Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
When a respondent dies during proceedings, it is the responsibility of the party or their legal representatives to initiate the process of substitution, failing which the case may abate or proceed without the deceased respondent's heirs ["Govind Laxman Jadhav VS Namdeo Balu Jadhav - Bombay"], ["Bhag Singh VS Collector Land Acquisition Hppwd Mandi - Current Civil Cases"], ["Kizhiakalathil Puthan Veetil Thavazhi Karnavan VS Manikat Variath Ukkali Varissiars son Sankunni - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the fast-paced world of civil litigation, unexpected events like the death of a party can disrupt proceedings. Imagine a scenario where a respondent passes away mid-case: if a respondent expires during the pendency of the suit, whose responsibility is it to take the legal representatives (LRs) on record? This question arises frequently in Indian courts, governed primarily by Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). Understanding this is crucial to avoid abatement of the suit or appeal, which could derail your case.
This article breaks down the legal principles, responsibilities, exceptions, and practical tips, drawing from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
When a respondent dies while a suit or appeal is pending, the proceedings do not automatically halt forever. However, the legal heirs or LRs must be substituted to continue the case against them. Failure to do so within the statutory period—typically 90 days from the date of death—leads to abatement of the suit or appeal against the deceased respondent. Abatement means the case effectively ends as against that party, potentially dismissing the entire matter if they are essential.
As established in key rulings, the failure to substitute legal heirs within the prescribed period leads to abatement of the suit or appeal against the deceased respondent Union Of India VS Shree Ram Bohra - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 18. This underscores the time-sensitive nature of the process.
The primary duty falls on the legal heirs or legal representatives of the deceased respondent themselves. It is not the court's obligation, nor typically the opposing party's (like the plaintiff or appellant), to initiate substitution unless specified otherwise.
This duty extends to counsel: under Order 22 Rule 10A CPC, pleaders must inform the court of a party's death promptly Ida Fernandes VS Cecilia Fernandes - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1691. Duty of pleader to communicate to Court death of a party Ida Fernandes VS Cecilia Fernandes - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1691.
Courts play a facilitative role. Upon application, they verify LRs and substitute them. If filed timely, even court delays won't cause abatement Union Of India VS Shree Ram Bohra - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 18.
However, abatement occurs automatically if no application is made in time Gurnam Singh(D) Thr. Lrs. VS Gurbachan Kaur(D) By Lrs. - 2017 4 Supreme 549. Courts may condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, if there's sufficient cause, prioritizing substantial justice Katari Suryanarayana VS Koppisetti Subba Rao - 2009 3 Supreme 385.
The court may exercise its discretion to condone delay, but this is not automatic and depends on the facts and circumstances of each case Katari Suryanarayana VS Koppisetti Subba Rao - 2009 3 Supreme 385. Factors include bona fides, awareness of death, and prompt action post-knowledge Pramod Jamwal VS Bank of Maharashtra, Nagpur - 2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 468.
Judicial interpretations vary by context, providing broader insights:
In land reference cases under the Land Acquisition Act, if a claimant dies post-notice, it is duty of the legal representatives of deceased claimant to come on record Bhag Singh VS Collector Land Acquisition Hppwd Mandi - 2018 Supreme(HP) 1447. The court directed: the legal representatives of the deceased land owner should have been permitted to be taken on record Bhag Singh VS Collector Land Acquisition Hppwd Mandi - 2018 Supreme(HP) 1447,
echoing CPC principles even in statutory proceedings.
Order 22 CPC doesn't strictly apply to writs, but substitution must occur within a reasonable time, guided by Limitation Act Article 120 (90 days) Ganpat VS Mangla Ram - 2009 Supreme(Raj) 191Ganpat VS Mangla Ram - 2009 Supreme(Raj) 188. Article 120 of Limitation Act can be used as a guideline... Limitation Act prescribes ninety days Ganpat VS Mangla Ram - 2009 Supreme(Raj) 191. Delays of five years were rejected as unreasonable.
In appeals, failure to bring all known LRs can lead to abatement unless the estate is sufficiently represented Rukminibai Motiram Kshirsagar (Deceased) Through Its Legal Heir Sumanbai Namdeo Kshirsagar VS Manoramabai Mallikarjun Bagale (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs Shobha Raosaheb Bagale - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1649. All known legal heirs must be brought on record Rukminibai Motiram Kshirsagar (Deceased) Through Its Legal Heir Sumanbai Namdeo Kshirsagar VS Manoramabai Mallikarjun Bagale (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs Shobha Raosaheb Bagale - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1649; once notified of omissions, parties must act.
Even generational tenancies require proper LR substitution. Courts insist on including all heirs post-death to avoid abatement Rukminibai Motiram Kshirsagar (Deceased) Through Its Legal Heir Sumanbai Namdeo Kshirsagar VS Manoramabai Mallikarjun Bagale (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs Shobha Raosaheb Bagale - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1649.
In revenue suits, if a party dies without LRs on record, judgments against the dead are a nullity: a party to lis if expires, then the lis comes to an end... only when the deceased legal representatives are brought on record Sal Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 2015 Supreme(Raj) 485.
These cases illustrate: while heirs bear the main onus, contexts like writs use reasonable time flexibly, but diligence is key.
To safeguard your case:- Monitor party status: Parties and counsel should track deaths via notices or records.- File promptly: Within 90 days; include all LRs with affidavits.- Document delays: Seek condonation with strong reasons (e.g., lack of knowledge).- Communicate: Inform court and opposite party immediately Ram Sumiran VS D. D. C - 1984 0 Supreme(SC) 365.- In appeals/writs: Act within reasonable time, ideally 90 days.
Legal heirs or representatives should be vigilant and act promptly upon the death of a respondent to file applications for substitution within the statutory period.
Navigating party deaths requires vigilance. Early action prevents costly abatements, ensuring justice prevails. For tailored guidance, reach out to a civil litigation expert.
References include judgments like Pramod Jamwal VS Bank of Maharashtra, Nagpur - 2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 468, BANWARI LAL VS BALBIR SINGH - 2015 0 Supreme(SC) 829, Union Of India VS Shree Ram Bohra - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 18, and others cited inline.
#SuitAbatement #LRSubstitution #Order22CPC
He submitted that merely because the legal representatives of the original defendant No. 2 did not take steps for bringing their names on record, the case of the respondent on merits cannot be allowed to be defeated. ... the decree passed by the trial Court was illegal, relief could have been granted in favour of the defendant whose legal representatives are not brought on record. ... There were nine original plaintiffs who filed second appeal before....
legal representatives come in. ... During the pendency of the appeal the 15th defendant died and his legal representative came on the record as 20th respondent. He supported the appellant and impugned the kanom granted by the 15th defendant to the 2nd defendant. ... The present case affords an excellent illustration where two successive legal representatives of a party (first plaintiff) have sought to take up positions directly contradictory to that of their predecessor-in-law. If that is allowed who ca....
In case the claimant expires after receiving the notice in reference petition from the Court, then certainly it is duty of the legal representatives of deceased claimant to come on record within reasonable period to continue the proceedings of reference petition and in such a situation, provisions of ... In case, claimant/land owners expires during pendency of land reference made under Section 18 of the Act, provisions of Order 22 CPC for bringing his legal representatives on record in....
In case, claimant/land owners expires during pendency of land reference made under Section 18 of the Act, provisions of Order 22 CPC for bringing his legal representatives on record in such proceeding may be invoked and Court should follow procedure to deal with situation as provided in Khewa Ram''s ... In case the claimant expires after receiving the notice in reference petition from the Court, then certainly it is duty of the legal representatives of deceased claimant to come on record#HL_EN....
Lack of diligence or negligence can be attributed to an appellant only when he is aware of the death and fails to take steps to bring the legal representatives on record. ... Where the appellant being unaware of the death of respondent, does not take steps to bring the legal representatives on record, there can be no question of any want of diligence or negligence. 15. In this case, the appeal was not being listed periodically by the High Court. ... From the #HL_START....
On behalf of the appellant it has been urged that as the decision of the first appeal in the High Court was anticipated to take a long time the record was consigned to the Record Room. The argument has not impressed me well. ... The act of consigning the record to the Record Room was not an act of prudence and as such it cannot be availed of for the condonation of delay in bringing the legal representatives of the since deceased respondent on the record#HL_E....
10 It has been brought to my attention that Respondent No.3 to Chamber Summons No.3638 of 2013 has also expired. The Petitioner is at liberty to take out an appropriate application to bring the heirs of Respondent No.3 on record before the Trial Court. ... Respondent No.1, the only contesting Respondent, waives service. By consent of Respondent No.1, rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. ... Periods of limitations have to be precisely worked out and r....
It has been brought to my attention that Respondent No.3 to Chamber Summons No.3638 of 2013 has also expired. The Petitioner is at liberty to take out an appropriate application to bring the heirs of Respondent No.3 on record before the Trial Court. ... deceased on record. ... Respondent No.1, the only contesting Respondent, waives service. By consent of Respondent No.1, rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. ... 2. ... Periods of limit....
This was obviously not done; the appellants did not take any steps to bring the applicants/legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.8 on record. ... The applicants also seek permission to come on record as the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.8. 2. ... The applicants state that the counsel appearing for the applicants filed a Memo on 30.04.2019 informing the Court as well as the counsel for the appellants of the death of the re....
legal representatives come in. ... During the pendency of the appeal defendant 15 died and his legal representative came on the record as respondent 20. He supported the appellant and impugned the kanom granted by defendant 15 to defendant 2. ... During the pendency of the suit plaintiff 1 died and defendant 15 came on the record as his legal representative. ... That being so, he was not at liberty to depart from or contradict the position taken up by that person in the suit whose legal representative h....
In Ramkubai, the landlady filed a civil suit against respondent-tenant. When the original respondent died, his LRs were brought on record. The eviction was, among other grounds, bona fide requirement.
In the case in hand, the issue has been decided against the dead person and, therefore, the judgment passed by learned Single Bench is nonest. 7. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that a party to lis if expires, then the lis comes to an end on the death of party and that can be revived only when the deceased legal representatives are brought on record. So long as the legal representatives are not brought on record by taking recourse to Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure either at the instance of party to the lis or by legal representatives of decease....
According to the Apex Court what is a reasonable time would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. 10. Thirdly, in Puran Singh & Ors. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court had concluded that the provision of C.P.C. would not be applicable to a writ petition. Yet in case the petitioner or the respondent expires and the cause of action continues to exist against the legal representatives, then the opposite party is bound to bring the legal representatives on record “within a reasonable time”. However, as a guideline Article 120 of the Limitation Act can be used.
According to the Apex Court what is a reasonable time would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. However, as a guideline Article 120 of the Limitation Act can be used. 10. Thirdly, in Puran Singh & Ors. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court had concluded that the provision of C.P.C. would not be applicable to a writ petition. Yet in case the petitioner or the respondent expires and the cause of action continues to exist against the legal representatives, then the opposite party is bound to bring the legal representatives on record “within a reasonable time”.
The appellants are permitted to bring the LRs of deceased third respondent on record. As a consequence, the order dated 13.12.2006 is also set aside.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
