Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Legislative Procedure & Validity of Rules - The procedure for laying rules before the State Legislature under Section 28(3) was not always followed, rendering some notifications ultra vires and unconstitutional if not properly tabled. The Supreme Court emphasized that rules made by the government must be laid before the legislature to acquire validity, especially when the Rules replace local Acts or affect public money ["Shankar Lal Verma S/o Late Bukhan Lal Verma VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"].
Prospective Changes & Legislative Corrections - Amendments and corrections to legislation, such as those in finance bills or tariffs, are often made prospectively (e.g., effective from 1 February or 1 May 2025). Courts generally do not grant retrospective relief, respecting legislative domains and the principle that courts cannot compel retrospective legislative effect ["Aarti Drugs Limited vs Union of India, Notice to be served, through Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay"].
Parliamentary and State Legislative Powers - Parliament has exclusive and plenary legislative authority over certain subjects, including those in Union and Concurrent Lists. State legislatures have concurrent powers, but their laws can be overridden by Parliament if inconsistent, especially on matters of national importance or within the Union List ["KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF BIHAR . - Supreme Court"], ["MECON Indraprastha Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd. through its Secretary and Another v. State of U. P. through Principal Secretary Cooperative Development and Others - Allahabad"], ["Sri Sushil Kumar Singh vs Sri Gaurav Mehrotra - Allahabad"].
Legislative Authority & Ordinances - Ordinances promulgated by Governors or the President have the same force as Acts when the legislature is not in session or has not enacted a law. However, the legislature's failure to pass a Bill to replace an Ordinance can render the ordinance invalid ["Kodur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. No. R. 1523 and Others v. State of Kerala and Others - Kerala"].
State Legislatures & Special Provisions - In states with bicameral legislatures, Bills must pass both Houses and be assented to by the Governor. The legislative process and privileges, including immunity and proceedings, are protected under constitutional provisions, with courts generally barred from inquiring into legislative proceedings ["State of Punjab VS Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab - Supreme Court"], ["Hemant Soren, son of Shibu Soren VS Directorate of Enforcement - Jharkhand"].
Legislative Competence & Inconsistencies - Laws enacted by State legislatures can be challenged if they infringe on the Union List or are inconsistent with Parliament’s laws. In case of conflict, Parliament’s law prevails (Article 254). The competence of a State legislature is limited to its designated subjects, and any inconsistency with central laws can nullify state laws ["Sri Sushil Kumar Singh vs Sri Gaurav Mehrotra - Allahabad"].
Recent Legislative Changes Since 2025 - Major legislative amendments include corrections in financial legislation effective from early 2025, and procedural mandates for rules to be laid before legislatures. The Supreme Court continues to uphold the primacy of Parliament in legislative matters, especially on subjects like taxes, tariffs, and national security, while ensuring procedural compliance by state legislatures ["Aarti Drugs Limited vs Union of India, Notice to be served, through Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay"].
Analysis and Conclusion: Since 2025, the key legislative changes primarily involve procedural reforms, corrections to existing laws, and reaffirmation of parliamentary supremacy over state legislatures, especially concerning financial, tax, and national security laws. Courts have consistently maintained that legislative competence and procedural adherence are paramount, and any legislative amendments or corrections are to be prospective unless explicitly made retrospective. The legislative landscape remains governed by constitutional principles emphasizing the hierarchy of laws, the importance of proper procedure, and the limits of state legislative power in relation to Parliament.
Staying abreast of legislative developments is crucial for businesses, legal professionals, and citizens in India. Changes in laws by Parliament or state legislatures can impact everything from taxation and business operations to individual rights and regulatory compliance. A common query arises: What are the important legislative changes of Parliament and the A.P. State Legislature since 2025? This question is particularly relevant amid evolving economic and social landscapes. However, based on an in-depth review of available legal documents, the answer may surprise many—no significant changes are recorded post-2025. This blog post dives into the analysis, explores the implications, and provides context from related legal precedents to help you navigate this landscape.
Note: This article offers general information based on specified documents and is not legal advice. Consult qualified professionals for specific guidance.
The inquiry focuses on important legislative changes of Parliament and A.P. State Legislature since 2025. After scrutinizing key documents, the primary finding is clear: Since 2025, there have been no specific legislative changes introduced by Parliament or the Andhra Pradesh State Legislature. The materials do not record any amendments, enactments, or significant legislative acts after 2025.
This absence underscores the stability—or potential lull—in legislative activity within the scope of these records.
A close examination reveals that all cited materials predate or align with 2025. For instance, one reference discusses a news item from 18.03.2025 related to the Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1988, but it does not indicate any subsequent amendments or new laws after 2025. Vishnu Sunil Panthalam @ Vishnu Sunil, S/o Sunil Panthalam vs Kadakkal Temple Advisory Committee - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45891
Other documents, such as Union Of India: Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji VS Valluri Basavaiah Chowdhary: Union Of India - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 277, detail historical legislative developments and constitutional interpretations up to 1976, with no post-2025 updates. Similarly, New Delhi Municipal Council VS State Of Punjab - 1997 4 Supreme 90 covers historical legislative arrangements for regions like Delhi, stopping short of 2025 changes, and In Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 (1) VS . - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1686 analyzes laws and amendments up to 2025, including judicial decisions, without referencing later activity.
The lack of mentions suggests no significant shifts by Parliament or the Andhra Pradesh assembly in areas like preventive detention, sales tax, or executive powers post-2025—at least per these sources.
The absence of references to legislative amendments or enactments post-2025 in the provided documents suggests that the Indian Parliament and the Andhra Pradesh State Legislature have not undertaken any significant legislative changes since 2025, at least within the scope of these documents. This holds true across the reviewed materials, emphasizing reliance on official records for confirmation.
While no post-2025 changes appear, it's valuable to contextualize Parliament and state legislatures' roles. India's Constitution delineates powers via Article 246: Parliament holds exclusive authority over List I (Union List), both can legislate on List III (Concurrent List), and states on List II (State List). SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA VS COLLECTOR, KANPUR NAGAR - 2005 Supreme(All) 1004 Sub-Article (1) of article 246 (Article 246 (1)) of the Constitution states that the Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh schedule.
Related cases highlight dynamics:- Repugnancy and Central Supremacy: When Parliament and states overlap (Concurrent List), central laws prevail. In repugnancy disputes, Parliament and the State Legislature as decisive factor. As soon as assent is given by the President to the law passed by Parliament it becomes law. State of Kerala VS Mar Appraem Kuri Company Limited - 2007 Supreme(SC) 1755- Preventive Detention and Legislative Competence: Parliament retains authority on such matters, even if amendments are pending notification. Anil Baburao Baile vs Union of India - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 1056 The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 remains constitutionally valid, and legislative authority regarding preventive detention is upheld despite the non-notification of amendments.- State vs. Central Acts: For Andhra Pradesh-related matters, like sales tax, states may seek presidential assent for concurrent list items. Durga Rice and Baba Oil Mills Co. Nidubrole represented by its Partner G. Ankineedu v. State - 1964 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13 As the Civil Procedure Code was enacted by the Parliament and since the civil procedure is included in the concurrent list (list III), the State legislature must have thought it advisable to obtain the assent of the President...- NCTD and Services: Parliament can limit state-like executive powers, as in Delhi's governance. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi VS Union of India - 2023 Supreme(SC) 647 Law enacted by Parliament can limit executive power of NCTD over services.
These precedents illustrate ongoing tensions but no new 2025+ enactments. For example, challenges to acts like the Income Tax Act's Section 80IA amendments predate our timeframe. Katira Construction Ltd. VS Union of India - 2013 Supreme(Guj) 89
To bridge potential gaps:1. Consult official legislative records or government gazettes for post-2025 updates.2. Verify amendments via authoritative sources like the Ministry of Law and Justice or Andhra Pradesh Gazette.3. Track bills on parliament websites or apps like Sansad TV.4. Engage legal experts for tailored advice on concurrent list matters.
In summary, based solely on the analyzed documents, there have been no important legislative changes by Parliament or the Andhra Pradesh State Legislature since 2025. This stability offers predictability but warrants vigilance given India's dynamic legal environment. Key takeaways:- Rely on primary sources for accuracy.- Understand constitutional divisions to anticipate future changes.- No post-2025 shifts noted, but broader precedents affirm Parliament's overriding powers.
Stay informed, as legislatures can act swiftly via ordinances. For personalized insights, reach out to legal counsel.
References:- Vishnu Sunil Panthalam @ Vishnu Sunil, S/o Sunil Panthalam vs Kadakkal Temple Advisory Committee - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45891, Union Of India: Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji VS Valluri Basavaiah Chowdhary: Union Of India - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 277, New Delhi Municipal Council VS State Of Punjab - 1997 4 Supreme 90, In Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 (1) VS . - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1686, Durga Rice and Baba Oil Mills Co. Nidubrole represented by its Partner G. Ankineedu v. State - 1964 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi VS Union of India - 2023 Supreme(SC) 647, Anil Baburao Baile vs Union of India - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 1056, SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA VS COLLECTOR, KANPUR NAGAR - 2005 Supreme(All) 1004, State of Kerala VS Mar Appraem Kuri Company Limited - 2007 Supreme(SC) 1755, Katira Construction Ltd. VS Union of India - 2013 Supreme(Guj) 89
#IndianLegislation #Parliament2025 #APLegislature
procedure, before the State Legislature under Section 28(3) were not so laid. ... State of Gujarat and Another, AIR 1966 SC 385 in which their Lordships of the Supreme Court have clearly held that since the Act under which the Rules are framed does not prescribe that the Rules will acquire validity from the date of tabling the Rules before the Legislature ... replaces local Acts or provisional orders and most important of all, where the spending, etc. of public money is affected.” ... ....
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner points out that the errors have now been corrected; however, such corrections/changes are to take effect from either 1 February 2025 or 1 May 2025. ... On the Petitioner’s own showing, certain changes were brought about in the finance bill from 1 May 2025 or, in terms of the notification dated 1 February 2025, effective from 1 February 2025, by which such so-called errors stand rectified. ... The circumstance that the l....
A temporary Act is a law which is enacted by the legislature – Parliament or the state legislature – in exercise of its plenary powers. ... State Legislature. ... Even if an Ordinance hypothetically could provide for such a savings clause, the State Legislature may not accept it, since a Bill introduced by 18 the government of the day is the property of the State Legislature ... It ....
As the Civil Procedure Code was enacted by the Parliament and since the civil procedure is included in the concurrent list (list III), the State legislature must have thought it advisable to obtain the assent of the President in regard to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. ... 31. ... It was directly within the competence of the State legislature and it is too much to contend that the legislature had resorted to the device of clothing the legislation in a for....
Since in view of Article 239-AA(3)(b), Parliament also has legislative power over Entry 41 of List II, a corresponding issue on the extent of executive power of the Union of India and the Government of NCTD on matters over which both Parliament and the legislative assembly of NCTD have the power to enact ... The proviso to Article 162 states that on matters over which both the state legislature and Parliament can make laws, the executive power of Sta....
Since Section 3 of the Constitution Amendment Act remains to be notified, the Parliament does not have legislative power to make any law relating to preventive detention, as contemplated under Article 22 of the Constitution. ... Ambedkar is concerned, acting in public interest, the Constituent Assembly made provision in Entry-9 of List-I and Entry-3 of List-III authorizing the Parliament and the State Legislature by Article 246 to pass laws of preventive detention. ... Owing to the p....
State Legislature. ... or by a State Legislature set up by the Constitution. ... It was contended for the petitioner that the Act was void and was a still-born legislation by reason of the Pondicherry Legislature having abdicated its legislative functions in favour of the Madras State Legislature. ... There being no legislative assembly set up for Chandigarh, Parliament and Parliament 568 alone ha....
Since the RTI Act falls within the purview of the residuary legislative power of Parliament, it was not open to the state legislature to provide, by means of S.113 (2), that all cooperative societies within the State would be governed by the RTI Act enacted by Parliament; and ... (iv) The Office Memorandum ... This is beyond the legislative competence of the state legislature. ... Though, the legislation may be vo....
The imposition by S.3 of the Act is under the legislative authority of Parliament itself and not under the authority of any State Legislature as expressed in any State Act What S.3 does is to adopt by reference the provisions of the State Act and all the notifications, orders and rules made thereunder ... No. 27 of 1961, D/-31-8-1961 (MP) that the cess on sugarcane as imposed by the terms of S.23 of we local Act was beyond the legislative competence of the S....
or a State Legislature. ... having abdicated its legislative functions in Parliament and Parliament alone has any legislative power practice also, such successive changes have been allowed to In 1985 the Legislature of the State of Punjab enacted p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding
Hence, the essential legislative function continues to be in the hands of both the Parliament, and the State legislature. Therefore, the House continues to have the power to re-write the rules.
Parliament and the State legislature both have legislative powers to make laws with respect to any matter enumerated in List III, or Concurrent List. Similarly, State legislature has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II. Board of Management, Dayanand College of Law and Others [(2007) 2 SCC 202], the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the Bar Council of India is concerned with the legal education in the country, but it does not directly control the same.
The central question is, whether in the present case, the explanation below Sub-Section (13) to Section 80IA introduced by the Finance Act No. 2 of 2009 with effect from 1.4.2000 transgresses the legislative competence of the Parliament. These, in the nutshell, are the relevant legislative changes brought about by the Parliament from time to time.
Parliament and the State Legislature as decisive factor. As soon as assent is given by the President to the law passed by Parliament it becomes law. Commencement of the Act is distinct from making the law. The verb 'made' in Article 254 brings out the constitutional emanation that it is the making of the law by the respective constituent legislatures, namely.
Sub-Article (1) of article 246 (Article 246 (1)) of the Constitution states that the Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh schedule. Sub-Article (2) of Article 246 (Article 246 (2)) enables the Parliament as well as the State legislature to make laws in respect to the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule. I of this part is legislative relations and deals with distribution of legislative power between the Parliament and the State legislature.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
