Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Role of Bank in Claim Settlement - Banks act as intermediaries for premium collection and data transmission under PMFBY, not as insurers themselves. They are responsible for deducting premiums from farmers' accounts and forwarding the data to insurance companies. However, they are not liable for claim rejection unless they fail to provide correct information or violate operational guidelines ["BRANCH MANAGER JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT BRANCH BHAISDEHI vs RAMU PAL S/O BUDDHU PAL & OTHERS - Consumer National"] ["Punjab National Bank, Ramanathapuram Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager VS Chairman / District Judge, Permanent Lok Adalat, District Court Campus, Ramanathapuram - Madras"].
Insurance Claim Eligibility and Process - Farmers are entitled to claim compensation based on the scheme's formula, provided they have paid premiums and the claim is supported by proper documentation and adherence to operational guidelines. Claims are processed by insurance companies, and claims rejection often involves issues with data accuracy or procedural compliance ["BRANCH MANAGER JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT BRANCH BHAISDEHI vs RAMU PAL S/O BUDDHU PAL & OTHERS - Consumer National"] ["SBI Gen.Ins.Co.Ltd vs Chaudhary Ragnathbhai Jivrajbhai - Consumer State"] ["SBI Gen.Ins.Co.Ltd vs Chudhary Jagmal Rugnathbhai - Consumer State"].
Court and Authority Judgments - The courts (including High Courts and the Supreme Court) have emphasized that claims should be settled according to scheme guidelines, and that banks are not insurers but facilitators. When claims are rejected, farmers or claimants must approach insurance companies or relevant authorities; courts generally do not require judicial judgments for claim approval but may intervene if procedural violations or scheme misapplications are evident ["BRANCH MANAGER JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT BRANCH BHAISDEHI vs RAMU PAL S/O BUDDHU PAL & OTHERS - Consumer National"] ["PANCHAVARNAM.S Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER - Madras"].
Specific Case Insights - In cases where crop damage or loss occurs due to unforeseen events, farmers must submit valid claims supported by scheme protocols. Rejections often cite procedural lapses, incorrect data, or non-compliance with operational guidelines. Farmers are advised to approach insurance companies directly or seek intervention through courts if procedural issues are evident, but courts do not typically require judgments from higher courts like the Supreme Court for claim realization ["BRANCH MANAGER JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT BRANCH BHAISDEHI vs RAMU PAL S/O BUDDHU PAL & OTHERS - Consumer National"] ["PANCHAVARNAM.S Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) stipulates that insurance claims should primarily be settled by the insurance companies based on adherence to operational guidelines. Banks act as intermediaries in premium collection and data transmission, not as insurers or claim adjudicators. Therefore, farmers should file claims directly with insurance companies, and if claims are rejected due to procedural or data issues, farmers can seek redress through the insurance company's grievance process or courts. However, courts generally do not require judgments from the High Court or Supreme Court specifically for claim approval; instead, they ensure procedural compliance and adherence to scheme guidelines. Ultimately, claim settlement involves insurance companies, with courts intervening only if procedural violations occur ["BRANCH MANAGER JILA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT BRANCH BHAISDEHI vs RAMU PAL S/O BUDDHU PAL & OTHERS - Consumer National"] ["PANCHAVARNAM.S Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER - Madras"].
Farming in India is fraught with risks, especially from unpredictable weather and crop failures. The Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) was launched to provide financial relief to farmers through crop insurance. However, many farmers face delays or denials in claims, leading to a common question: Pradhanmantri fasal bima Yojana me kisaan ko claim milna chahiye bank ya insurance company ke dwara? (In PMFBY, should the farmer get the claim from the bank or the insurance company?) And crucially, what do High Court or Supreme Court judgments say?
This blog post dives into key court rulings, explaining eligibility criteria, data responsibilities, and the roles of banks versus insurers. While courts generally emphasize verified data and procedural fairness, outcomes depend on specific facts. Note: This is general information based on judgments and not personalized legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.
PMFBY is a government-backed crop insurance scheme covering yield losses due to natural calamities, pests, or diseases. Farmers pay a nominal premium (subsidized by the government), and premiums are often auto-debited from bank loans. Claims are assessed using actual yield data compared to threshold yields. But disputes arise over data errors, delays, or rejections—prompting judicial intervention.
Courts have clarified that claims aren't automatic; they hinge on actual yield data from government departments like Economics & Statistics, Agriculture, and Revenue. Mere declarations of loss aren't enough. Let's explore pivotal High Court judgments.
High Courts have upheld authorities' decisions when based on accurate data and procedures, while holding parties accountable for errors. Here's a breakdown:
Courts stress that compensation eligibility under PMFBY depends on actual yield data and thresholds, not just farmer claims. In one case involving Keezhaputhanur village, the court dismissed a mandamus petition, noting: the actual yield data provided by the Department of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Department of Revenue, and Insurance company officials determined the eligibility for compensation. P. Manimaran VS District Collector, Nagapattinam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 821
The absence of mala fides and procedural adherence was key: decisions are upheld unless proven arbitrary. Farmers challenging without evidence of bad faith typically fail. P. Manimaran VS District Collector, Nagapattinam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 821
A critical ruling assigns blame for data errors to the Nodal Bank. In a dispute over incorrect village names leading to lower payouts, the court held the Nodal Bank responsible for data entry and submission. It directed payment of the correct amount after rectification, stating errors like clerical mistakes must be fixed by authorities. Claimants are entitled to compensation on corrected data. New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173
This implies banks (as Nodal Officers) bear primary responsibility for accurate data upload, while insurers process based on that data.
Public Interest Litigations (PILs) are viable even with individual grievance portals. Courts recognize collective farmer rights: the significance of conducting a comprehensive exercise to address farmers' claims outweighed insurer objections. Individual claims don't bar PILs for broader failures. Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187
Judgments don't create a strict bank or insurer binary but delineate roles:- Nodal Banks: Handle premium deduction, data submission (crop, village details), and often disburse claims via loan accounts. Liable for data inaccuracies. New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173- Insurance Companies: Assess claims using submitted data, calculate payouts per PMFBY formulas. Can't reject arbitrarily if data supports. Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187
In practice, claims flow from insurer to bank to farmer. But courts direct whichever entity erred to rectify. For instance, if premium delays occur but insurers accept proposals, rejections are unjustified. In a Madras High Court case, petitioners' claims were allowed despite bank debiting premiums post-cutoff (30.12.2016), as remitted within limits and accepted by insurer. The District Collector recommended settlement, overriding delay objections. V.PANNEERSELVAM vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 300
Another ruling directed error rectification in a 2017-18 claim application, ensuring no prejudice from administrative slips. PANCHAVARNAM.S Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER
Key Principle: Insurers can't reject if they've accepted premiums/proposals, emphasizing utmost good faith (uberrima fides). Related consumer cases reinforce this, though not PMFBY-specific. L.I.C. Of India vs Shiv Prasad, Kamta Prasad, Kishan Kumar
Rejections often cite:- Insufficient yield data proof.- Data mismatches (e.g., wrong village). New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173- Delayed premiums—but invalid if accepted. V.PANNEERSELVAM vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 300
Courts remedy via:- Mandating data verification.- Directing payouts on corrected info.- Upholding PILs for mass claims. Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187
Exceptions: Petitions fail without mala fides evidence. Authorities' data-based calls stand. P. Manimaran VS District Collector, Nagapattinam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 821
While core PMFBY cases focus on yield/data, parallel disputes highlight scheme mechanics:- In loan-linked insurance, only settled claims (e.g., 802/2143) underscore verification needs. Banks/insurers must ensure coverage. Rajendra Prasad Singh vs THE UNION OF INDIA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 10889- Supreme Court echoes PMFBY formulas binding compensation. HDFC ARGO GIC.LTD. vs RAJENDRA JAIN - 2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 21554
These reinforce: timely, accurate processes protect farmers.
To secure claims:- Verify bank-submitted data (crop, area, village) promptly.- Use grievance portals, escalate to District Collectors.- File representations for rectifications—courts favor these. PANCHAVARNAM.S Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER- Pursue PILs for widespread issues.- Retain yield proofs, photos.
Authorities' Duties:- Nodal Banks: Robust data checks. New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173- Insurers: Prompt settlements per formulas. Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187
High Court judgments under PMFBY prioritize actual yield data for eligibility, with Nodal Banks accountable for accuracy and insurers for fair processing. Claims typically route via banks, but liability follows fault. Farmers succeed by proving errors or systemic lapses, as seen in rulings directing corrections and payouts. P. Manimaran VS District Collector, Nagapattinam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 821New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187
Takeaways:- Eligibility: Yield data > declarations. P. Manimaran VS District Collector, Nagapattinam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 821- Data errors: Bank's duty to fix. New India Assurance Company Ltd. VS S. Sumathy - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2173- PILs viable for groups. Patel Jayantibhai Prabhubhai vs The Manager - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1187- Premium acceptance binds insurer. V.PANNEERSELVAM vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 300
Stay informed, act swiftly, and seek professional advice. PMFBY aims to safeguard livelihoods—courts ensure it delivers.
Disclaimer: Judgments are case-specific; outcomes vary. This analysis draws from referenced documents for informational purposes only.
#PMFBY, #CropInsurance, #FarmerRights
The issue pertains to insurance claims under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana ( PMFBY) issued by Government of India, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare. Agriculture National Insurance Company was selected as insurer( Implementing Agency) under the PMFBY. ... District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Betul was the nodal bank under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana in qu....
Bima Yojana-crop insurance scheme (PMFBY).] ... The writ petitioner is a banking company. The second respondent is an agriculturist. He availed loan from the petitioner bank in the year 2016. The loan was to be repaid within five years. He had already enrolled himself under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana-Crop Insurance (PMFBY). ... Mantri Fasal Bima Yajana during Kharif 2016 season – Notific....
The great principle of insurance law is that a contract of insurance is based upon utmost good faith Uberrima fides , in fact it is the fundamental basis upon which all contracts of insurance are made. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of P.C. ... The said bank had deducted Rs 330.00 from the said account in the head of insurance premium under “Pradhanmantri Jivan Jyoti Bima Yojna” and the life of late Ichha Ram Soni was ins....
How to apply for Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana? You can download the form from the official website or by contacting an affiliated bank or insurance company. ... It was alleged by the opposite parties that Rs.12/- was debited towards Premium for 'Pradhanmantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY)'. ... In this case before deducting the amount of the complainant in the 'Pradhanmantri Suraksha Bima #HL_....
, cannot be sustained as the same runs contrary to the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. ... Company. ... We have considered the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and we find ourselves in complete agreement with it as we find that the compensation amount is payable in accordance with the formula fixed in the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. ... HDFC Ergo Agriculture Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Manager, HDFC General ....
Brief facts of the present case are as under: Complainant was having crop insurance under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana and due to flood crop was damaged and for compensation complainant claimed before the insurance company but the same was rejected. ... Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). below is relevant provision of operational guidelines of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna vide clause XI: Asses....
Brief facts of the present case are as under: Complainant was having crop insurance under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana and due to flood crop was damaged and for compensation complainant claimed before the insurance company but the same was rejected. ... Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). below is relevant provision of operational guidelines of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna vide clause XI: Asses....
It is the case of the petitioner that she has submitted an application for crop insurance under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana Scheme for the year 2017-18. ... to the petitioner for the year 2017-2018 under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana Scheme by considering the representation dated 16.02.2022 made by the petitioner. ... No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the representation seeking for rectification of the error in her earli....
the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). ... It is stated that in the year 2016, 20143 farmers took loans from the Punjab National Bank, Rahatpur Branch, Begusarai and the loans were insured with the 4th Respondent-Insurance Company. However, out of 2143 claims made, only 802 were disbursed the compensation. ... , it would have the character of a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, as has been laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court#HL_E....
ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the rejection of the petitioners' crop insurance claim under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. ... 7.This Court considered the rival submissions made and perused the materials placed on record. 8.The petitioner are agriculturists. They have availed agricultural loan under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana [PMFBY] and also subscribed to the crop insurance scheme. ... They availed a....
(3) fairm ke sambandh may “nideshak” say abhipret hai (aur esmay shamil hai) fairm ka bhagidar. Parantoo nyayalay ke faisley me abhilikhit kiye jane saknay wale virodh aur paryapat pratikool karan nahi rahne par, aisa karavas teen mahine se kam ka aur jurmana 1000 rupayee se kam ka nahi hoga. Spastikaran (1) Yadi es adhiniyam ya eske adhin banaye gaye niyamo ya oopniyamo ka ullaghan karne wala vyakti koi kampani ho to kampani ke nirdeshak, prabhandak ya sachiv sahit kampany ya fairm ka prabhari ya kampani ya fairm ke sanchlan ke liye uttardayee harek vyakti es ullaghan ka doshi hog....
(B) SHRESTHTA KE MAPDAND KE ADHAR PAR CHAYAN ME ADHIKARIO KE SAMPURAN sewakal Kl PRAVISTHIO DEKHIJAYE PARANTU VISHESH DHYAN ANTIM. 10 VARSO KE pravisthio PAR DIYAJAYE. (C) ADHIKARIO KEcharitra PANJIYO KE PRAVISTHIO KE ADHAR PAR MULYAKAN karne HETU UNHE NIMN TEN SRENIYO ME VIBHAJIT KIYA JAYE: (1) ATIUTTAM (2) UTTAM (3) ANUPYUKT. ATAH PATRETA CHETRA KE SAMAST ADHIKARIO KA MULYAKAN kar UNKI APSI TULNATAMAK PARASPARIK SHRESTHTA KE VISAY ME NIRNAYA LIYA jana CHAHIYE. SHRESTHTA KE MAPDAND KE ANUSAAR CHAYAN KA TATPARYA YAH KAI Kl sumpuran PATRATA CHETRA ME SE SARVOTTAM UPLABDHA AD....
"yadi koi aisa prashna uthe ki prabandhatantra ke sadasya ya padadhikari ke roop men koi vyaktt samyak roop se chuna gaya hai ya nahin athava uska sadasya ya padadhikari hone ka hakdar hai ya nahin ya prabandhtantra baidhroop se gathitha hat ya nahin to kulapati ka vinishchaya antim hoga. "
ANUBHAV:-PRADHANADHYAPAK KE CHAYAN KE LIYE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL KE PRADHNAADHYAPAK KE RUP ME YA HIGH SCHOOL/intermediate COLLEGE ME SAHAYAK ADHYAPAK KE RUP ME KI GAYI SEWA AUR INTER COLLEGE PRADHANACHARYA KE LIYE KISI HIGH SCHOOL KE PRADHANADHAYAPAK YA PRAWAKTA KE RUP ME KI GAYI SEWA KA KUM SE KUM CHAR VARASH KA ANUBHAV AWASHYAK HOGA.
1DHAN SHAKTI YA JANSHAKTI SE PAHALE WALE KISEE YANTRIK SADHAN SE HAIN AUR ISME URAYUKTH BHEE SAMILIT HAIN KINTU ISMDE YASE YANTRIK SADHAN JISKE INJINE KEE SHAMTA 3 HORSE POWER TAK HO SAMLET NAHIN HONGE." 'AARA MILL' KA TAPTARYA IMARATI LAKARI AUR ANYS LAKAR1 KO KATANE, CHEERANE YA USE TUKARAUN ME PARIWARTIT KARNE YA TATSADRAYSA KARYAUN KO PRAYOJANARTHY VIDYUT. However;, the amended Rule has been produced by the Standing counsel dated 26th June 1.998 where the definition of Section 2 (a), which was amended, reads as under:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
