS equivalents, requiring proof of entrustment and dishonest intention. Anandan R. , S/o. Raghavan S. VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 13
Section 420 of IPC is pari materia to Section 318(4) of BNS. Anandan R. , S/o. Raghavan S. VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 13 These mappings facilitate a seamless shift, but practitioners must update their references.
A critical aspect is the treatment of cases before July 1, 2024. Offences committed prior fall under IPC, but proceedings continue under BNS.
Admittedly, the provisions of IPC and Cr.P.C., are applicable to the offences that are committed prior to 01.07.2024, the date from which BNS and BNSS came into effect. Palivela Ravikumar vs The State of Telangana - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1832 Courts interpret this to avoid injustice.
For instance, a pending murder case under IPC 302 proceeds under BNS 103(1), without invalidation. 14171~S.358 Similarly, Section 358(2)(b) of BNS which expressly provides that repeal of IPC does not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability which has been acquired, accrued or incurred under IPC. XXXXXX VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1169
Post-repeal FIRs under IPC are problematic. In one ruling, an FIR under IPC Section 406 was quashed as an abuse of process since it was filed after repeal: The FIR was registered under a repealed statute, constituting an abuse of legal process. Jasmeet Kaur VS State of Punjab - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334 The court noted, once an act is repealed, it is treated as if it never existed. Jasmeet Kaur VS State of Punjab - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334
Recent judgments clarify ambiguities:- Pre-2024 Offences: Must use IPC for registration if BNS wasn't in effect. Palivela Ravikumar vs The State of Telangana - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1832- No Prima Facie Case: Charges like IPC 409/420 require clear entrustment and deception; absent these, proceedings may be quashed. Anandan R. , S/o. Raghavan S. VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 13- Marriage for 498A: Without legal marriage, IPC 498A (cruelty) doesn't apply, extending to BNS equivalents. Anoop, S/o. Sreekumaran VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 1489- Weapon and Intent: In a conviction modified from murder (IPC 302) to culpable homicide (IPC 304 Part II), the court stressed, a single blow with a blunt weapon does not necessarily imply intent to kill. Tushar Nath S/o. Sri Prafulla Nath vs State Of Assam - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 737
These cases underscore that transitional provisions demand careful application, preventing misuse.
Limitations include no disruption to vested rights, but courts vigilantly quash malafide proceedings. Jasmeet Kaur VS State of Punjab - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334
To navigate this shift:- Lawyers: Master BNS sections; reference Section 358 for transitions.- Courts: Apply savings clauses for pending matters.- Public: Stay informed via official gazettes; report post-2024 offences under BNS.- Businesses: Update compliance for offences like cheating (BNS 318).
Public awareness is key, as echoed in modernization efforts. 14171~Intro.
This overhaul promises a more just system. For tailored advice, reach out to legal experts. Stay updated as interpretations evolve.
References:1. Nagani Akram Mohammad Shafi VS Union of India Through Assistant Director - Crimes (2025): IPC to BNS section substitutions.2. 14171~S.358: Repeal and savings provisions.3. 14171~Intro.: BNS overview and modernization.4. Palivela Ravikumar vs The State of Telangana - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1832, XXXXXX VS State of U. T. Chandigarh - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1169, Jasmeet Kaur VS State of Punjab - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334, Anandan R. , S/o. Raghavan S. VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2025 Supreme(Ker) 13, Anoop, S/o. Sreekumaran VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 1489, Tushar Nath S/o. Sri Prafulla Nath vs State Of Assam - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 737: Case insights on transitions.
#IPCTOBNS, #BNS2023, #CriminalLawIndia
BNS , the new penal code which has replaced the IPC. The applicant has been in custody since 20th November 2024 in relation to this case.
It is further argued that any offence committed between the year 2018 and 30th June 2024 must be registered and tried under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and not the BNS. 7. ... The question for consideration before this Court is whether the petitioner should be charged under Sections 420 and 409 of the IPC, or if the matter is governed by Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS. 11. ... Since the complainant allegedly realized the non-return of funds only in 2025, the offence must be deemed to have occurre....
At that point in time, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) had not been introduced and, therefore, the offence, if any, ought to have been registered under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). ... Admittedly, the provisions of IPC and Cr.P.C., are applicable to the offences that are committed prior to 01.07.2024, the date from which BNS and BNSS came into effect. But for the simple reason that the offence is registered under BNS instead of IPC#HL_END....
BNS which expressly provides that repeal of IPC does not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability which has been acquired, accrued or incurred under IPC & Section 358 (2)(e) of a href="./.. ... It will give more teeth to deterrence, justice as also the process of justice. 8.1. BNS S , in terms of Section 1 (3) thereof, has come into force w.e.f. 01.07.2024 vide notification dated 23.02.2024. ... Section 358 of BNS reads as under:358. Repeal and savings.- (1) The #HL_STAR....
of illustration wherein such power could be exercised either to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice, though it may not be possible to lay down any precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelized and inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give ... Annexure-2 series, it is a case of failing to keep up a promise by the petitioner and not a false promise, hence, offence under Section 64(2)(m) BNS is not made out. ... As demonstrated hereinabove, the ingredients of the offence under Section 376(2)(n....
On 23.7.2024 the following order was passed: “The impugned FIR dated 3.7.2024 is registered under the provision of Indian Penal Code and not under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) which came into force on 1st July, 2024. ... Effect of Repeal of I.P.C. and Cr.P.C. and enforcement of new Criminal Laws (BNS and BNSS) was also considered by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of XXXX Vs. ... In the affidavit, it is mentioned that Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) came into force on ....
This interpretation draws further credence from perusal of Section 358(2)(b) of BNS which expressly provides that repeal of IPC does not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability which has been acquired, accrued or incurred under IPC & Section 358(2)(e) of BNS which expressly provides ... Secy. " Section 358 of BNS reads as under: 358. Repeal and savings.-(1) The Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is hereby repealed. ... that any proceeding or remedy under IPC#HL_EN....
Punishment for failure to give specified warning and nicotine and tar contents. ... Section 20 of COTP Act deals with punishment for failure to give specified warning and nicotine and tar contents. ... Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) by the petitioner, seeking quahment of the proceedings in Crime No.480 of 2025 pending on the file of P.S., Medipally, Rachakonda for the offences under Sections 274, 275 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Section 20 (2) Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products ... and it would fall w....
While filing the charge sheet, it is not filed for offences punishable under Section 111 (2) and 111(4) of BNS. ... During investigation, requisition has been filed to insert Sections 111(2) and 111(4) of BNS. 11. ... Accused No.4 is involved in Crime No.70/2017 of Shillong, Laitumkhrah Police Station registered for offences under Sections 120B, 419, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of Information and Technology Act. In the said case, charge sheet has been filed. ... The accused No.4 is also having criminal antece....
Chapter XX and Section 358 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS], reads as follows: CHAPTER XX REPEAL AND SAVINGS 358. Repeal and Savings (1) The Indian Penal Code is hereby repealed. ... A perusal of the above concludes that Indian Penal Code, 1860 eclipsed on the mid night of June 30, 2024, and the application of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 started to apply to all the incidents that have taken place w.e.f. 00:00:01 hours of July 01, 2024. 5. ... . by BNS and BNSS respectiv....
He has also highlighted the aspect that though as per the prosecution, the appellant had an axe, it is the case of the prosecution itself that the blunt side of the axe was used and under those circumstances the absence of either intention or knowledge becomes crucial. He has submitted that under no circumstances either intention or knowledge can be inferred and the accused be held to be culpable. He has also submitted that it is a case of only one blow and the assault was not repeated. The aspect that the deceased had passed away after 14 days of treatment in the hospital has also been high....
122. Voluntarily causing hurt or grievous hurt on provocation.- (1) Whoever voluntarily causes hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both. 334. Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation.—Whoever voluntarily causes hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to ....
15. Section 420 of IPC is pari materia to Section 318(4) of BNS. The essential ingredients to attract Section 420 of IPC are: (a) to deliver any property; or (b) to make, alter or destroy the whole or part of the valuable security or any thing which is signed or sealed and which is capable of being converted into a valuable property. 14. The gravamen of the offence under Section 409 of IPC is dishonest intention on the part of the accused but to establish the dishonest intention, it is not necessary that the prosecution should establish an intention to retain permanently....
9. Criminal breach of trust is defined under Section 405 of IPC and it has been provided as follows: 7. Another offence alleged to have been committed by the accused is under Section 406 of IPC, which provides that whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. 8. Sections 316 of BNS is corresponding to Sections 405 to 409 of IPC, which reads as under: 316: Criminal breach of trust.-(1) Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any ....
7. Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge.” (a) the previous operation of the Code so repealed or anything duly done or suffered thereunder; or (2) Notwithstanding the repeal of the Code referred to in subsection (1), it shall not affect: 6. Section 358 BNS, 2023, reads as under: Repeal of the Indian Penal Code:(1) The Indian Penal Code is hereby repealed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
